Dear all,
we warmly invite you to the next APSE (Applied Philosophy of Science and
Epistemology) Talk and Reading Circle. The talk will be held by Veli
Mitova (University of Johannesburg).
Talk:
When: Thursday, 22.05.2025, 15:00 - 17:00
Where: HS 3A, NIG (Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
Hermeneutical Reparations and the Right to be Known
According to an increasingly influential view in social epistemology, we
owe victims of gross human rights violations not only economic and
social reparations, but also reparations for the distinctively epistemic
wrongs that attend such violations (Lackey 2022). One type of epistemic
reparation is honouring victims' 'right to be known' (_ibid._)--their
right to have their true story known. This talk has two aims. First, I
argue that the right to be known cannot be successfully exercised in
hermeneutically unjust environments, i.e., environments in which the
explanatory and epistemic resources of the oppressed do not feature in
the mainstream knowledge economy (Dotson 2012, Fricker 2007). Thus, the
successful exercise of the right to be known requires what I call
hermeneutical reparations. The second aim of the talk is to sketch three
distinct kinds of hermeneutical reparations. If the arguments work, we
will have put into dialogue two bodies of scholarship that have,
curiously, not yet talked to each other. The dialogue will not only be
of mutual theoretical benefit to both, but will also up our chances of
attaining epistemic justice.
Speaker Bio
Veli Mitova is Professor in Philosophy and Director of the African
Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science [1] at the University
of Johannesburg. She works at the intersection of epistemology, ethics,
and social epistemology. She is the author of _Believable Evidence_
[2](CUP 2017), and the editor of _Epistemic Reparations and the Right to
Be Known_ [3] (forthcoming SI of _Philosophical Studies_), _Epistemic
Decolonisation_ [4](2020) and of _The Factive Turn in Epistemology_ [5]
(CUP 2018). Before joining the University of Johannesburg in 2015, Veli
taught and researched at Universität Wien, Universidad Nacional Autonoma
de México, Rhodes University (her alma mater), and Cambridge (where she
obtained her PhD).
Reading Circle:
When: Thursday, 22.05.2025, 13:00 - 15:00
Where: HS 3A, NIG (Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
We will focus our discussion on a forthcoming article by Veli Mitova
(attached pdf):
Mitova, V. (2025). Decolonial Epistemic-Authority Reparations.
_Episteme_. DOI: 10.1017/epi.2025.2
As introduction to Epistemic Reparations, Veli Mitova suggests the
following article:
Lackey J. (2022). 'Epistemic Reparations and the Right to Be Known.'
_Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association_
96, 54-89.
As introduction to Hermeneutical Injustice:
Fricker, M. (2007). Chapter 7: Hermeneutical Injustice. _Epistemic
injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing_. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Introducing the concept of Contributory Injustice:
Dotson, K. (2012). A cautionary tale: on limiting epistemic oppression.
_Frontiers - A Journal of Women's Studies_ (1): 24-47.
And the latest reading, distinguishing 3 kinds of Hermeneutical
Injustice:
Catala, A. (2025). Chapter 3: Deliberative Impasses, White Ignoring, and
Hermeneutical Domination. _The Dynamics of Epistemic Injustice:
Situating Epistemic Power and Agency. _New York: Oxford University
Press.
All the Best,
Ella Berger and Vinzenz Fischer
Links:
------
[1]
https://www.uj.ac.za/faculties/humanities/departments-2/philosophy/philosop…
[2] http://www.cambridge.org/9781107188600
[3] https://link.springer.com/collections/jhbeccifed
[4] https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rppa20/49/2?nav=tocList
[5]
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/factive-turn-in-epistemology/A12342A58…
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
untenstehend für Sie zur Information.
