Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the upcoming talk of the APSE - lecture
series, delivered by Stephanie Ifill (University of Westminster)
Title: Knowledge as a turn towards the possibility of existence
When/Where: 12.10., 15-17pm, HS 3A
If you are interested in joining us for dinner/drinks afterwards, write
an email to Manu Sharma (manu.sharma(a)univie.ac.at)! everyone welcome!
Abstract:
"I came to realise that to produce knowledge, I must enter into a
framework where I am non-existent....I refused...There must be another
possibility, another way of knowing." This talk brings forward the
question: what is the possibility of epistemic non-existence? One of the
possibilities I raise is that of the turn. The turn is not a seek of
inclusion in; it's a turn, a break from. I turn in relation to Sylvia
Wynter (to rupture) and Henri Bergson (to indetermination) to help
articulate what I mean by epistemic turn. Upon awareness, there is the
possibility to turn from, indeed with a cost, but a possibility none the
less. This talk represents the culmination of deep thought brought out
through relational conversations and a direct lived confrontation with
epistemic non-existence; it's part of an ongoing experiment in the
possibility of appearing in Europe as a *Black woman (outside of the
cage).
Kind regards,
Sophie Veigl on behalf of the APSE-Unit
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Dear Colleagues,
Knowledge in Crisis is hosting its next public event on 21 February at the Billrothhaus. Please check out the details & register here<https://events.ceu.edu/2024-02-21/why-do-we-disagree-about-politics-role-kn…>.
Why Do We Disagree About Politics?
The Role of Knowledge in Democratic Societies
Panel Discussion and Reception
21 February 2024
19:30 - 22:00
Billrothhaus | Frankgasse 8, 1090 Wien
Doors open at 19:00. Registration required.
"Democracy is a mechanism for distributing knowledge about matters of public interest, allowing us to decide which politicians should govern." This popular view paints the picture that a politician's role is to inform voters about what is in our best interest. Losing elections, then, must be the result of ineffective communication: "If only we'd managed to get our message across to people properly", the story goes, "then they would have seen why they had to vote for us!"
This picture clearly falls short of the messy reality of politics. But why? Does it portray an overly rationalistic picture of the democratic process? Is this picture overly idealistic? Does it overestimate the importance of (conveying) knowledge in democratic decisionmaking? Does it overestimate the potential for people to know what is in their best interest? How can we even determine what a person's "best interest" truly is?
Speakers:
Michael Ignatieff (Historian, former politician, Rector Emeritus at Central European University)
Oliver Traldi (Philosopher at Princeton University, author of the forthcoming book Political Beliefs)
Åsa Wikforss (Philosopher at Stockholm University, member of the Swedish Academy, Director of the Knowledge Resistance project)
The discussion will be moderated by Eva Stanzl, journalist at the Wiener Zeitung.
All the best,
Jason Means
Jason Means, MA
Director of Management and Transfer
FWF Cluster of Excellence Knowledge in Crisis
Department of Philosophy
Pronouns: He/Him
[cid:image001.jpg@01DA52AC.767EB980]
+43 1 25230 7538
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-d-means/>
Workshop on Logic and Its Philosophy
This workshop brings together early career researchers in areas of
philosophy that intersect with logic (including philosophical logic,
philosophy of logic, and philosophy of mathematics) to discuss on-going
work.
08.02.2024 -- 09.02.2024
Neues Institutsgebäude HS 3B, 3. Stock, Universitätstrasse 7, 1090 Wien
Please contact Andrew Tedder ( <mailto:ajtedder.at@gmail.com>
ajtedder.at(a)gmail.com) with questions.
Dear Colleagues,
There is an open call for participants (at the master, doctoral, and
postdoctoral level) in the univie:summer school “Ways of Doing
Philosophy: East and West” that is organized by our doctoral researchers
at the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy.
Abstract:
Nowadays, the term philosophy is a common currency across cultures,
university curricula, and public discourses around the world. But what
happens when φιλοσοφία (philosophia) meets contemporary philosophy and
its non-Western counterparts such as Chinese zhexue 哲學? The term
encompasses a plethora of conceptions of philosophical practices that
vary between East and West cultures.
This edition of the Summer School will provide a platform for
participants to explore and learn from the plurality of philosophical
subjects, methods, and purposes. In addition, the Summer School will
focus on the past and present bridges between ancient and
modern/contemporary philosophy, as well as between Western and
non-Western philosophical traditions, and on the global lessons about
philosophy that can be drawn from these interactions.
