Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Kosmas Brousalis (IVC Fellow, University
of Athens), who will give a talk on June 11, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Kosmas Brousalis (IVC Fellow,
University of Athens)*
Confronting Tensions in Epistemic Structural Realism: Insights from
the Logical Positivist Tradition
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
*
Date:* 11/06/2026
*
Time:* 16h45
*
Venue:* New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS 3C
*
Abstract:*
Epistemic structural realism (ESR) is a moderate realist position
according to which our knowledge of the unobservable world is limited to
its "structure" rather than its "nature." This thesis is commonly
explicated using Ramsey sentences and is thereby equated with the claim
that, for any successful scientific theory, the most we can be realists
about is the propositional content captured by its Ramsey sentence. ESR
is typically motivated by two considerations: semantic and
epistemological. On the one hand, it is taken to follow from a
descriptivist Carnap–Lewis semantics of theoretical terms; on the other,
it is presented as the only realist epistemological position capable of
accommodating revolutionary theory change. In this talk, I argue that
endorsing both considerations results in inconsistency. After clarifying
the tension and outlining the desiderata for any adequate resolution, I
propose a novel variant of ESR, which I call "Multiplicative ESR."
Roughly speaking, this view counsels epistemic restraint regarding the
prospects of veridically "visualizing" unobservable entities—that is,
representing them using observational concepts rooted in our sensory
experience of the macroscopic world. I then motivate Multiplicative ESR,
explore its (possibly troubling) implications, and examine the
relationship between key tenets of this view and themes in the logical
positivist tradition.