Mit besten Grüßen,
----
Institutskoordination
Dipl.-Ing. Katherina Geneviève Krobath, BEd
Andreas Wintersperger, MA
philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:philosophie@univie.ac.at>
+43(1)4277 46401
Institut für Philosophie
Universitätsstraße 7, Raum A316
1010 Wien
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/
Das Institut für Philosophie, die Polnische Akademie der Wissenschaften und die Wiener Gesellschaft für interkulturelle Philosophie laden zum Gastvortrag
Landscape Aesthetics and Environmental Virtue Ethics
Mateusz Salwa
Dienstag, 27. Mai 2025
9:45-11:15 Uhr
Institut für Philosophie
Hörsaal 3C
Universitätsstraße 7
1010 Wien
Abstract:
Although landscape is defined differently in contemporary humanities, and often in a way that avoids association with aesthetic values, in philosophy, landscape is almost invariably associated with aesthetics. In all its complexity and diversity, the experience of landscape appears as an aesthetic experience. At the same time, attention has recently been drawn to the fact that landscape also has an ethical dimension – landscape ethics has begun to complement landscape aesthetics. Landscape ethics is often equated with the question of the right to landscape, which entails the obligation to relate to landscape in the right way. If one wants to preserve the aesthetic sense of landscape, one way to combine aesthetics and ethics is the recently proposed concept of environmental virtue aesthetics, a modification of environmental virtue ethics. The aim of my talk is to discuss the relationship between landscape aesthetics and landscape ethics, and to point out the glories and shadows of the virtue-oriented approach.
Dr. habil. Mateusz Salwa is Assistant Professor at the Institute of Philosophy of the University of Warsaw.
Liebe alle,
wir laden herzlich zur nächsten Fakultätsöffentlichen Präsentation von Dissertationsprojekten der Philosophie (FöP) ein.
Am Mittwoch, den 4. Juni 2025 präsentieren drei Kandidat*innen ihre Dissertationsvorhaben im Hörsaal 2G (NIG, 2. Stock).
Im Anschluss an die Präsentationen laden wir zu einem Austausch bei Sekt und Sushi ein.
Programm:
13:15 Uhr
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich: Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Betreuung:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
13:45 Uhr
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Betreuung:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
14:15 Uhr
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination. Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Betreuung:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Ihre Teilnahme!
Die Einladung kann gerne mit interessierten Personen geteilt werden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Studienprogrammleitung Doktoratsstudium Philosophie (SPL 43)
***
Dear all,
We warmly invite you to the next Public Faculty Presentation of Dissertation Projects in Philosophy (FöP).
On Wednesday, June 4, 2025 at 1:15 p.m. in Lecture Hall 2G (NIG, 2nd floor), three candidates will present their dissertation projects.
Following the presentations, we once again invite you to join us for a reception with sparkling wine and sushi.
Programme:
1:15 p.m.
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich: Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Supervisor:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
1:45 p.m.
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
2:15 p.m.
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination. Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Supervisor:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
We are very much looking forward to your participation!
Feel free to share this invitation with anyone who might be interested.
With best wishes,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Director of the Doctoral Program in Philosophy (SPL 43)
Dear colleagues,
We are happy to invite you to a lecture that is part of the new event
series THINKING NATURE [1]that will take place at the Department of
Philosophy, University of Vienna, 2025-2026 (more information below),
organised by Eva-Maria Aigner and Ralf Gisinger.
The first lecture will take place on Friday, June 6, 6-8pm_,_ online and
in a hybrid setting, Room 3A (NIG):
Philippe Lynes (Durham University): "Anecological Dwelling: Derrida,
Heidegger, Blanchot"
Abstract: In the second year of his _The Thing _seminar (1976), Jacques
Derrida undertakes a comparative analysis of Martin Heidegger's
"Building, Dwelling, Thinking" with the literary work of Maurice
Blanchot. For Derrida, if Heidegger's bridge signals a gathering of two
shores, a gathering wherein mortals may learn to properly dwell in
saving the earth, the bridge for Blanchot would hint at an infinite
distancing of the two shores, a devastation that knows no salvation.
This interplay of the economical and the aneconomical, _the ecological
and the anecological_ would organize all of Derrida's readings of
Heidegger and Blanchot almost twenty years later in the _Secret et
témoignage _seminars. In unfolding these readings, we will ask what it
might mean, in reconsidering the relations and non-relations between
thinking and nature, to dwell _anecologically? _Might the anecological
open onto a new thinking that leaves nature to its secrecy _without us?_
Bio: Philippe Lynes' research situates itself at the intersections of
the environmental humanities, continental philosophy and ecocriticism.
He has held an Addison Wheeler Fellowship with the Institute of Advanced
Study and the Department of English Studies at Durham University. He was
a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Romance Languages and
Literatures at Harvard University, and held the Fulbright Canada
Visiting Research Chair in Environmental Humanities at the University of
California, Irvine. Lynes is the author of the two-volume _Dearth:
Deconstruction after Speculative Realism_, forthcoming with Northwestern
University Press in 2025 and 2026, and _Futures of Life Death on Earth:
Derrida's General Ecology_ (Rowman & Littlefield International, 2018).
