by Initiative to Support Women in Academic Philosophy
Dear All,
please save the date for the next Trans*Formations Event at the
Philosophy Institute.
For those who do not know the series: This talk and workshop series
organized by a bunch of people from the Philosophy Department (BA, MA
and PhD) provides insights into recent developments in trans*
philosophizing. Thanks to the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy (VDP)
[1] and queer@hochschulen [2] for their financial support!
In the next talk, Luana Pesarini (Goethe Universität Frankfurt) will
discuss historical and contemporary theories of the neural basis of
transness, and the presuppositions these studies rely on, from a
trans/feminist science studies perspective.
The next Event will be in English!
When & Where: Thursday, 30.5.2026 - 18:00-19:30 at HS 3A, NIG
(Universitätsstraße 7)
The Trans Brain?
History and Current Hypotheses on the Neural Basis of Transness
Abstract:
Against the background of contemporary debates about the supposed
natural basis of sex/gender and the intersection of neurodivergence and
transness, the lecture will turn to the history and contemporary
theories of the neural basis of transness. Contemporary trans brain
hypotheses rest on a whole array of presuppositions: The assumption that
brains have a sex/gender; that this brain sex/gender can stand in
opposition to the sex assigned at birth; that brain sex/gender develops
in response to hormonal changes; that this development has a temporal
threshold; and that one can discern transness from a
trans-sexed/gendered brain - all of these conveyed through imaging
technologies.
To fan out the presuppositions that fuel contemporary theories of the
neural basis of transness, the lecture will trace its history through
the lens of trans/feminist science studies. Starting from theories about
the natural bisexuality and plasticity of mammals and their eugenic
interpretations at the beginning of the 20th century (Eugen Steinach,
Paul Kammerer), the lecture will move through the early hypotheses about
the neural basis of transness in the post-Second World War inception of
trans medicine in the US (John Money, Robert Stoller, Harry Benjamin),
to the first neuroimaging studies on transness in the 1990s and early
2000s, to finish with the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of transness in
contemporary neuroscience and a discussion of its impacts on the lives
of trans people.
Neuronal explanations of transness certainly do not carry the same
weight in the debates about the natural basis of sex/gender and
transness as chromosomal explanations. Incidents such as the
International Chess Federation's ban of trans women from the women's
category, the European Society of Endocrinology's considerations about
brain scans as "a useful tool for earlier identification of
transgenderism in young people," and calls from neuroscientists to
intervene in and prevent the development of transness in the brain
nevertheless illustrate the current and potentially future power of such
explanations over the lives of trans people.
Bio: Luana Pesarini is a philosophy-trained sociologist specializing in
feminist science and technology studies, theories of materiality, and
trans feminism. She is currently working as a doctoral researcher in the
German Research Foundation-funded RTG "Fixing Futures. Technologies of
Anticipation in Contemporary Societies" at Goethe University Frankfurt,
Germany.
There will be a Q&A after the talk, as well as snacks and drinks!
Please also save the date for the next Trans*Formations Events: A talk
on Law and Gender by UK barrister Jane Russell on 15.5., and a full-day
event with a focus on Gender Euphoria on 7.6. with, among others, talks
by Quill Kukla (Georgetown University) and Eric A. Stanley (University
of California, Berkeley).
We are thankful to our previous Trans*Formations speakers: Luce deLire
[3], Alyosxa Tudor [4], Eric Llaveria Caselles [5], Emelia Stanley, [6]
Emma Heaney [7], Juliana Gleeson, [8] Gen Eickers & Sigmond Richli [9],
Jonah I. Garde [10] and Anna Klieber [11]!
We are looking forward to seeing you at the event, and happy if you
forward this invitation and the attached poster to others who might be
interested!
With all the best,
the Trans*Formations Team & UPSalon - A Salon for Underrepresented
Philosophers
Links:
------
[1] https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/
[2] https://queer-at-hochschulen.org/
[3]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/en/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/det…
[4]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
[5]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
[6]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
[7]
https://lists.philo.at/hyperkitty/list/news@lists.philo.at/thread/GIUSVC6TO…
[8]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
[9]
https://urise.univie.ac.at/mod/booking/optionview.php?cmid=293&optionid…
[10]
https://lists.philo.at/hyperkitty/list/news@lists.philo.at/thread/ZUJBVRNM7…
[11]
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
Dear all,
The VDP is hosting an additional writing evening session on 30 March.
