This pluralistic joint seminar is organized by the University of Vienna,
Johannes Kepler University Linz, and Doshisha University (Kyoto, Japan).
It aims to foster meaningful intellectual exchange among scholars,
master's, and PhD students across national and disciplinary borders. By
bringing together students and scholars from the Philosophy and
Economics program in Vienna and the Faculty of Economics at Doshisha,
the seminar provides a platform for critical engagement with a plurality
of methodologies in the history of political economy. By exploring
differences in economic and philosophical ideas, the seminar encourages
dialogue that bridges different academic traditions and perspectives.
This joint seminar particularly investigates pluralism in the history of
economic thought, economic methodology, and philosophy of science.
Guests are welcome.
Date: Friday 05.09.2025
Time: 09:00 – 18:10
Place: University of Vienna, Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 2nd floor,
Seminarraum 13 (in person)
Organisers: Dahyun Lee, Alexander Linsbichler, Karl Milford
Keynote Speakers: Takato Kasai (Doshisha University, Kyoto), Julian
Reiss (Johannes Kepler University Linz)
Further Speakers: Lara Brühl, Vinzenz Fischer, Jakob Gschwandtner,
Dahyun Lee, Alexander Linsbichler, Taiki Nakao, Pauline Paulik, Shintaro
Wada
https://homepage.univie.ac.at/alexander.linsbichler/
Kind regards,
Dahyun Lee
MA Philosophy and Economics,
University of Vienna
Liebe Alle,
Frantz Fanon wäre im Juli 100 Jahre alt geworden. Dies haben wir (der
Forschungskreis Phänomenologie) zum Anlass für einen Lektüre-Workshop
genommen, am *Montag, 21.07., 16:45 im HS 3D* des NIG. Wir besprechen zwei
Aufsätze mit sprechenden Titeln aus der
Textsammlung "Für eine afrikanische Revolution": nämlich "Rassimus und
Kultur" (16 Seiten) und "Die Haltung der französischen Intellektuellen
und Demokraten zur algerischen Revolution" (19 Seiten).
HIER <https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/lw-fanon/> geht es zu
den Texten, oder gerne auch einfach eine kurze Mail an
georg.harfensteller(a)univie.ac.at
Wir freuen uns auf einen regen Austausch in der Sommerpause.
Alles Liebe,
Michael Zangerl und Georg Harfensteller
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Luana Poliseli (IVC Fellow), who will
give a talk on July 3, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Luana Poliseli (IVC Fellow)
THE LEFT VIENNA CIRCLE, DEMOCRATIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE EPISTEMIC
FUNCTIONS OF AESTHETICS
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 03/07/2025
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3A
Abstract:
Aesthetics is traditionally associated with the appreciation of beauty.
In science, beauty is traditionally and largely related to the success
of a theory or an experiment (McAllister 1996). However, recent debates
on the aesthetics of science have indicated that the scientists'
aesthetics arsenal is far more diverse and epistemically advantageous
than traditionally conceived (see Ivanova & French 2020; Ivanova &
Murphy 2023). I undertake these debates to argue against the traditional
oversimplification as it does not represent the complexity of aesthetic
values and experiences used in contemporary science to explain and
understand the world. By expanding the philosophical account of
aesthetics in science, this project challenges reductive views of
science as purely logical or objective. I second the Left Vienna Circle
on the ambiguities and lack of homogeneity in knowledge, and the
recognition of the limited resources of human cognitive capacities.
Acknowledging the plurality and vagueness of our cognitive endeavours
make us conscious of the limitations, gaps and ambiguities existent in
scientific practices. As such, I will emphasize that scientific
knowledge is not only shaped by empirical and theoretical considerations
but also by the sensuous, affective, and interpretive dimensions of
aesthetic experiences. Ultimately, by unboxing unorthodox methods
underlying scientific decisions, I reposition aesthetics as central to
reflections of scientific practice and knowledge production, enabling
philosophers to reconceptualize the epistemic functions of aesthetics as
a means of enriching scientific resources. If science, as a social and
cultural phenomenon, seeks to make sense of a world that is chaotic,
political, diffuse, emotional, ephemeral and transient, then it must
begin to embrace and engage with non-traditional methods and values that
reflect this diversity. By doing so, it can foster the creation of
spaces for development and dissemination that are more democratic and
inclusive.
by Dekanat der Fakultät für Philosophie und Bildungsw issenschaft
Philosophie des Geistes
<https://berufungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_berufungsserv…>
Philosophy of Mind
<https://berufungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_berufungsserv…>
The University of Vienna is internationally renowned for its excellence
in teaching and research, and counts more than 7,500 academics from all
disciplines. This breadth of expertise offers unique opportunities to
address the complex challenges of modern society, to develop
comprehensive new approaches, and educate the problem-solvers of
tomorrow from a multidisciplinary perspective.