He is co-editor (with Matthias Fritsch and David Wood) of
_Eco-Deconstruction: Derrida and Environmental Philosophy_, (Fordham
University Press, 2018) and (with Timothy Clark) of the _Oxford Literary
Review_ special issue "What Might Eco-Deconstruction Be?" (2023) Lynes
is also a translator and editor of French philosophy and literature,
notably of the work of Jacques Derrida and Maurice Blanchot. He is
associate editor of the journal _Derrida Today_, and one of the lead
editors of Blanchot's literary estate. He is currently working on two
books, _Ecologies of Emptiness_, on the Kyoto School, and an
introductory book on _The_ _Environmental Posthumanities_.
There will be two short responses to the lecture by Eva-Maria Aigner and
Noemi Call (both University of Vienna).
We will send out the zoom-link closer to the lecture.
Here you find more information about the event series:
THINKING NATURE [1]
University of Vienna, 2025-2026
Poststructuralism has long been accused of a general indifference to
questions of materiality and natural philosophy. From this perspective,
and in light of the urgent philosophical problem of the looming climate
crisis, poststructuralist theory does not seem ideally suited to
contribute to the question of nature. In recent years, however, numerous
authors have shown how poststructuralist theories can be made fruitful
in ecology, geo-philosophy or a philosophy of nature.
The lecture series, organised and curated by Eva-Maria Aigner and Ralf
Gisinger (Research Group "Poststructuralism, Gender Theory,
Psychoanalysis"), brings together some of the most intriguing
contemporary theorists in this field who will be invited to the
Department of Philosophy Vienna to give their philosophical perspectives
on "Thinking Nature" in the Anthropocene.
Events 2025
Philippe Lynes (Durham University)
_June 6_, 18:00-20:00, online. Live-Streaming and Responses in Room 3A
(NIG)
Didier Debaise (Université Libre Bruxelles)
_October 16_, Keynote, 18:30 (Lecture Room 3A (NIG), on-site/hybrid)
_October 17_, Workshop, 10:00-16:00 (Lecture Room 3A (NIG),
on-site/hybrid)
Claire Colebrook (Penn State University)
_November 21_, 10:00-12:00, online. Live-Streaming and Responses in Room
3A (NIG)
Organised by Ralf Gisinger and Eva-Maria Aigner
Funded by the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy
Research Group "Poststructuralism, Gender Theory, Psychoanalysis"
Registration and Information:
ralf.gisinger(a)univie.ac.at
eva-maria.aigner(a)univie.ac.at
poststrukturalismus.univie.ac.at [2]
Links:
------
[1]
https://poststrukturalismus.univie.ac.at/veranstaltungen/thinking-nature-ev…
[2]
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoststru…
Dear all,
The Philosophy of Science Group at the Department of Philosophy
cordially invites you to this mini workshop, taking place *today, 17:00
- 19:15 at NIG, Room 3D*.
You can also join via Zoom:
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/61325403480?pwd=csc5Ipp2tkz9MjwbvFioVELyphZW6u.1
*Mini workshop on AI and computing — 20.05.2025*
Lecture Room 3D (Room D0316, 3rd floor) Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna
Organized by: Univ.-Prof. Tarja Knuuttila
17:00 -18:00
Dr. Nick Wiggershaus (University of Lille)
*
*
*Computational Artifacts and the Problem of Creation*
As computer science integrates principles from logic, engineering, and
physics, the ontological status of its core entities, such as computer
programs, remains contested. Programs are often characterized as hybrids
that have a “dual nature.” In attempts to untangle such hybrids,
philosophers of computing have applied the concept of ‘technical
artifact’ (combining teleological function and physical structure) to
computing. While productive, it overlooks a notorious problem from the
philosophy of art: the /Problem of Creation/, which asks how abstract
objects like musical works or novels can be brought into existence
through concrete human activity. I argue that, like repeatable artworks,
computational artifacts have different representational modes (e.g.,
symbolic, mathematical, diagrammatic) and implementational media (e.g.,
ink on paper, chalk on a whiteboard, electrical signals, punched cards,
etc.). Just as a novel or a musical work is not identical to any one
performance or copy, a computer program persists across implementations.
This invites a philosophical conundrum: How can programmers /create
/abstract objects that are not located in space or time? By
appropriating solutions to the Problem of Creation, we gain alternative
ways to characterize the ontological status of programs and other
computing objects. I conclude by exploring whether we can understand
computational artifacts as /abstract /technical artifacts.