Postdoctoral researchers, PhD students and late MA students are welcome
to join.
The evening will consist of four 50-minute writing sessions, with short
breaks in between for socialising over snacks.
Please bring your own laptops and/or other writing essentials.
When: 14:00–18:00
Where: Room 3A, NiG, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna
Information about other dates is at
https://urise.univie.ac.at/mod/booking/optionview.php?optionid=2578&cmid=29…
Best regards,
Raphael Aybar
Guten Tag,
Untenstehend möchten wir Sie über folgende Veranstaltungsänderung informieren:
S.g. Damen und Herren, liebe Kollegen/innen,
Wegen einer unvermeidlichen Terminkollision kann der Gastvortragsgeber, Prof. Dr. Schröder nicht nach Wen ausreisen.
Der Vortrag wird jedoch ONLINE gehalten. Der HS mit der Uhrzeit bleibt:
DO. 26.03.2026, 18:30 -20:15, HS 3D
Anbei das korrigierte Programm einschließlich der Semestervorschau.
MfG
KoPhil-Präsidium
www.kophil.at <http://www.kophil.at>
From: philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:philosophie@univie.ac.at> <philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:philosophie@univie.ac.at> >
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2026 4:32 PM
To: news(a)lists.philo.at <mailto:news@lists.philo.at>
Cc: 'George Karamanolis' <george.karamanolis(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:george.karamanolis@univie.ac.at> >; 'hisaki hashi' <hisaki.hashi(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:hisaki.hashi@univie.ac.at> >
Subject: [News] KoPhil-Vortrag am DO. 26.03. u. Semesterprogramm 2026S
Guten Tag!
Wir möchten Sie über die folgende Veranstaltung informieren:
--
S.g. Damen und Herren. Liebe Kollegen/innen,
Im Folgenden eine Ankündigung über den KoPhil-Vortragsabend in Zusammenarbeit mit Herrn Prof. Karamanolis.
Datum u. Ort: DO. 26.03.2026, 18:30, HS 3D
Institut für Philosophie der Universität Wien
1010 Wien, Universitätsstr. 7 (NIG), 3. Stock
Gastvortrag von: Lucian Hartmit Schröder (Prof. Dr., Europa-Universität) zum Thema
Die Unverfügbarkeit von Gesundheit:
Resonanz als Grundbegriff einer integralen Medizin
Näheres unter <http://www.kophil-at> www.kophil-at “Aktuelle Termine”
ANHANG: Programm des Vortragsabend am 26.03.2026
KoPhil Semesterprogramm 2026S
Interessierte werden herzlich eingeladen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
KoPhil-Präsidium
<http://www.kophil.at> www.kophil.at
Dear colleagues,
We cordially invite all of you to a talk by Prof. Giuseppe Longo,
Directeur de Recherches Emeritus, CNRS - Ecole Normale Supérieure,
Paris. Former “Professore Ordinario di Informatica”, Università di Pisa,
Italy.
Date: March 26, 2026 at 17:30
Venue: Seminarraum 3a (D0312) Department of Philosophy,
Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Vienna
Title: Models of Emergence in Physics vs Theories of Novelty Production
in Biology
Abstract: Several notion of ‘‘emergence’’ have been proposed in physics.
They mostly concern the emergence of new structures and forms
(morphogenesis). From Turing and Thom’s analysis of morphogenesis to
self-organization in far from equilibrium thermodynamics and Parisi’s
networks, a few types of emerging phenomena in complex systems will be
recalled. Then the difference will be stressed with “novelty production”
in biology. In Darwinian evolution, in particular, the conceptual (and
possibly mathematical) frames require the construction of new
perspectives, due to the nature of the intended observables and their
historical specificity. The issue of “unification” with the many
theories of inert matter involved in the understanding of biology will
be hinted, by setting bridges and proposing conceptual dualities.
This talk is organized by Prof. Dr. Tarja Knuuttila.
We look forward to your participation and to engaging discussions!