The summer school will, in addition, host keynote lectures on Western
Philosophy (with a focus on Ancient Greek Philosophy) and Eastern
Philosophy (Daoism, Confucianism and Indian Philosophy).
All the relevant information can be found here:
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/summer-sch…
Dates: 25-30 July 2024
Location: Neues Institutsgebäude, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien
The deadline for applications is March 15, 2024.
Contact email: vdp.summerschool.2024(a)gmail.com
We would be very grateful if you could help us to spread this call to
your colleagues and students worldwide. Thank you very much for your
support!
Best,
Raphael Aybar
Dear Colleagues,
There is a job opening for six PhD positions (four years, fixed term) in
all areas of philosophy in our department.
The announcements can be found here:
Three PhD Positions in Philosophy at the University of Vienna - Cluster
of Excellence:
https://philjobs.org/job/show/25742
Three PhD Positions in Philosophy at the University of Vienna - PACE
Project:
https://philjobs.org/job/show/25738
The deadline for applications is March 6, 2024. Applicants can apply for
both simultaneously.
We would be very grateful if you could help us to spread this call to
your colleagues and students worldwide. Thank you very much for your
support!
Best regards,
Raphael Aybar
im Namen von Prof. Karamanolis laden wir Sie zu den zwei
Veranstaltungen am 25.01 ein:
1. Workshop zu Origen: An early Christian Philosopher (c. 185-254)
When & Where:
Hörsaal 3A
Thursday 26.1.2024
10.00-12.30
Introduction: George Karamanolis: Main Philosophical issues in Origen᾽s
Philosophy
Vito Limone (Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele): Origen and
Methodius on the Resurrected Body
Mehr Information unten:
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
______
2. Workshop: Readings in Christianity: The Case of C. P. Cavafy
25. Jänner 2024
Ort: Institut für Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik, Postgasse 9, 3. Stock
Programme:
13:30: Opening Words
14:00: George Karamanolis (University of Vienna): "Cavafy's ancient
Christianity"
14:40-14:50: Coffee Break
14:50-15:30: Katerina Kostiou (University of Patras): "Cavafy's
construction of poetic personae: 'Julian in Nicomedia' and repetition as
complentarity"
15:30-15:40: Coffee Break
15:40-16:20: Vasiliki Dimoula (University of Vienna): "Christian
Pleasures: Reading Christianity's Historians through a fin-de-siècle lens"
16:20-16:30: Coffee Break
16:30-17:10: Martha Vassiliadi (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki):
"Refiguring Cavafy's Salome: The female hero and the storytelling mechanism"
17:10-17:30: Coffee Break
17:30-18:10: Maria Boletsi (Leiden University and University of
Amsterdam): "From Christianity to capitalism and Back: Cavafy's Noonday
Demon"
18:10-19:00: General Discussion, Conclusions
20:00: Workshop's Dinner
Mehr information unten:
https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/news-events/nachrichten-news-events/detail…
Dear colleagues,
I'm pleased to invite you to our next APSE talk on Thursday, 25th
January 2024, 3:00 (s.t.) - 5:00 p.m. in HS 3A, 3. OG, NIG.
The speaker is Professor Stella Villarmea (Complutense University of
Madrid & University of Oxford). She will be speaking about:
"Birthing: Vindicating a Visceral Body Philosophically"
Abstract:
Birth matters matter — and they matter philosophically too. I work on
philosophy of birth, that is, I use the tools of philosophy to analyse
representations and practices around childbirth. My thesis is that to
reorient philosophical conversation toward birth and, specifically, to
the origin of our lives in the female body, produces a radical shift.
Once we take that turn, many of the tales about our origin truly become
'old-tales'. Are we already imagining a new genealogy, a new logos for
genos? Can we philosophically (and medically/obstetrically) represent
and vindicate this new genea-logy?
The talk will be followed by a dinner. Please let me know if you would
like to join.
I'm looking forward to seeing you.
Best wishes,
Anne Sophie
--
"The Metaphysics of Development and Evolution: From Thing Ontology to
Process Ontology", Human Development, online first:
https://doi.org/10.1159/000534421
"Emergent Properties", in: The Routledge Handbook of Properties, ed. by
A.-S. Maurin & A. Fisher (pp.347-357), Routledge
"The Metaphysics of Living Consciousness: Metabolism, Agency and
Purposiveness", Biosemiotics 16 (2023), 281–290:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-023-09531-0www.annesophiemeincke.com
Elise Richter Research Fellow
Institute of Philosophy
University of Vienna
Universitätsstraße 7
1010 Vienna, Austria
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Colloquium einladen.