At the Faculty of Philosophy and Education, the University of Vienna
seeks to appoint a
*Full Professor*
*of*
*Philosophy of Mind*
*The position:*
The successful candidate has a research focus in the philosophy of mind
and can demonstrate outstanding research achievements in this area
through internationally recognized publications.
*Your academic profile:*
·Doctoral degree/PhD
·Outstanding research achievements, excellent publication and funding
record, international reputation
·Proven leadership qualities
·Gender and diversity competence
·Experience in designing and managing large research projects
·Enthusiasm for excellent teaching and supervision at the bachelor's,
master's, and doctoral level
·Willingness to take on organisational and administrative
responsibilities within the Faculty and/or the University
The University of Vienna expects the successful candidate to acquire,
within three years, proficiency in German sufficient for teaching in
bachelor’s programmes and for participation in university committees.
*We offer:*
·a dynamic research environment
·a wide range of research and teaching support services
·attractive working conditions in a city with a high quality of life
·an attractive salary according to the Collective Bargaining Agreement
for University Staff
<http://personalwesen.univie.ac.at/en/services-for-employees/legal-framework/>(§98
UG, level A1, to be negotiated individually) and an organisational
retirement plan
·a “start-up package”, in particular for the initiation of research projects
·comprehensive relocation support
*Application documents:*
Please submit a *single PDF file* (LastName_FirstName.pdf) containing
the following information in English via e-mail to the Dean of the
Faculty, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Barbara Schulte, M.A.
(dekanin.philbild(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:dekanin.philbild@univie.ac.at>):
1. *Letter of motivation*
2. *Academic curriculum vitae*
oeducation and training
opositions held to date
ocareer breaks (e.g. parental, family or other care periods)
oawards and honors
ocommissions of trust
oprevious and current cooperation partners
olist of most important acquired third-party funding as principal
investigator, and, if applicable, of inventions/patents
olist of most important scientific talks (max. 10)
oteaching and mentoring
osupervision experience (Master and PhD)
3. *List of publications and a link to your **ORCID record *
4. *Research statement*
omost important research achievements (max. 2 pages) and planned future
research activities (max. 4 pages)
osynopsis of five key publications with relevance to the position
advertised
5. *Teaching and supervision statement*
oteaching and supervision concept, including a description of the
previous and planned priorities in academic teaching and supervision
(max. 2 pages)
*Appendices to application document*:
a.*Five key publications as electronic full text version*
b.*Teaching evaluations*(if available, compiled into a single PDF file)
c.*Copies of certificates of academic degrees*(mandatory, compiled into
a single PDF file)
The University of Vienna has an anti-discriminatory employment policy
and attaches great importance to equal opportunities, the advancement of
women <https://gleichbehandlung.univie.ac.at/> and diversity
<https://personalwesen.univie.ac.at/en/gender-equality-diversity/diversity/>.
We lay special emphasis on increasing the number of women in senior and
in academic positions among the academic and general university staff
and therefore expressly encourage qualified women to apply. Given equal
qualifications, preference will be given to female candidates.
University of Vienna. Spaceforpersonalities.Since1365.
_PrivacyPolicy
<https://backend.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_personalwesen/Jobs_Rec…>_
*Referenceno.: *Mind2025
*Applicationdeadline:*17 September 2025
Dear colleagues,
We cordially invite you to join the book talk and discussion on Mark’s
and David Gunkel’s new book
“Communicative AI – A critical introduction to Large Language Models”.
When: July 4th, 4:00 pm
Where: University Main Building, Erika Weinzierl Saal (1st floor)
With best wishes on behalf of the PhilTech Group,
Leonie
--
Dr. Leonie N. Bossert
Post-Doctoral University Assistant
Chair for Philosophy of Media and Technology
University of Vienna
Latest publications:
"Why the carbon footprint of generative large language models alone will
not help us assess their sustainability." Nature Machine Intelligence
2025 (7), 164-165, with Wulf Loh.