With kind regards
Florian Kolowrat
--
*Florian Kolowrat
*KgbU0UP0l8ByOdbG.png
Universität Wien | University of Vienna
Institut für Philosophie | Department of Philosophy
Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien | Vienna
Organisational Assistant to Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
Department of Philosophy – University of Vienna
Organisational Assistant to Univ.-Prof. Tarja Knuuttila, MSc M.Soc.Sc PhD
Department of Philosophy – University of Vienna
Mail: Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien
E-Mail:florian.kolowrat@univie.ac.at
Phone: +43-1-4277-46461
Web:https://ufind.univie.ac.at/en/ person.html?id=53614
<https://ufind.univie.ac.at/en/person.html?id=53614>
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
wir möchten Sie herzlich zur nächsten Veranstaltung der Reihe
„Phänomenologische Forschungen“ einladen:
*Vortrag und Workshop mit Narzissa Helfritzsch (Wien)*
*Mi., 25.3.2026, 18:30 Uhr, HS 3D, NIG*
VORTRAG: Narzissa Helfritzsch - "Grazie. Wenn sich das Leben als erwünscht
erlebt"
*Do., 26.3.2026, 9:00-13:00 Uhr, Sitzungssaal Dekanat
der Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien, Stiege
8, 2. Stock*
WORKSHOP zu den Texten von Sartre, Ahmed und Kopenawa
Texte zum Workshop finden Sie auf Moodle, schreiben Sie sich dafür gerne
hier <https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/newslettermoodle/> ein.
Weitere Informationen zu Veranstaltungen des *Forschungskreises
Phänomenologie* finden Sie auf unserer Website
<https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/> sowie auf Instagram
<https://www.instagram.com/forschungskreisphaenomenologie/>.
Mit besten Grüßen,
Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner, Georg Harfensteller
[image: Narzissa Einzelplakat.png]
Dear All,
The next talk in the "Wittgenstein=steine" series is this Friday (June
13th) at 3pm in room NIG 3D.
The speaker is Konstantin Deininger, and his title is:
_"On the Material and Formal Aspects of (Moral) Certainty"_.
Abstract:
Does morality have a binding character in the sense that chains of
justification come to an end? In this talk, I will affirm this question
and argue that we can plausibly distinguish between formal and material
aspects of moral certainty. As a starting point, I will interpret
Wittgenstein's idea of "bedrock," introduced in §217 of the
Philosophical Investigations, as standing for the end of a chain of
reasoning. In doing so, I align with certain Wittgensteinian
interpreters who maintain that some chains of moral reasoning end with
certainty. However, I will arrive at deviating conclusions by
demonstrating that different kinds of moral certainties function in
different ways. Wittgensteinian scholars such as Cora Diamond and Nigel
Pleasants correctly identify the formal aspect of moral certainty,
showing that some propositions resist justification and doubt. However,
the candidates for formal certainties they propose do not fully satisfy
the criteria of certainty. This, I argue, is due to their failure to
adequately distinguish between the formal and material aspects of
certainty. Material certainties, such as Diamond's "slavery is unjust
and insupportable" or Pleasants' "killing is wrong," remain intelligible
to some extent and are thus subject to justification and doubt. Still,
these propositions function as regress stoppers by putting an end to the
chain of reasoning--but they do not mark the boundary of the
unintelligible as formal certainties do. Drawing on Wittgenstein's later
writings, I will argue that only formal certainties--which I refer to as
transcendental certainties--are entirely exempt from justification and
doubt. I identify the principle "equals are to be treated equally" as a
plausible candidate for transcendental certainty. This certainty is
foundational to moral reasoning and enables moral thought. I illustrate
its role through debates on justice in animal ethics.
Everybody welcome!
Best wishes from the organizers,
Esther Heinrich-Ramharter
Anja Weiberg
Martin Kusch
Guten Tag!
Wir möchten Sie über die folgende Veranstaltung informieren:
--
S.g. Damen und Herren. Liebe Kollegen/innen,
Im Folgenden eine Ankündigung über den KoPhil-Vortragsabend in
Zusammenarbeit mit Herrn Prof. Karamanolis.
