You are cordially invited to the upcoming workshop at the Institute Vienna Circle:
Life and Work: On Writing About Philosopher’s Lives
13-14 June 2025
Room 3A
Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien
How do we write about the lives of philosophers, and what brings us to write and read philosophical biographies?
Throughout its history, the discipline of philosophy was shaped by human interaction and personal experience as much as by hard thinking of individuals interacting with the world solely through written word. Trends in intellectual migration (or lack thereof) led to differences between philosophical traditions of different countries. There are multiple examples of friendships and personal networks enabling philosophers to flourish intellectually and in their careers; personal conflicts and character clashes could also nearly break said careers. In the relatively recent past, we have seen women enter academic philosophy, sometimes bringing with them perspectives and insights born directly from their personal experience. Their lives as women and their academic careers were inextricably linked.
This kind of research and writing becomes particularly relevant when philosophy becomes interested in its history not only from a purely conceptual perspective, but as a history of its people and institutions, which existed in a particular time and place. The practice of biographical writing can both result from such interest, and help satisfy it.
The workshop is organised by the MSCA Project "What was and what could have been: Janina Hosiasson-Lindenbaum’s role in the philosophy of probability", led by Marta Sznajder
Programme
Friday, 13 June
9:45 Welcome and introduction
10:00 -11:00 Christian Damböck, Rudolf Carnap in Chicago. The transformation of antimetaphysics
11:30 – 12:30 Patricia Grill, “Revered Miss”: Otto Neurath’s Early Letters and Reflections on Ellen Key
14:30 – 15:30 Matteo Collodel, False Memories and True Lies: Personal, institutional and philosophical issues in intellectual biography writing – The case of Paul K. Feyerabend
16:00 – 17:00 Zofia Hałęza, Philosophy beyond the text: women as architects of intellectual space
Saturday, 14 June
10:00 – 11:00 Sophia Connell, Early analytic women philosophers in Cambridge
11:30 – 12:30 Alan Richardson, When is biography philosophical? Lessons from the life of Hans Reichenbach
14:30 – 15:30 Cheryl Misak, Incorporating Technical Material in an Intellectual Biography
16:00 – 18:00 Marta Sznajder, From a bag of facts to a narrative – Workshopping the biography of Janina Hosiason-Lindenbaum
----
Marta Sznajder
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow
Institute Vienna Circle
University of Vienna
www.martasznajder.com <http://www.martasznajder.com>
marta.sznajder(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:marta.sznajder@univie.ac.at>
The Institute Vienna Circle and the Vienna Circle Society cordially invite
you to the
8th Arthur Pap Lecture
Luca Oliva (University of Houston)
Kinds of A Priori
Thursday, June 12, 2025
5 pm
Aula am Campus
University of Vienna
Hof 1, Eingang 1.11
Spitalgasse 2-4
1090 Vienna
For those who can't make it to Vienna, the event will also be streamed via
YouTube: <https://www.youtube.com/live/DMGipA4G1ks> Link
Registration for the event in Vienna: <mailto:vcs@univie.ac.at>
vcs(a)univie.ac.at
No registration fee
Abstract
In 1944, Arthur Pap analyzed different kinds of "a priori" beyond the
scientific statements that served as the standard reference for the logical
empiricist criticism of the Kantian model. His analysis focuses on the
meanings of formal, material, and functional a priori, engaging primarily
with the arguments of Aristotle, Kant, Schlick, Wittgenstein, Dewey, and
Carnap. In this context, Pap advocates for the reducibility of Kant's
synthetic a priori to the material a priori, while also arguing for the
consistency of the latter with the functional meaning of the a priori.
Oliva's talk will center on the first two meanings. It will specifically
analyze Pap's views on Kant's synthetic-analytic distinction, Leibniz's
notion of true sentences as identities (which relates to Wittgenstein's
notion of tautology), and Hilbert's notion of implicit definitions - adopted
by Schlick and defended by Einstein. Oliva will also consider Pap's later
writings from 1949 and 1957 and assess the claims concerning analyticity,
necessity, and material implication they developed. Supporting references
will include works by Shieh (2006), Stump (2011, 2021), Mormann (2021), and
Limbeck-Lilienau (2025).
