Dear All,
The "Wittgen=steine" series (organized by the Wittgenstein Research
Group) features two talks this term:
April 12th, 2024; 3:00pm to 4:30pm, HS 3A:
Pavel Arazim: "Therapie(n) als Methode(n) -- warum und wie? Vergleich
der Antiphilosophie Wittgensteins und Bergsons"
May 14th, 2024: 3:00pm to 4:30pm, HS 3A:
Anna Boncompagni: "Once more with feeling" A feminist-Wittgensteinian
take on language and liberation"
Abstracts:
Pavel Arazim: "Therapie(n) als Methode(n) - warum und wie?"
Wittgenstein wurde bereits mit vielen Autor:innen verglichen, kaum aber
mit Bergson. Dabei war er wohl der populärste Philosoph unmittelbar
bevor Wittgenstein bekannt wurde. Schon deshalb liegt es nahe, die
Möglichkeit eines Einflusses zu untersuchen. Darüber hinaus wurden beide
Autoren von William James inspiriert und entwickeln seinen Ansatz
weiter, philosophische Probleme eher aufzulösen, statt sie zu lösen.
Folgende Fragen sollen im Vortrag behandelt werden: Was bedeutet es für
Bergson und Wittgenstein, dass eine philosophische Frage verschwinden
soll? Inwiefern lässt sich dieser Zugang als allgemeine Auffassung der
Philosophie verteidigen? Soll also Philosophie keine Thesen aufstellen
und mit welcher Begründung? Womöglich hilft Bergsons Zugang zu Bewegung
und Veränderung zum besseren Verständnis dessen, was Wittgenstein zu
dieser Methodologie führen konnte. Die Wirklichkeit ist lebendig und
dynamisch, und deswegen kann sie nicht mittels verallgemeinernder
Begriffe ausgedrückt werden. Mein Anliegen besteht darin aufzuzeigen,
wie sich dieser therapeutische und anti-theoretische Zugang im
Verständnis der Normativität bei beiden Autoren widerspiegelt.
Anna Boncompagni: "Once more with feeling ..."
Recent work in feminist epistemology and philosophy of language
highlights how language use contributes to oppressive practices. For
instance, Tirrell (2012), building on Wilfrid Sellars and Robert
Brandom, analyzes the normative power of derogatory terms and how they
engender harmful actions and behaviors. McGowan (2019), developing David
Lewis' approach, claims that conversational contributions enact norms
and permissibility facts both within the conversation and in social
practices, thereby constituting harms and keeping oppressive practices
in place. Both perspectives are indebted to the Wittgensteinian notion
of language games. In this paper, I retrace this inheritance and further
argue for a Wittgensteinian understanding of these phenomena, also
appealing to his concepts of rule-following and forms of life. However,
rather than oppression, I apply these insights to liberation: I claim
that certain moves in language games enact positive changes in social
norms and forms of life. In particular, I apply this approach to
linguistic moves related to LGBTQ issues. This Wittgensteinian-feminist
framework, I argue, helps better understand both the difficulties and
the potentialities of liberatory and innovative conversational moves.
Everybody welcome!
Best wishes from the organizers,
Esther Heinrich
Anja Weiberg
Martin Kusch
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
im Anhang schicke ich Ihnen den Aushang für die kommende FÖP der DSPL43
( Philosophie) am Mittwoch, 15.05.2024 ab 13.30. Bitte beachten Sie,
dass die FÖP dieses Semester vor Ort im Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG)
stattfindet.
--
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached the schedule for our next faculty-public
presentation (FÖP) of doctoral research projects on Wednesday, 15 May
2024 from 1.30 p.m. onwards. Please note that this semester the FÖP will
be held on site in Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG).
Mit besten Grüßen,
With best wishes,
Benjamin Schnieder, DSPL43
Liebe Kolleg_innen,
wir möchten Sie herzlich zu den Veranstaltungender Vortragsreihe
„Phänomenologische Forschungen“ im Sommersemester 2024 einladen(siehe
auch Attachment Plakat anbei):
*16.05.2024*
*Ruud Welten (Erasmus University Rotterdam)*
- VORTRAG: Do., 16.05.2025, 18.30–20.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 2H, Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
/Levinas and Lacan: Reflections on Language and Psychosis/
*20./21.06.2024*
*Thomas Fuchs (Universität Heidelberg)*
- VORTRAG: Do., 20.06.2024, 18.30–20.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 3D, Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
/Verteidigung des Menschen. Plädoyer für einen verkörperten Humanismus/
- WORKSHOP: Fr., 21.06.2024, 09.00–12.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 2H, Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
Texte und Informationen zum Workshop: gerhard.unterthurner(a)univie.ac.at
Neben der Veranstaltung mit Thomas Fuchs in den „Phänomenologischen
Forschungen“ gibt es einen weiteren von der Integrativen Gestalttherapie
- Fachsektion im ÖAGG veranstalteten Workshop mit ihm am 21.06.2024 mit
dem Titel „Phänomenologie als Grundlage der Psychotherapie“, der sich an
Ausbildungskandidat_innen, Psychotherapeut_innen richtet, aber auch für
Externe offen ist (siehe Attachment).
