I have a question concerning temporal coherence in genuinely dynamic timespace: 

Conventional temporal coherence in first degree derivation is iteration not of a fixed moment but of a fixed sequence as series. The sequence, in turn, is a fixed form of participating fragments’ relating to each other. This relating has the form of iterated emergence from a present ground to unfold into a next present ground. 

A second-degree temporal coherence may be described as consisting of a second-degree derivation steadiness in that the adaptive temporal change of sequences still follows a consistent, second-degree static consequence. 

If we assume timespace as a third-degree derivation consisting of, and as being made of coherent interactional „units “coherent in first- and second-degree derivation, we may see this timespace as a third-degree derivation’s constancy of underlaying first- and second-degree derivations. 

It is formed by and acts as a third-degree derivation’s constant baseline pulsation, pulsating with a frequency consistently underlaying the sequences stable in their first- and second-degree derivations.

The “geometry” of this inherently congruent timespace pulsation would accord to an “extension” and “contraction” – yet with the “sphere” not measured in purely spatial but also temporal terms, whatever this temporospatial “geometry” may be. 

Is this rough speculation in line with any of the current timespace models? (I know the Minkowski timespace but think this is somehow different.