Short Bio
Luca Oliva is an assistant professor and the program director of Liberal
Studies at the University of Houston. His research interests lie in
epistemology and philosophy of mathematics but also involve ethics and
metaethics. He has primarily published on issues of analytic Kantianism, the
a priori in logical empiricism (including Wittgenstein), and Rickert's
abstract objects and normativity. His articles have appeared in the Kantian
Review, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and collections published
by Cambridge University Press, the North American Kant Society, and De
Gruyter. Oliva teaches theories of knowledge and truth, as well as ethics.
In recent years, he has been a lecturer at the University of Vienna (2019)
and the Institute Vienna Circle (2015, 2017), an academic visitor at the
University of Oxford (2016, 2017), and a visiting professor at the
Universities of Insubria (2024) and Bergamo (2015, 2022) in Italy.Since
2024, Oliva has co-organized the Reconstructing Carnap webinar series
affiliated with the University of Florence. In 2023, he also initiated the
Ethics and Normativity Seminar Series at the University of Houston.
*Erreichbarer Frieden – Eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung*
Friedenskonzeptionen unterscheiden sich in der Art und Weise, wie sie
Frieden begreifen: Philosophische Ansätze diskutieren einerseits ideale
Vorstellungen von Frieden, andererseits konkrete Handlungsnormen, wie
etwa in der Tradition des gerechten Krieges. In der Soziologie wird
erreichbarer Frieden als ein messbarer Zustand der Konfliktbewältigung
verstanden. Politisch könnten wir ihn als Ausgestaltung von
Machtverhältnissen oder die verhandlungsgeleitete, praktische
Umsetzbarkeit eines Nicht-Kriegszustands verstehen. Der Workshop zielt
darauf ab, diese Perspektiven miteinander ins Gespräch zu bringen.
Im Zeitalter der Wiederaufrüstung Europas stellen sich moralische,
politische und institutionelle Fragen nach der Erreichbarkeit von
Frieden: Was macht einen erreichbaren Frieden aus? Wie können wir ihn
disziplinübergreifend begreifen? Macht ein erreichbarer Frieden den
Diskurs über idealisierte Friedensvorstellungen obsolet? Wie lässt sich
ein solcher Friedensbegriff in unser Denken darüber integrieren, was im
Hier und Jetzt getan werden sollte?
*Datum:* Freitag, 13. Juni 2025
*Zeit:* 9:00 – 17:00 Uhr (inkl. Mittagspause von 12:30 – 13:30 Uhr)
*Ort:* Institut für Philosophie, Seminarraum 3A, Universitätsstraße 7,
3. Stock, 1010 Wien
*Vortragende*:
* Max Haller (Universität Graz)
* Georg Kunovjanek (Theresianische Militärakademie)
* Stephanie Fenkart (International Institute for Peace, IIP)
* Angela Kallhoff (Universität Wien)
* Lisa Tragbar (Universität Wien)
* Andreas Oberprantacher (Universität Innsbruck)
Der Workshop ist kostenlos, aber die Plätze vor Ort sind begrenzt. Ich
bitte daher um eine formlose Anmeldung an lisa.tragbar(a)univie.ac.at.
Eine Online-Teilnahme über Zoom ist möglich. Nach Anmeldung schicken wir
Ihnen gern einen Link zu.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Lisa Tragbar
Dear all,
we warmly invite you to the next APSE (Applied Philosophy of Science and
Epistemology) Talk and Reading Circle. The talk will be held by Maria
Baghramian (University College Dublin).
Talk:
When: Thursday, 12.06.2025, 15:00 - 17:00
Where: HS 3A, NIG (Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
Title: Disagreement and Trust - the case from democracy and sconce
Abstract
Trust in democratic institutions has been in steep decline across many
western countries. Trust in science and scientists, at least in some
specific areas of science, has also come under question. It is widely
accepted that a certain level of public trust is essential to any
well-functioning democracy. Trust in science, in so far as scientific
findings have a role in the public life, is also crucial. A great deal
has been written about the so called "crisis of trust" in earth of these
domains. Less has been said about the connections and the structural
similarities or dissimilarities between the two.
This paper is an attempt to investigate the parallels between trust in
science and in democratic politics by focusing on the deep and at times
widespread disagreements present in both. I will argue that while
disagreement in both politics and science is necessary for their proper
functioning, certain types of disagreement can also lead to disfunction
and break down of trust. I follow a familiar distinction between
alethic, normative and identity based sources of disagreement using
recent work by Michael Lynch (2025) and Pippa Norris (2019) as my
examples of these differing approaches and argue that the corrosive type
of disagreement that leads to breakdown of trust should be understood in
terms of the commitments people have and develop in their lifetime
rather than their beliefs in truths or values. Commitments have
affective and conative features that are not always present in mere acts
of believing (See for instance Bernard Williams 1981 and Timothy
Scanlon, 1998). The connections between trust and commitments are also
stronger and deeper than those with beliefs (see for instance John
Holton, 1994). I conclude by auguring that a focus on disagreement
between commitments, both normative and alethic, could be a more
fruitful way of looking at the relationships between disagreement and
trust in politics and in science.