18:15-19:15
Dr. Laura Savolainen (University of Helsinki)
*Emperor’s New Crowds: “Untrustworthy” Workers and “Ground Truth”*
Ground-truth datasets are supposed to nail down facts about the “world”
represented by data, so that machine learning models trained on them
will behave reliably in that same world. Yet when annotation is
outsourced to platform workers whom engineers do not know, and often
mistrust, how is such reliability achieved or even imagined? Based on 27
interviews with machine learning researchers and practitioners, this
paper investigates how ground-truth datasets are stabilised when 1)
annotators are positioned as unreliable non-experts, 2) recognised
domain experts are prohibitively expensive, and 3) the platform
architecture itself suppresses deliberation, feedback, and learning.
Given these constraints, I illustrate ground-truthing as a canny,
iterative practice shaped by task design choices, aggregation methods,
disciplinary conventions, and the affective politics of trusting data
supplied by unknown workers. Rather than reflecting the world, the
resulting datasets operationalize narrowly bounded problem formulations
that satisfy performance goals ‘well enough’ for downstream modelling.
By analysing the epistemic hierarchies, organizational constraints and
judgment calls embedded in these pipelines, the discussion offers a
concrete case for re-evaluating realist assumptions about data,
evidence, and representation in contemporary AI research. Moreover, the
analysis opens normative space for re-imagining data pipelines around
more transparent authority structures and richer human feedback for more
reliable processes and outputs.
--
Alexander Gschwendtner
Universität Wien
Institut für Philosophie
Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien – Raum A0322
https://ufind.univie.ac.at/de/person.html?id=1009319
Dear all,
this is to remind you that Quassim Cassim is giving a talk entitled "How
To Be a Political Epistemologist" to which the WFAP warmly invites you.
When? This Wednesday, 1pm - 2.30pm
Where? HS 3A, NIG, Universitätsstraße 1, 1010 Vienna
Abstract:
One of the fastest growing areas of philosophy today is political
epistemology. In my lecture, I will discuss the extent to which its
leading figures operate in an epistemic bubble or echo chamber. I will
draw on Kusch's conception of a sociology of philosophical knowledge to
investigate the background assumptions, concerns, ideologies, and master
narratives of mainstream political epistemologists. I will propose a
class-based analysis of political epistemology and explore the
suggestion that this field's major preoccupations are essentially the
preoccupations of what Musa Al-Gharbi calls 'symbolic capitalists'. I
will conclude with a plea for a more diverse and self-critical approach
to political epistemology.
We are looking forward to seeing you there!
Best,
Veronika Lassl
Acting Chair - Vienna Forum for Analytic Philosophy (WFAP)
wfap.philo.at
Dear colleagues,
You are cordially invited to the interdisciplinary conference
"Free Will: New Perspectives from Philosophy, Biology and Neuroscience",
taking place on 11th & 12th June 2025 at the Austrian Academy of
Sciences (ÖAW), Vienna, Austria, and ONLINE.
Organiser: Dr. Anne Sophie Meincke (anne.sophie.meincke(a)univie.ac.at),
PI of the Elise Richter research project "Bio-Agency and Natural
Freedom" (Austrian Science Fund, grant DOI 10.55776/V714)
Description:
In everyday life, we naturally assume that it is up to us how we act,
and that we are therefore responsible for our actions. However, free
will in this strong, ‘libertarian’ sense – involving a choice between
alternatives – is increasingly being questioned by philosophers and
scientists. While traditional concerns were predicated on the
deterministic laws of classical physics, today sceptics also cite
biology and neuroscience. We are told that our genes or our brains, not
we, decide what we want and how we act.
This conference gathers leading experts in philosophy, biology and
neuroscience who argue the opposite. Cutting-edge research into the
biological and neural basis of human and animal agency challenges
deterministic assumptions, adding to doubts from quantum physics and
pointing to non-reductionist views of agency and action causation. At
the same time, recent advances in the philosophy of biology and
metaphysics offer new conceptual resources for understanding agency and
free will under indeterminism. The conference explores the resulting
prospects for a scientifically grounded, ontologically robust concept of
‘libertarian’ free will, breaking new ground in interdisciplinary
research on free will.
Invited Speakers:
Björn Brembs (University of Regensburg), John Dupré (University of
Exeter), Geert Keil (Humboldt University of Berlin), Christian List (LMU
Munich), Anne Sophie Meincke (University of Vienna), Alfred R. Mele
(Florida State University), Kevin Mitchell (with Henry Potter; both
Trinity College Dublin), Stephen Mumford (Durham University), Helen
Steward (University of Leeds), Peter U. Tse (Dartmouth College).