"On the values of microbes: An ethical investigation of relational
values associated with the microbial world." People and Nature 2025
(7/4), 804-814, with Davina Höll.
Reminder: Workshop „Klassismuskritik in der Philosophie(lehre)" am 2.
Juli 2025, 15-18 Uhr in 3A (NIG)
Im Mittelpunkt dieses Workshops stehen die Auseinandersetzung mit
Klassismus in der Philosophie(lehre), die Reflexion eigener
Lehrpraktiken unter machtkritischer Perspektive sowie die gemeinsame
Entwicklung klassismuskritischer Ansätze für Lehre und Lernräume
(Workshopbeschreibung angehängt).
Workshopleitung:
Dr. Lisa Scheer (Zentrum für Lehrkompetenz, Universität Graz)
Eine Vorbereitung ist nicht erforderlich. Anmeldung bitte über diesen
Link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe69hi_Gi3ulm8-mtn-L0Twgxc1TMd36GS…
Wir freuen uns auf einen anregenden Austausch!
Irene Salzmann & Leonie Möck
organisiert im Rahmen von UPsalon & mit Unterstützung der VDP
https://upsalon.univie.ac.at/events/
***********
Reminder: workshop "Classism in (Teaching) Philosophy" on July 2 2025,
3-6 PM, room 3A (NIG)
Key themes of the workshop include reflecting on class-based exclusion
and privilege in philosophy, developing strategies for class-critical
teaching, exploring the boundaries and possibilities of academic freedom
and institutional constraints (full description of workshop attached).
Workshop facilitator:
Dr. Lisa Scheer (Competence Center for University Teaching, University
of Graz )
No prior preparation is required. Please register using the following
link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe69hi_Gi3ulm8-mtn-L0Twgxc1TMd36GS…
We look forward to your participation and to engaging discussions!
Irene Salzmann & Leonie Möck
organized with UPsalon & supported by the VDP
https://upsalon.univie.ac.at/events/
Liebe alle,
wir laden herzlich zur nächsten Fakultätsöffentlichen Präsentation von Dissertationsprojekten (FöP) ein.
Am Mittwoch, den 25. Juni 2025 präsentieren drei Kandidat*innen ihre Dissertationsvorhaben im Hörsaal 2G (NIG, 2. Stock).
Im Anschluss an die Präsentationen laden wir zu einem Austausch bei Sekt und Sushi ein.
Programm:
13:15 Uhr
Miguel de la Riva
„Denkstil“: Zur Geschichte eines Begriffs zwischen Wissenschaft, Kunst und „Weltanschauung“
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Martin Kusch
13:45 Uhr
Emelia Stanley
Logic and Mathematical Conventionalism as Coördination Equilibrium
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
14:15 Uhr
Daniel Smyth
A Philosophical Study of Ordinary Fatigue
Supervisors:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hans Bernhard Schmid
Mag. Dr. Sandra Lehmann, Privatdoz.
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Ihre Teilnahme!
Die Einladung kann gerne mit interessierten Personen geteilt werden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Studienprogrammleitung Doktoratsstudium Philosophie (SPL 43)
***
Dear all,
We warmly invite you to the next Public Faculty Presentation of Dissertation Projects (FöP).
On Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 1:15 p.m. in Lecture Hall 2G (NIG, 2nd floor), three candidates will present their dissertation projects.
Following the presentations, we once again invite you to join us for a reception with sparkling wine and sushi.
Programme:
1:15 p.m.
Miguel de la Riva
„Denkstil“: Zur Geschichte eines Begriffs zwischen Wissenschaft, Kunst und „Weltanschauung“
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Martin Kusch
1:45 p.m.
Emelia Stanley
Logic and Mathematical Conventionalism as Coördination Equilibrium
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
2:15 p.m.
Daniel Smyth
A Philosophical Study of Ordinary Fatigue
Supervisors:
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hans Bernhard Schmid
Mag. Dr. Sandra Lehmann, Privatdoz.
We are very much looking forward to your participation!
Feel free to share this invitation with anyone who might be interested.
With best wishes,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Director of the Doctoral Program in Philosophy (SPL 43)
Dear all,
this is a reminder that the next PACE/KiC Metaphilosophical Talk is taking place on Wednesday June 25th!