Bio
Professor Maria Baghramian is Full Professor of American Philosophy at
UCD School of Philosophy and a co-director of the UCD Post Graduate
Programme in Cognitive Science, which she co-founded in 2000. She has
held visiting posts in Harvard, MIT, University of Yerevan, Institut
Jean Nicod, Paris and in various universities in China. She was a
Fulbright Senior Scholar in Harvard in 2013. Baghramian was elected to
the Royal Irish Academy in 2010 and to its Council for two consecutive
terms. In June 2022 she was elected to the Academia Europaea (The
Academy of Europe). In 2022, she was Highly Commended in the Irish
Research Council Researcher of the Year Awards.
She is, with the astrophysicist Luke Drury, the Principal Investigator
of a research project on peer expert disagreement "When Experts
Disagree" (WEXD), funded by the Irish Research Council. Currently, she
is the coordinator and project leader of PERITIA - Policy, Expertise and
Trust in Action - a Horizon 2020 multi-disciplinary research project
funding of 3 million euro from the European Commission. In the European
arena, Baghramian been an active member of three working groups on
topics of truth, trust and science with the All European Academies
(ALLEA) and its science and policy mechanism SAPEA. Internationally, she
is a member of the steering committee of the International Federation of
Philosophical Societies, a member of the Programme Committee of the 2024
World Congress, and a member of the International Cooperation Committee
of the American Philosophical Association. She also has had numerous
academic engagements in China and Armenia.
Baghramian has also organised over 40 international conferences,
workshops and public lectures and is the founder and two term President
of the Society for Women in Philosophy in Ireland and representative of
Scholars at Risk programme. Baghramian has published extensively,
including 14 edited and authored books, on topics from epistemology and
contemporary American philosophy. She was also the editor of the
International Journal of Philosophical Studies (2004-14) and the
co-editor of Contemporary Pragmatism (2016-2021).
Reading Circle:
When: Thursday, 12.06.2025, 13:15 - 15:00
Where: HS 3A, NIG (Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
We will focus our discussion on a forthcoming review article by Maria
Baghramian and Silvia Caprioglio Panizza (attached doc):
Baghramian, Maria and Silvia Caprioglio Panizza (forthcoming) "Expertise
and the Ethics of Trust: A Review" In: _ETICA Yearbook_.
Since the article is a review and a very good introduction to the topic,
I only suggest these two short papers as additional introduction:
Croce, M., & Baghramian, M. (2024). Experts - part I: What they are and
how to identify them. _Philosophy Compass_, e13009.
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.13009 [1]
Croce, M., & Baghramian, M. (2024). Experts--Part II: The sources of
epistemic authority. _Philosophy Compass_, e70005.
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70005 [2]
For further reading regarding the topic:
Lynch, M. (2025). _On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It_.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
https://doi-org.uaccess.univie.ac.at/10.1515/9780691231945
Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. _The Journal of
Philosophy_, _88_(12), 693-708.
Warren, M. E. (Ed.). (1999). _Democracy and Trust._Cambridge University
Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511659959
All the best,
Ella Berger and Vinzenz Fischer, on behalf of the APSE team
Links:
------
[1] https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.13009
[2] https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70005
Dear colleagues,
We are happy to invite you to a lecture that is part of the new event
series THINKING NATURE [1]that will take place at the Department of
Philosophy, University of Vienna, 2025-2026 (more information below),
organised by Eva-Maria Aigner and Ralf Gisinger.
The first lecture will take place on Friday, June 6, 6-8pm_,_ online and
in a hybrid setting, Room 3A (NIG):
Philippe Lynes (Durham University): "Anecological Dwelling: Derrida,
Heidegger, Blanchot"
Abstract: In the second year of his _The Thing _seminar (1976), Jacques
Derrida undertakes a comparative analysis of Martin Heidegger's
"Building, Dwelling, Thinking" with the literary work of Maurice
Blanchot. For Derrida, if Heidegger's bridge signals a gathering of two
shores, a gathering wherein mortals may learn to properly dwell in
saving the earth, the bridge for Blanchot would hint at an infinite
distancing of the two shores, a devastation that knows no salvation.