Organisation: Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner in Zusammenarbeit
mit Florian Schmidsberger
https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…
<https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…>
In Kooperation mit Gruppe Phänomenologie
Mit besten Grüßen,
Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner
Dear Colleagues,
We are happy to invite you to the next session of the Work-In-Progress
series in a week, on Thursday 2nd May. There will be two presentations,
given by Mariia Fedorova and Zachary Daus. Detailed information is
below:
When & Where: Thursday, May 2, 17:15 - 18:45, Hörsaal 3A (NIG,
Universitätsstraße 7)
1st Presentation: Speaker: Mariia Fedorova.
Title: On Virtues and Vices of Imaginative Constraints
Abstract:
Several philosophers have recently argued that imagination can be
epistemically useful when it is properly constrained by reality.
Nevertheless, the nature of the so-called imaginative constraints has
remained a contentious matter. On the one hand, it is believed that
imagination is constrained by one’s beliefs about the world which are
readily accessible to introspection and available for voluntary control.
I refer to this view as the voluntary-imaginative-constraints view
(VIC). On the other hand, given the shared cognitive architecture of
perception and imagination, imaginative constraints are stipulated to
take the form of perceptual regularities, inaccessible to consciousness
and, by extension, out of voluntary control. Call this view the
architectural-imaginative-constraints view (AIC). Prima facie, VIC and
AIC are compatible. It seems plausible to suppose that imagination can
be constrained by one’s beliefs about the world as well as by perceptual
regularities. Under closer examination, however, the advocates of VIC
and AIC appear to talk about one and the same kind of imaginative
constraints - the imaginer’s background knowledge of her environment.
The key difference between VIC and AIC lies in the relationship they
take to obtain between the imaginer and her knowledge. This puts
pressure on the apparent compatibility of VIC and AIC and challenges us
to make a choice between treating the imaginer’s knowledge as (i)
consciously accessible and controlled or as (ii) inaccessible to
consciousness and out of voluntary control. If we favour (i),
imagination’s reliability is in jeopardy. If we favour (ii), its
epistemic value is compromised. Fortunately, a dual-system model of
imagination as proposed by Michael Stuart offers a way out of this
dilemma. Instead of distinguishing different types of imaginative
constraints, we can distinguish different ways of exercising
imagination, one of which is consciously accessible and controlled,
while the other is unconscious and automatic.
2nd Presentation: Speaker: Zachary Daus.
Title: Distribution, Recognition and the Politics
of Justice in Medical AI.
Abstract:
Advocates of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine suggest that one
of its greatest benefits is its ability to resolve issues in the
distribution of scarce medical resources. While there is real potential
for medical AI to alleviate medical resource scarcity and consequently
contribute to a more just distribution of medical resources, this would
come at a cost to justice as recognition. A biased clinical decision
support system (CDSS), for example, may result in more distributively
just outcomes by expanding access to medical care, but at a cost to the
mis-recognition of minorities and women. Should such a CDSS be tolerated
for its improvement in distribution at its cost to recognition?
Similarly a black box CDSS, for example, may arrive at decisions that
are incapable of meaningful explanations despite expanding access to
medical care. Must such systems incur the cost of being engineered for
explainability in order to ensure that they do not mis-recognize humans
qua rational agents? In light of these and similar issues, I argue that
one of the predominant theories of justice that guides the distribution
of medical resources—Norman Daniels's Rawls-inspired accountability for
reasonableness (AFR)—must be either supplemented or replaced by a theory
of justice as recognition, and consider the theories of recognition
developed by Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth as potential candidates.
There are refreshments and snacks. And all are invited to join for
dinner or drinks afterward.
Please let us know (wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at) if you have any
questions or if you would like to present for the Work-in-Progress
series yourself. You can find calendar and event information
at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/.
Best wishes and we hope to see you there!