Concluding Reflections:
Johannes Jaeger (University of Vienna), Josef Quitterer (University of
Innsbruck)
For more details please see the attached conference programme and visit
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/detail/veranstaltung/der-freie-wille-im-fokus-von-ph…
To attend in person, please register free of charge via
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/veranstaltungen/anmeldung/free-will-new-perspectives…
Or follow the event via live stream:
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/veranstaltungen/live
The conference will be preceded by a Young Academy Distinguished Lecture
by Alfred R. Mele (Florida State University) and Anne Sophie Meincke
(University of Vienna & Young Academy of the Austrian Academy of
Sciences) on the question “Can Biology Help Us Defend Free Will?” on
10th June 2025 at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, see
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/junge-akademie/jours-fixes/1/news-details/young-acad…
We look forward to seeing you in Vienna or online.
Please also note the associated Call for Papers for a Topical Collection
in the journal "Synthese", entitled "Agency and Free Will in an
Indeterministic Universe: New Perspectives from Philosophy, Biology and
Neuroscience", see https://link.springer.com/collections/cjjciagiei .
Best wishes,
Dr. Anne Sophie Meincke
--
Recent publications:
"Continuant Processes or Processual Continuants? Towards an Analytic
Process Metaphysics", in: Objects and Properties: New Essays in
Metaphysics, ed. by A. Moran & C. Rossi, Oxford University Press,
forthcoming
"Emergent Properties", in: The Routledge Handbook of Properties, ed. by
A. Fisher & A.-S. Maurin (pp.347-357), Routledge 2024
"The Metaphysics of Development and Evolution: From Thing Ontology to
Process Ontology", Human Development 67, 5-6 (2023), 233-256:
https://doi.org/10.1159/000534421
"The Metaphysics of Living Consciousness: Metabolism, Agency and
Purposiveness", Biosemiotics 16 (2023), 281–290:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-023-09531-0www.annesophiemeincke.com
Elise Richter Research Fellow
Institute of Philosophy
University of Vienna
Universitätsstraße 7
1010 Vienna, Austria
Dear colleagues,
You are cordially invited to the Young Academy Distinguished Lecture
"Can Biology Help Us Defend Free Will? An Emerging Debate in
Philosophy", 10 June 2025, 17:00 (CEST).
Venue: Austrian Academy of Sciences, Johannessaal, Dr. Ignaz Seipel
Platz 2, 1010 Vienna, Austria, and online
Organiser: Dr. Anne Sophie Meincke (University of Vienna & Young Academy
of the Austrian Academy of Sciences)
Description:
Humans – members of the biological species homo sapiens – are products
of evolution. Therefore, if we have free will, it is plausible to assume
that our free will is also a product of evolution. But do we actually
have free will? Is it – at least sometimes – up to us what we decide to
do? Strikingly, philosophers have long ignored biology when it comes to
answering these questions. Instead, they have quibbled about whether and
how free will might fit into a supposedly deterministic universe as
studied by (classical) physics. Only recently has the debate about free
will begun to open up to biological considerations – so far, however,
mostly with sceptical results. We are told that it is not we but our
brains that decide what we want and how we act, or that our genes
determine our decisions, or other biological factors beyond our control.
In this Young Academy Distinguished Lecture, Alfred R. Mele, Professor
of Philosophy at Florida State University, and Anne Sophie Meincke,
member of the Young Academy and philosopher at the University of Vienna,
will take an overdue fresh look at the relationship between free will
and biology: Can biology help us understand and perhaps even defend free
will? If so, how? If not, why not? To make progress here, it is
necessary to critically analyse the arguments put forward against free
will in the name of biology. Do these sceptical arguments really show
what they claim to show? If not, then there is room to explore what
constructive role biology could play in an attempt to defend free will
against scepticism. Perhaps the common conception of a biological
organism as some kind of deterministic machine is not accurate after
all? How should we understand organisms instead? What biological
function could free will serve? Taking evolution seriously also suggests
considering the possibility that free will may not be a privilege of
human organisms.
First Lecture: Alfred R. Mele: "Free Will and Neurobiology"
Second Lecture: Anne Sophie Meincke: "Free Will Is Real and Biology
Helps Us Understand Why"
Join us for an inspiring and controversial discussion, which will be
moderated by Alice Auersperg, cognitive biologist at the Messerli
Research Institute, Vienna, and member of the Young Academy.