Datum u. Ort: DO. 26.03.2026, 18:30, HS 3D
Institut für Philosophie der Universität Wien
1010 Wien, Universitätsstr. 7 (NIG), 3. Stock
Gastvortrag von: Lucian Hartmit Schröder (Prof. Dr., Europa-Universität) zum
Thema
Die Unverfügbarkeit von Gesundheit:
Resonanz als Grundbegriff einer integralen Medizin
Näheres unter <http://www.kophil-at> www.kophil-at Aktuelle Termine
ANHANG: Programm des Vortragsabend am 26.03.2026
KoPhil Semesterprogramm 2026S
Interessierte werden herzlich eingeladen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
KoPhil-Präsidium
<http://www.kophil.at> www.kophil.at
Liebe alle,
wir laden herzlich zur nächsten Fakultätsöffentlichen Präsentation von Dissertationsprojekten (FöP) ein.
Die Veranstaltung findet am Mittwoch, den 18. März 2026, um 13:15 Uhr im Seminarraum 3A (NIG, 3. Stock) statt.
Im Anschluss an die Präsentationen besteht Gelegenheit zu einem gemeinsamen Austausch bei einem Buffet. Das Catering wird mit freundlicher Unterstützung der Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy (VDP) <https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/> ermöglicht.
Programm:
13:15 Uhr
Eva Hijlkema, BSc MA
The Concept of Benevolence in Neoliberal Capitalism
Betreuung:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Angela Kallhoff
13:45 Uhr
Joachim Raich, MA MSc
A Political Ethics of Ecological Grief
Betreuung:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Angela Kallhoff
14:15 Uhr
Caterina Mazziotti, MA
Freedom and Taxes in Favor of the Poor in Kant’s Doctrine of Right
Betreuung:
Assoz. Prof. Felix Pinkert, MLitt PhD
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Ihre Teilnahme!
Die FöP ist eine öffentliche Veranstaltung. Die Einladung kann gerne geteilt werden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Benjamin Schnieder
Studienprogrammleitung Doktoratsstudium Philosophie
***
Dear all,
We warmly invite you to the upcoming Public Faculty Presentation of Dissertation Projects (FöP).
The event will take place on Wednesday, 18 March 2026, at 1:15 p.m., in Seminar Room 3A (NIG, 3rd floor).
A buffet reception will follow the presentations. The catering is kindly supported by the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy (VDP) <https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/>.
Programme:
1.15 p.m.
Eva Hijlkema, BSc MA
The Concept of Benevolence in Neoliberal Capitalism
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Angela Kallhoff
1.45 p.m.
Joachim Raich, MA MSc
A Political Ethics of Ecological Grief
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Angela Kallhoff
2.15 p.m.
Caterina Mazziotti, MA
Freedom and Taxes in Favor of the Poor in Kant’s Doctrine of Right
Supervisor:
Assoz. Prof. Felix Pinkert, MLitt PhD
We are very much looking forward to your participation!
Please feel free to share this invitation with anyone who may be interested.
With best wishes,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Benjamin Schnieder
Director of the Doctoral Program in Philosophy

Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Iulian Danut Toader (IVC), who will give
a talk on March 19, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Iulian Danut Toader (IVC)*
Conservatism as a Norm of Scientific Practice
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
*
Date:* 19/03/2026
*
Time:* 16h45
*
Venue:* New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS 3C
*
Abstract:*
Contemporary scientists extol the virtues of conservatism, the view that
advocates the preservation of the theoretical status quo and
castigates everything beyond this as unfounded speculation. More
generally, conservatives emphasize that science has been almost always
cumulative, and scientific progress has been almost always made
through evolution, rather than revolution. They further suggest that
contemporary science should be cumulative, and that it should make
progress through evolution, rather than revolution.
In this talk, I provide a brief historical-conceptual analysis of
conservatism as a norm that urges us to preserve the theoretical
status quo, extend its intended domain of resiliency to the furthest
extent possible, and only allow changes if we have stronger reasons to
accept some theoretical alternative. I then focus on a specific
expression of conservatism - the so-called principle of permanence -
which has been extremely influential since mid-19th century in both
mathematics and physics, in an attempt to determine, more precisely,
the kinds of normativity that conservatism is thought to have.