The organizing team
Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the upcoming talk of the APSE - lecture
series, delivered by Stephanie Ifill (University of Westminster)
Title: Knowledge as a turn towards the possibility of existence
When/Where: 12.10., 15-17pm, HS 3A
If you are interested in joining us for dinner/drinks afterwards, write
an email to Manu Sharma (manu.sharma(a)univie.ac.at)! everyone welcome!
Abstract:
"I came to realise that to produce knowledge, I must enter into a
framework where I am non-existent....I refused...There must be another
possibility, another way of knowing." This talk brings forward the
question: what is the possibility of epistemic non-existence? One of the
possibilities I raise is that of the turn. The turn is not a seek of
inclusion in; it's a turn, a break from. I turn in relation to Sylvia
Wynter (to rupture) and Henri Bergson (to indetermination) to help
articulate what I mean by epistemic turn. Upon awareness, there is the
possibility to turn from, indeed with a cost, but a possibility none the
less. This talk represents the culmination of deep thought brought out
through relational conversations and a direct lived confrontation with
epistemic non-existence; it's part of an ongoing experiment in the
possibility of appearing in Europe as a *Black woman (outside of the
cage).
Kind regards,
Sophie Veigl on behalf of the APSE-Unit
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Summer School
Call for Applications
(Deadline: April 1, 2024 extended: April 30, 2024)
22nd univie: summer school Scientific World Conceptions (USS-SWC)
EuropEAN SUMMER SCHOOL on the philosophy of mathematics
in cooperation with
EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS (ESPM)
<https://philmath.eu/> https://philmath.eu/
Vienna, September 9-13, 2024
The second European Summer School on the Philosophy of Mathematics will
focus on different topics in the philosophy of mathematics, its foundations,
as well as on the philosophy of mathematical practice. We are happy to
invite abstract submissions by graduate students (MA and PhD). The School
will be hosted in person at the University of Vienna and will include three
tutorials by distinguished scholars as well as a training unit on
"Quantitative and qualitative empirical methods for philosophers of
mathematics" by Matthew Inglis and Deborah Kant (provided by the CIPSH Chair
DMRCP ("Diversity of Mathematical Research Cultures and Practices").
The school aims to bring together Master and PhD students interested in the
connection between philosophy and mathematics, giving them the opportunity
to discuss related topics with leading scholars in the field.
Topics will be selected reflecting participants interests and may include:
* Mathematical knowledge and mathematical understanding
* Justification and representation in mathematics
* Informal proofs and mathematical rigor
* The role of intuition and diagrams in mathematical reasoning
* Experimental mathematics and mathematical practice
* Mathematical ontology
Lecturers:
Jessica Carter (Aarhus University)
<https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177
bcfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html>
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177b
cfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html
Yacin Hamami (ETH Zurich)
<https://www.yacinhamami.com> https://www.yacinhamami.com
Leon Horsten (University of Konstanz)
<https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/>
https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/
The program is primarily directed at graduate students and junior
researchers in relevant fields, but the organizers also encourage
applications from people in all stages of their career.
Application form and further information:
<https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/>
https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/
USS-SWC operates under the academic supervision of an International Program
Committee of distinguished philosophers, historians, and scientists. Its
members represent the scientific fields in the scope of USS-SWC, make
contact to their home universities and will also support acknowledgement of
courses taken by the students. The annual summer school is organised by the
Institute Vienna Circle of the University of Vienna.
<https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/> https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/
Find information about our exchange programme with Duke University (North
Carolina) here:
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-
wide-partnership-agreements/north-america/>
https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-w
ide-partnership-agreements/north-america/
Inquiries:
Administrator:
Zarah Weiss
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:summerschool.ivc@univie.ac.at> summerschool.ivc(a)univie.ac.at
Scientific director:
Georg Schiemer
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:georg.schiemer@univie.ac.at> georg.schiemer(a)univie.ac.at
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Jesús Zamora Bonilla, who will give a
talk on April 25, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM TALK: JESÚS ZAMORA BONILLA
ON OBSERVATIONAL STATEMENTS AS EPISTEMIC PUBLIC GOODS: AN INFERENTIALIST
RECONSTRUCTION OF NEURATH'S PROTOKOLLSÄTZE
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 25/04/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
Philosophical discussions have tended to concentrate much more on how
observational statements are 'theory laden' than on what is what makes
them observational to begin with. After discrediting the notion of a
'purely observational language' or the existence of 'pure sense data',
consensus has apparently been that it is a concern for the practicing
scientists themselves to determine by acquaintance or familiarity what
counts in each case as an 'observation', without the possibility of
having something like a 'general philosophical theory of scientific
observation'. Without denying the role of contextual and tacit knowledge
in the process of determining what can be taken as an observational
statement, this talk tries to recover Otto Neurath's idea of
Protokolsätze by immersing it in an inferentialist account of scientific
activity (or 'science as a game of persuasion') and by employing some
concepts derived from economics and game theory, in particular Milgrom's
notion of 'public events' as a possible solution of the problem of
common knowledge in games of coordination. Further consequences are
derived in regard of the relation between private and public knowledge,
and about the revisability of observational information.