The Young Academy Distinguished Lecture Series brings cutting-edge
scientific topics to the public, presented by distinguished experts and
members of the Young Academy. The present two lectures kick off the
interdisciplinary conference "Free Will: New Perspectives from
Philosophy, Biology and Neuroscience", organised by Anne Sophie Meincke
and taking place at the Austrian Academy of Sciences on 11 and 12 June
2025, see
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/detail/veranstaltung/der-freie-wille-im-fokus-von-ph….
More information is to be found in the attached programme and at
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/detail/veranstaltung/willensfreiheit-und-biologie.
To attend in person, please register free of charge at
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/veranstaltungen/anmeldung/young-academy-distinguishe….
On-site childcare is available upon request. Please indicate your
interest when registering (by 2nd June).
Or follow the event via live stream at
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/veranstaltungen/live.
We are looking forward to seeing you.
Best wishes,
Dr Anne Sophie Meincke
--
Recent publications:
"Continuant Processes or Processual Continuants? Towards an Analytic
Process Metaphysics", in: Objects and Properties: New Essays in
Metaphysics, ed. by A. Moran & C. Rossi, Oxford University Press,
forthcoming
"Emergent Properties", in: The Routledge Handbook of Properties, ed. by
A. Fisher & A.-S. Maurin (pp.347-357), Routledge 2024
"The Metaphysics of Development and Evolution: From Thing Ontology to
Process Ontology", Human Development 67, 5-6 (2023), 233-256:
https://doi.org/10.1159/000534421
"The Metaphysics of Living Consciousness: Metabolism, Agency and
Purposiveness", Biosemiotics 16 (2023), 281–290:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-023-09531-0www.annesophiemeincke.com
Elise Richter Research Fellow
Institute of Philosophy
University of Vienna
Universitätsstraße 7
1010 Vienna, Austria
Dear all,
Diversifying syllabi is a growing demand in academic philosophy.
As a department, I am sure many have individual experiences and
expertise in including the voices of women, gender-non-conforming,
BiPOCs, and dis/abled philosophers in their teaching. This workshop aims
at "collectivizing" these experiences and to provide knowledge & tools
for those who aim at diversifying their syllabi for upcoming teaching.
When: 21.5.2025 9-11:30
Where: HS3A
The workshop will be run by Veli Mitova, Professor in Philosophy and
Director of the African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of
Science, University of Johannesburg. The workshop will build on sharing
experiences, ressources and "how to"s but also sets aside enough time
for participants to work on their syllabi:
09:00 - 09:45 Veli Mitova: Decolonising Philosophy: Lessons from South
Africa
09:45 - 11:00 Workshopping - Time to work on individual Syllabi (e.g.,
for WS25)
11:00 - 11:30 Closing Reflections, Feedback, Input
If you are interested in attending, please sign up via email:
sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
Everyone is welcome!
Best,
Sophie (Veigl)
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of
Johannesburg
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Guten Tag!
wir möchten Sie über folgende aktuelle Jobausschreibung am Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien informieren:
Universitätsassistent*in Praedoc,
im Forschungsbereich Antike Philosophie (3932)
Link zur Ausschreibung: https://jobs.univie.ac.at/job-invite/3932/
Wir laden alle Interessierten herzlich dazu ein, sich für diese Position zu
bewerben.
Bitte leiten Sie diese Information auch an potenziell interessierte Personen
in Ihrem Umfeld weiter.
Vielen Dank im Voraus für Ihre Unterstützung!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Katherina Krobath
--
Dear Sir or Madam,
We would like to inform you about the following current job opening at the
Department of Philosophy at the University of Vienna:
University Assistant Praedoc,
in the research area of Ancient Philosophy (3932)
Link to the job posting: <https://jobs.univie.ac.at/job-invite/3932/>
https://jobs.univie.ac.at/job-invite/3932/
We warmly invite all interested individuals to apply for this position.
We would also greatly appreciate it if you could share this information with
potentially interested individuals in your network.
Thank you in advance for your support!
Kind regards,
Katherina Krobath
----
Institutskoordination
Dipl.-Ing. Katherina Geneviève Krobath, BEd
Andreas Wintersperger, MA
<mailto:philosophie@univie.ac.at> philosophie(a)univie.ac.at
+43(1)4277 46401
Institut für Philosophie
Universitätsstraße 7, Raum A316
1010 Wien
<https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/> https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/