This interplay of the economical and the aneconomical, _the ecological
and the anecological_ would organize all of Derrida's readings of
Heidegger and Blanchot almost twenty years later in the _Secret et
témoignage _seminars. In unfolding these readings, we will ask what it
might mean, in reconsidering the relations and non-relations between
thinking and nature, to dwell _anecologically? _Might the anecological
open onto a new thinking that leaves nature to its secrecy _without us?_
Bio: Philippe Lynes' research situates itself at the intersections of
the environmental humanities, continental philosophy and ecocriticism.
He has held an Addison Wheeler Fellowship with the Institute of Advanced
Study and the Department of English Studies at Durham University. He was
a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Romance Languages and
Literatures at Harvard University, and held the Fulbright Canada
Visiting Research Chair in Environmental Humanities at the University of
California, Irvine. Lynes is the author of the two-volume _Dearth:
Deconstruction after Speculative Realism_, forthcoming with Northwestern
University Press in 2025 and 2026, and _Futures of Life Death on Earth:
Derrida's General Ecology_ (Rowman & Littlefield International, 2018).
He is co-editor (with Matthias Fritsch and David Wood) of
_Eco-Deconstruction: Derrida and Environmental Philosophy_, (Fordham
University Press, 2018) and (with Timothy Clark) of the _Oxford Literary
Review_ special issue "What Might Eco-Deconstruction Be?" (2023) Lynes
is also a translator and editor of French philosophy and literature,
notably of the work of Jacques Derrida and Maurice Blanchot. He is
associate editor of the journal _Derrida Today_, and one of the lead
editors of Blanchot's literary estate. He is currently working on two
books, _Ecologies of Emptiness_, on the Kyoto School, and an
introductory book on _The_ _Environmental Posthumanities_.
There will be two short responses to the lecture by Eva-Maria Aigner and
Noemi Call (both University of Vienna).
We will send out the zoom-link closer to the lecture.
Here you find more information about the event series:
THINKING NATURE [1]
University of Vienna, 2025-2026
Poststructuralism has long been accused of a general indifference to
questions of materiality and natural philosophy. From this perspective,
and in light of the urgent philosophical problem of the looming climate
crisis, poststructuralist theory does not seem ideally suited to
contribute to the question of nature. In recent years, however, numerous
authors have shown how poststructuralist theories can be made fruitful
in ecology, geo-philosophy or a philosophy of nature.
The lecture series, organised and curated by Eva-Maria Aigner and Ralf
Gisinger (Research Group "Poststructuralism, Gender Theory,
Psychoanalysis"), brings together some of the most intriguing
contemporary theorists in this field who will be invited to the
Department of Philosophy Vienna to give their philosophical perspectives
on "Thinking Nature" in the Anthropocene.
Events 2025
Philippe Lynes (Durham University)
_June 6_, 18:00-20:00, online. Live-Streaming and Responses in Room 3A
(NIG)
Didier Debaise (Université Libre Bruxelles)
_October 16_, Keynote, 18:30 (Lecture Room 3A (NIG), on-site/hybrid)
_October 17_, Workshop, 10:00-16:00 (Lecture Room 3A (NIG),
on-site/hybrid)
Claire Colebrook (Penn State University)
_November 21_, 10:00-12:00, online. Live-Streaming and Responses in Room
3A (NIG)
Organised by Ralf Gisinger and Eva-Maria Aigner
Funded by the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy
Research Group "Poststructuralism, Gender Theory, Psychoanalysis"
Registration and Information:
ralf.gisinger(a)univie.ac.at
eva-maria.aigner(a)univie.ac.at
poststrukturalismus.univie.ac.at [2]
Links:
------
[1]
https://poststrukturalismus.univie.ac.at/veranstaltungen/thinking-nature-ev…
[2]
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoststru…
The Institute Vienna Circle and the Vienna Circle Society cordially
invite you to the
*8th Arthur Pap Lecture*
*Luca Oliva (University of Houston)*
Kinds of A Priori
*Thursday, June 12, 2025**
*5 pm**
Aula am Campus
University of Vienna
Hof 1, Eingang 1.11
Spitalgasse 2-4
1090 Vienna
*For those who can't make it to Vienna, the event will also be streamed
via YouTube:Link <https://www.youtube.com/live/DMGipA4G1ks>*
Registration:vcs@univie.ac.at <mailto:vcs@univie.ac.at>
No registration fee
Abstract
In 1944, Arthur Pap analyzed different kinds of "a priori" beyond the
scientific statements that served as the standard reference for the
logical empiricist criticism of the Kantian model. His analysis focuses
on the meanings of formal, material, and functional a priori, engaging
primarily with the arguments of Aristotle, Kant, Schlick, Wittgenstein,
Dewey, and Carnap. In this context, Pap advocates for the reducibility
of Kant's synthetic a priori to the material a priori, while also
arguing for the consistency of the latter with the functional meaning of
the a priori. Oliva's talk will center on the first two meanings. It
will specifically analyze Pap's views on Kant's synthetic-analytic
distinction, Leibniz's notion of true sentences as identities (which
relates to Wittgenstein's notion of tautology), and Hilbert's notion of
implicit definitions – adopted by Schlick and defended by Einstein.