Dear all,
this is just a reminder that tomorrow is UVienna's Work-In-Progress Series with Jesús Zamora Bonilla (Visiting Scholar from UNED).
When? Thursday, April 18, 17:00 - 18:30
Where? Hörsaal 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße 7)
Title: "Reflections on the ontology of social problems"
Abstract:
The aim of this talk is to explore the entangledness of social problems with both the positive and normative aspects of social reality and social ideas, and connect it with a variety of debates within the social ontology literature. Despite the broad scope of this field, 'social problems' are conspicuously missing as an independent category. This omission is intriguing since many of the listed topics (like Group Agency, Organizations, Money, Race, Gender, and Disability, etc.) are inherently linked to various kinds of social problems. This dearth of attention to social problems is also reflected in academic databases like The Philosopher's Index, which yield zero results when searching for "ontology" and "social problem" together. The neglect of social problems within the academic field of social ontology is not due to a lack of significance attached to them by social scientists themselves: disciplines like economics and sociology recognize the centrality of social problems and have dedicated a lot of work to their study. Some arguments in favour of the centrality of social problems are the following: first, in many philosophical theories, from pragmatism to existentialism, ‘reality’ is not merely a question of, say, ‘brute existence’, but something that emerges in front of humans as a kind of resistance (or, as Heidegger would have put it, as a kind of Unzuhandenheit). In this sense, problems would probably be the ‘most real’ things for humans (and perhaps for living beings in general), and social problems would count amongst the ‘hardest’ social facts we can encounter as inhabitants of the social world. Second, something similar happens at the level of the social sciences, whose main direct motivation is very likely the attempt of understanding the social world in order to help to solve some of the problems that afflict the members of the societies to which social scientists themselves belong. These arguments point to the conclusion that the most reasonable approaches to the ontology of social problems will have to pay considerable attention to items and ideas coming from phenomenology.
Everyone is most cordially invited to join us for dinner or drinks afterward. If possible, please let us know in advance by email.
You can write to wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:wip.philosophie@univie.ac.at> if you have any questions or would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series. Calendar and event information can be found at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team
(Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian Fleisch, Mark Basafa, Sophie Veigl, Raphael Aybar, Nianzu Tu)
Dear all,
The Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy invites you to the next
Pragmatic Academic event on
"Academic Publishing in Philosophy Journals", which will take place on
Friday, April 19th, from 14:00 to 16:00 in room 2G, NiG.
This time, Prof. Benjamin Schnieder, Prof. Paulina Sliwa and Dr. Sophie
Veigl will share their insider experiences and answer questions such as
Should I publish research articles as a PhD student?
Where should I publish?
What happens when I submit a manuscript to a journal?
Participants can send their questions in advance to
vd.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at.
The full event description is available at
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/events/details/news/academic-publishing-…
We look forward to seeing you there. Please feel free to share this
invitation with others who may be interested.
Raphael Aybar
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
wir laden Sie herzlich zum Gastvortrag von Prof. Jörg Robert (Tübingen)
anlässlich des 300. Geburtstages von Immanuel Kant ein:
„FREIHEIT DER KUNST? – KANT UND DIE ERFINDUNG DER ÄSTHETISCHEN AUTONOMIE“
18. April, 19:00 – 20:30
Marietta-Blau-Saal, Universität Wien
Weitere Infos unter:
https://neugermanistik-wien.at/event/freiheit-der-kunst-kant-und-die-erfind…
Eine Anmeldung ist nicht erforderlich.
Wir freuen uns auf Ihr Kommen!
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Lydia Rammerstorfer
--
Univ.- Ass. Mag. Lydia Rammerstorfer
Institut für Germanistik
Universität Wien
Universitätsring 1
1010 Wien
Zimmer: ZG 102.33
Tel.: +43-1-4277-42285
lydia.rammerstorfer(a)univie.ac.at
rammersl(a)hu-berlin.de