Catarina Dutilh Novaes, VU Amsterdam
Title: Synthetic philosophy and the social epistemology of argumentation
Date: June 25th, Wednesday
Time: 16:45-18:15
Location: SE 2H, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG/2. Stock)
Abstract:
A methodological orientation that has gained some traction within philosophy in recent years is so-called ‘synthetic philosophy’ (Schliesser 2024). It is characterized by extensive engagement with research in relevant (empirical and conceptual) disciplines to inform philosophical inquiry, and by the attempt to formulate unifying explanations for findings coming from different fields. Thus understood, I have myself been deploying the synthetic method for many years (Dutilh Novaes, 2012) (Dutilh Novaes, 2020), even if not using the term itself (which I adopted circa 2018). Other self-declared synthetic philosophers include Philip Kitcher (Kitcher 2012) and Neil Levy (Levy 2021).
In this talk, I will present and defend the synthetic philosophy orientation, illustrating it in particular by means of my research project on the social epistemology of argumentation in recent years. The foundational idea of this research, i.e., the ‘glue’ that allowed for synthesis, is a conceptualization of argumentation as a form of _epistemic exchange_. On the basis of this conceptualization, I engaged extensively with research on exchange in the social sciences (in particular sociology and anthropology) to inform my inquiry into the socio-epistemic mechanisms at play in argumentative processes, and in particular the role of power relations therein. The presentation will include a brief preview of my forthcoming monograph _Reason and Power in Argumentation_, which summarizes the main findings of the project.
We look forward to seeing you!
Best wishes,
The PACE/KiC organising team
https://pace.phl.univie.ac.at/https://www.knowledgeincrisis.com/
Guten Tag! Wir möchten Sie über die folgende Veranstaltung informieren, die vor Ort am Institut für Philosophie stattfindet:
--
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Kollege/innen,
Im Folgenden eine Information über die nächste Veranstaltung des Vereins für Kompaeative Philosophie und interdisziplnäre Billdung/KoPhil.
DO. 26.06.2025, 18:30, HS 2 i, Insitut für Philosophie der Universität Wien
Thema: KoPhil Interdisziplinäres Forum
Eine freie Diskussionsrunde zum aktuellen Thema
„Was ist unser Wissen im Zeitgeist der Künstlichen Intelligenz?“
Diskussionsleitung: Univ.-Doz. Mag. Mag. Dr. Hisaki HASHI
(Institut für Philosophie der Universität Wien, KoPhil)
ZOOM Übertragung (Siehe Attachment)
Zu Beginn wird eine kurze Präsentation von der Vorsitzenden des Vereins KoPhil
über die Ideen und Prinzipien der L‘association française des convivialistes (Sitz in Frankreich) gehalten.
Es geht um die transversale Grundlage der Denkmethode des
Convivialismus und der Komparativen Philosophie.
https://kophil-interdis.at/wb/pages/kooperation.php
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
KoPhil-Präsidium
https://kophil-interdis.at
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Korbinian Friedl (IVC Fellow), who will
give a talk on June 26, 5.30-7 pm. Please note that this talk is later
than usually!
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Korbinian Friedl (IVC Fellow)
LEITGEB’S NEW VERIFIABILITY CRITERION, PROBABILITY, AND THICK CONCEPTS
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 26/06/2025
Time: 17h30
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3A
Abstract:
Hannes Leitgeb's recent paper "Vindicating the Verifiability Criterion"
presents a new attempt at drawing out the exact sense in which
(something like) verifiability is properly seen as the arbiter of
meaningfulness. He proposes a parametrized, probabilistic verifiability
criterion "scheme". As one of the advantages of his new criterion,
compared to the "original" verifiability criterion, he advertises its
greater flexibility, and the ability to account for, and make explicit
(in terms of different parametrizations), the different ways in which
certain statements can be meaningful for different communities.
The talk will present Leitgeb's ideas and raise to questions for them:1.
One issue with the original criterion is the strong dichotomy between
fact and value it entrenches, which e.g. Putnam argues makes it
impossible for it to account for the specific way in which Thick Ethical
Concepts are meaningful. Does the greater flexibility of Leitgeb's
criterion allow it to give a satisfying account of judgments involving
such terms?2. How does Leitgeb's probabilistic criterion interact with
different concepts of probability? Are there specific requirements on a
concept of probability which are necessary for the criterion to achieve
its semantic bite?