Oliva will also consider Pap's later writings from 1949 and 1957 and
assess the claims concerning analyticity, necessity, and material
implication they developed. Supporting references will include works by
Shieh (2006), Stump (2011, 2021), Mormann (2021), and Limbeck-Lilienau
(2025).
Short Bio
Luca Olivais an assistant professor and the program director of /Liberal
Studies/ at the University of Houston. His research interests lie in
epistemology and philosophy of mathematics but also involve ethics and
metaethics. He has primarily published on issues of analytic Kantianism,
the a priori in logical empiricism (including Wittgenstein), and
Rickert's abstract objects and normativity. His articles have appeared
in the /Kantian Review/, the /Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/, and
collections published by Cambridge University Press, the North American
Kant Society, and De Gruyter. Oliva teaches theories of knowledge and
truth, as well as ethics. In recent years, he has been a lecturer at
the University of Vienna (2019) and the Institute Vienna Circle (2015,
2017), an academic visitor at the University of Oxford (2016, 2017), and
a visiting professor at the Universities of Insubria (2024) and Bergamo
(2015, 2022) in Italy.Since 2024, Oliva has co-organized the
/Reconstructing Carnap/ webinar series affiliated with the University of
Florence. In 2023, he also initiated the /Ethics and Normativity Seminar
Series/ at the University of Houston.
Postdoc Day - 12 June 2025 - 10:00-13:00
Dear postdocs of the Department of Philosophy,
The Vienna Doctoral School, together with the Postdoc Career Development
Unit at the University of Vienna, is organising a Postdoc Day for the
first time. There will also be an opportunity to socialise over snacks
and drinks. Here is a brief description of the event:
Postdoc Career Day
12 June 2025, 10:00–13:00
3A NiG, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna
Kick off with a hands-on workshop led by career coach Martin Buxbaum
(LBG Career Centre), exploring diverse opportunities outside academia.
You will also have the opportunity to learn about the various career
development resources available with Madeleine Harbich from the
University of Vienna's Postdoc Career Development project. You can then
stay for informal networking over snacks and drinks with pre- and
post-docs, as well as a support session—a chance to ask questions, make
connections, and plan your next move.
10:00-11:45 - Workshop: Careers Beyond Academia (Trainer: Martin
Buxbaum)
11:45-12:00 - Career Development Opportunities for Postdocs (Speaker:
Madeleine Harbich)
12:00-13:00 - Praedoc-Postdoc Networking and Individual Support Session
In order to support us with the planning of the event, we kindly ask you
to register via u:rise. You can log in using your Uni Wien user ID.
https://urise.univie.ac.at/mod/booking/optionview.php?optionid=985&cmid=292…
Best,
Raphael
--
MSc. Mag. Raphael Aybar, BA
Scientific Coordinator
Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy
University of Vienna
Universitätsstraße 7, B0301
1010 Wien
+43-1-4277-46020
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/
vd.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at
raphael.aybar(a)univie.ac.at
Liebe alle,
wir laden herzlich zur nächsten Fakultätsöffentlichen Präsentation (FöP) ein.
Am Mittwoch, den 4. Juni 2025 präsentieren drei Kandidat*innen ihre Dissertationsvorhaben im Hörsaal 2G (NIG, 2. Stock). Im Anschluss an die Präsentationen laden wir zu einem Austausch bei Sekt und Sushi ein.
Programm:
13:15 Uhr
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich:
Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Betreuung:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
13:45 Uhr
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Betreuung:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
14:15 Uhr
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination.
Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Betreuung:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Ihre Teilnahme!
Die Einladung kann gerne mit interessierten Personen geteilt werden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Studienprogrammleitung Doktoratsstudium Philosophie (SPL 43)
***
Dear all,
We warmly invite you to the next Public Faculty Presentation (FöP).
On Wednesday, June 4, 2025 at 1:15 p.m. in Lecture Hall 2G (NIG, 2nd floor), three candidates will present their dissertation projects. Following the presentations, we once again invite you to join us for a reception with sparkling wine and sushi.
Programme:
1:15 p.m.
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich: Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Supervisor:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
1:45 p.m.
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
2:15 p.m.
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination. Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Supervisor:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
We are very much looking forward to your participation!
Feel free to share this invitation with anyone who might be interested.
With best wishes,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Director of the Doctoral Program in Philosophy (SPL 43)
Dear all,
You are hereby invited to the next "Physics meets Philosophy" talk
(organized in cooperation with the Institute for Quantum Optics and
Quantum Information) by
Boris Kožnjak (Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb)
Title: Metaphysical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Aristotelian
Perspective (see abstract below)
Date: June 5th (Thursday)
Time: 13:30-15:00
Location: IQOQI Seminar room (Boltzmanngasse 3, 2nd floor)
Zoom link (for those that cannot join in person):
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/62865750030?pwd=Fe2gRi4waS8oramaalaIP2zvDPdLfb.1
Abstract:
Since the earliest days of quantum mechanics in the 1920s, efforts have
been made to establish its metaphysical foundations. One of the earliest
of these was proposed by Werner Heisenberg, one of the theory’s founding
figures, who suggested that such foundations might be found in
Aristotle’s metaphysics, particularly in the concepts of potentiality
(dunamis) and actuality (energeia). Although this perspective has since
evolved into various dispositional interpretations of quantum mechanics,
little attention has been paid to what these metaphysical foundations
would indeed look like when grounded in Aristotle’s original philosophy,
a project Heisenberg outlined only in broad strokes. Drawing on the
author’s previous work, this lecture will explore the historical and
philosophical dimensions of an Aristotelian interpretation of quantum
mechanics, aiming to remain as faithful as possible to Aristotle’s
metaphysical framework.
For more information on "Physics meets Philosophy", see
https://sites.google.com/view/physphilvienna
Best wishes
Sebastian
Liebe alle,
wir laden herzlich zur nächsten Fakultätsöffentlichen Präsentation von Dissertationsprojekten der Philosophie (FöP) ein.
Am Mittwoch, den 4. Juni 2025 präsentieren drei Kandidat*innen ihre Dissertationsvorhaben im Hörsaal 2G (NIG, 2. Stock).
Im Anschluss an die Präsentationen laden wir zu einem Austausch bei Sekt und Sushi ein.
Programm:
13:15 Uhr
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich: Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Betreuung:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
13:45 Uhr
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Betreuung:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
14:15 Uhr
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination. Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Betreuung:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Ihre Teilnahme!
Die Einladung kann gerne mit interessierten Personen geteilt werden.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Studienprogrammleitung Doktoratsstudium Philosophie (SPL 43)
***
Dear all,
We warmly invite you to the next Public Faculty Presentation of Dissertation Projects in Philosophy (FöP).
On Wednesday, June 4, 2025 at 1:15 p.m. in Lecture Hall 2G (NIG, 2nd floor), three candidates will present their dissertation projects.
Following the presentations, we once again invite you to join us for a reception with sparkling wine and sushi.
Programme:
1:15 p.m.
Boda Liu, BA MA
Das Leib-Ich: Reflexionen aus der Perspektive der generativen Phänomenologie
Supervisor:
Mag. Dr. Michael Staudigl, Privatdoz.
1:45 p.m.
Eric Archambault, MA
Essays on Aristotle and philosophy of mathematics
Supervisor:
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Georg Schiemer
2:15 p.m.
Peter Schneider, BA MA
Morbide Faszination. Zum persönlichen und theoretischen Verhältnis von Georges Bataille und Simone Weil
Supervisor:
Assoz. Prof. Mag. Mag. Dr. Dr. Esther Heinrich, Privatdoz.
We are very much looking forward to your participation!
Feel free to share this invitation with anyone who might be interested.
With best wishes,
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Holger Moritz
Director of the Doctoral Program in Philosophy (SPL 43)