Termin: 25.01.2024, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3F, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: "CLINAMEN - Bewegtbilder des Denkens" – An der Grenze zwischen Philosophie und Kunst mit einer Performance von Noemi Call und Philipp Quell
Beschreibung: Sarah Kofman wirft in ihrer Beschreibung der Paarung von Kunst und Philosophie eine Frage auf: „Aus der Kunst eine philosophische Frage machen, einen Diskurs über die Kunst führen, der sich diesem System von Oppositionen beugt, heißt das nicht die Herrschaftsgeste der Philosophie zu wiederholen, die immer die Kunst dem Logos und der Wahrheit unterordnen wollte?"(Kofman 1990, "Die Melancholie der Kunst" in: Postmoderne und Dekonstruktion, 224)
Die Beziehung zwischen Philosophie und Kunst scheint in einer Sackgasse zu sein. Entweder die Philosophie spricht "über" die Kunst und will erklären, was sie "eigentlich" bedeutet, oder sie muss sie unberührt und für sich selbst sprechen lassen. Doch gibt es neben dieser erstarrten Opposition alternative Wege, Holzwege oder Schleichwege vielleicht, die Kunst und Philosophie in einen "Dialog auf Augenhöhe" bringen? In einem Dialog mit dem Videokünstler H. Arcier, der in seinem Werk die atomistische Kosmologie zum Anstoß nimmt, um eine ganz neue Perspektive auf den Tanz zu eröffnen, wollen wir mit einem performativ-philosophischen Text antworten, indem wir Figuren und Impressionen des Videokunstwerks sprachlich verarbeiten und weiterspinnen.
Den Link zu dem Video findet ihr hier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOXJl6zD9gw
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf euer Kommen!
Mit lieben Grüßen im Namen von Khôra
Sebastian Krach
Dear colleagues,
on behalf of Univ.-Prof. Angela Kallhoff and the Department of
Philosophy, I cordially invite you to a guest lecture titled
*"Humankind’s Common Cultural Heritage, Justice and Territorial Rights"*
by *Cecile Fabre *(All Souls College, Oxford).
Thu Dec. 14th, 2023, 6:30 p.m. in HS 3D (NIG)
For questions, contact sophie.kroiss(a)univie.ac.at
Abstract:
The thought that there are cultural landmarks which have universal value
is a familiar one. It is at the heart of UNESCO's and the World
Heritage's mission, and is affirmed in a number of international
declarations, not least the Convention Concerning the Protection of
World Cultural and Natural Heritage. For all its appeal, UNESCO's ideals
raise some deep concerns. In particular, it is not easy to articulate an
account of universal value; and it is not easy to show why we are under
moral obligations in respect of that heritage. Nevertheless, I attempt
to defend those ideals. I seek to show that the protection of
humankind's heritage, qua humankind's, not only is a moral imperative:
more strongly put, it is a duty of justice. I then address one of the
most important objections to it - namely that it undermines states’ and
their citizenries’ legitimate interest in deciding what to do with
landmarks which are located on their territory.
/Cecile Fabre a political philosopher, and currently Senior Research
Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford. She is also Professor of Political
Philosophy at the University of Oxford, and affiliated with the Faculty
of Philosophy, the Department of Politics and International Relations,
and Nuffield College, Oxford. Her research interests are in theories of
distributive justice; the philosophy of democracy; just war theory; the
ethics of foreign policy, with particular focus on the ethics of
economic statecraft and the ethics of espionage.
She most recently published Spying Through a Glass Darkly: The Ethics of
Espionage and Counter-Intelligence (Oxford University Press 2022);
Economic Statecraft: Human Rights, Sanctions, and Conditionality
(Harvard University Press, 2018), preceded by (among others)
Cosmopolitan Peace (Oxford University Press, 2016), The Morality of
Defensive War, co-edited with Seth Lazar (Oxford University Press,
2014), Cosmopolitan War (Oxford University Press, 2012)./
https://kalender.univie.ac.at/einzelansicht/?no_cache=1&tx_univieevents_pi1…
/
/