CfP: ECPR General Conference 2024 | University College Dublin | Section
of the Standing Group on Kantian Political Thought
The ECPR Standing Group on Kantian Political Thought is delighted to
announce that its application for a section on "Kant, Science and
Politics" as part of the ECPR General Conference (University College
Dublin, 12-15 August 2024) has been successful, and 6 panels have been
allocated to the Section.
As a result, paper and panel proposals for the section "Kant, Science
and Politics" are now invited. Paper proposals may either be submitted
as part of one of the five suggested panels below or as part of a new
panel on a topic related to that of the section. The aim of this section
is to examine Kant's view of a practical metaphysics (both in ethics and
politico-juridical philosophy) that is on the secure path of science;
the following are suggested panel topics:
* The Relation Between Theoretical and Practical Cognitions
* Kant's Conception of Moral Theory as a Philosophical Science
* The "Land of Truth" - The Political Language of Scientific Truth
* Autonomy and the Moral Law
* Science and Racism - Kant's Anthropology and the Need for
Reorientation of Kant Scholarship
You may find further details on the section here: Kant, Science and
Politics (ecpr.eu) [1].
If you are interested, please send an Expression of Interest with a
short outline of your paper (max. 500 words) or, if applicable, of the
proposed panel to jakob.rendl(a)univie.ac.at and s.baiasu(a)keele.ac.uk by
11 January 2024, or contact us for more information.
All welcome!
Links:
------
[1] https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/SectionDetails/1470
Dear all,
on behalf of the APSE Group (Applied Philosophy of Science and
Epistemology), I would like to remind you about the talk by Aleksandra
Derra (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland), which will
happen ONLINE tomorrow, December 14th, 2023 from 15:00 - 17:00.
Please find the abstract & link below!
Please also forward this invite to others who could be interested.
Title: Another Science is Possible. The Role of Feminist Theory in
Building Socially Responsible Scientific Knowledge
Londa Schiebinger, in her book entitled ‘Has Feminism Changed Science’
(2001), has shown how the growing number of female scientists gradually
transformed specific fields of science. Following her reasoning, I want
to point out how feminist theories influence the way we think about
science in the philosophy of science and science and technology studies
today, and additionally indicate how the critical feminist approach
affects the priorities, methodologies, and aims of the particular fields
of knowledge.
In the first step, following Janet Kourany, I will explain what a
socially responsible philosophy of science is. Then I will show what it
means to adopt a feminist perspective in science and to include a gender
perspective in research. Then, I will present research results that
indicate that science as an institution is entangled in broader cultural
processes that perpetuate stereotypes (e.g. Draw a Scientist experiment,
visualization of a female scientist, the role of material culture).
Finally, I will present two examples of building complementary, socially
responsible scientific knowledge, enriched with a critical feminist
perspective: neurofeminism and data feminism.
Link:
Thema: Talk Alsksandra Derra
Uhrzeit: 14.Dez. 2023 03:00 PM Wien
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/61822709658?pwd=MzgvRTJ4dUxwQitrR09FNVRGRXVWQT09
Meeting-ID: 618 2270 9658
Kenncode: 0000
All the beste on behalf of the APSE Group,
Flora
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Dear all,
on behalf of the APSE Group (Applied Philosophy of Science and
Epistemology), I would like to cordially invite you to the following
talk by Aleksandra Derra
(Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland), which will happen
ONLINE on December 14th, 2023 from 15:00 - 17:00. Please find the
abstract & link below!
Please also forward this invite to others who could be interested.
Title: Another Science is Possible. The Role of Feminist Theory in
Building Socially Responsible Scientific Knowledge
Londa Schiebinger, in her book entitled ‘Has Feminism Changed Science’
(2001), has shown how the growing number of female scientists gradually
transformed specific fields of science. Following her reasoning, I want
to point out how feminist theories influence the way we think about
science in the philosophy of science and science and technology studies
today, and additionally indicate how the critical feminist approach
affects the priorities, methodologies, and aims of the particular fields
of knowledge.
In the first step, following Janet Kourany, I will explain what a
socially responsible philosophy of science is. Then I will show what it
means to adopt a feminist perspective in science and to include a gender
perspective in research. Then, I will present research results that
indicate that science as an institution is entangled in broader cultural
processes that perpetuate stereotypes (e.g. Draw a Scientist experiment,
visualization of a female scientist, the role of material culture).
Finally, I will present two examples of building complementary, socially
responsible scientific knowledge, enriched with a critical feminist
perspective: neurofeminism and data feminism.
Link:
Thema: Talk Alsksandra Derra
Uhrzeit: 14.Dez. 2023 03:00 PM Wien
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/61822709658?pwd=MzgvRTJ4dUxwQitrR09FNVRGRXVWQT09
Meeting-ID: 618 2270 9658
Kenncode: 0000
All the beste on behalf of the APSE Group,
Flora
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Studierenden-Werkstatt für Philosophie
Universität Würzburg
9.–10. April 2024
Call for Abstracts: Vortrag im Rahmen der 1. Würzburger
Studierenden-Werkstatt für Philosophie
Das Institut für Philosophie der Universität Würzburg lädt interessierte
Philosophie-Studierende in
fortgeschrittenen Semestern ein, ihre philosophischen Untersuchungen und
Forschungen im Rahmen
einer Studierenden-Werkstatt vorzustellen. Der Workshop soll
Studierenden der Philosophie
die Möglichkeit bieten, eigene Ideen vorzustellen, sich an einem
philosophischen Fachvortrag zu
versuchen und sich mit etablierten Forschenden im kollegialen Rahmen des
Würzburger Instituts
für Philosophie auszutauschen und zu vernetzen. Dies ermöglicht Ihnen,
ausgiebige Rückmeldungen
zu ihren Arbeiten von Würzburger Professor*innen und Mitarbeiter*innen
zu erhalten und mit
diesen in Dialog zu treten. Im Fokus steht die Einübung einer Praxis des
gemeinsamen philosophischen
Denkens.
Bei den vorgestellten Arbeiten kann es sich um Hausarbeiten,
Bachelorarbeiten, Essays oder andere
studentische Forschung, gerne auch laufende Projekte (Work in Progress),
handeln. Besonders willkommen
sind Beiträge, die sich mit den Schwerpunkten der Würzburger Forschung
befassen: Phänomenologie
und Post-Phänomenologie, antike, mittelalterliche und arabische
Philosophie. Weitere
Informationen zu Schwerpunktsetzungen des Würzburger Instituts finden
Sie hier:
https://www.philosophie.uni-wuerzburg.de/forschung/.
Die Veranstaltung ist darüber hinaus offen für Vortragsthemen in allen
Bereichen der Philosophie.
Die Vorträge sollen 15–20 Minuten lang sein, mit anschließend jeweils 10
Minuten Zeit für Diskussion,
Rückfragen und Feedback.
Die Studierenden-Werkstatt findet am 09.–10.04.2024 in den Räumen des
Instituts für Philosophie
in der Würzburger Residenz statt. Leider können Kosten für Anfahrt und
Übernachtung nicht übernommen
werden. Private Übernachtungsgelegenheiten können gegebenenfalls über
die Fachschaftsinitiative
Philosophie (https://www.hw.uni-wuerzburg.de/fsi-philosophie/)
organisiert werden.
Interessierte können sich bis zum 31.12.2023 mit einem Vortragstitel und
einem 250 Worte langen
Abstract (einer Kurzzusammenfassung des Vortrags) unter
studierendenwerkstatt-phil@uniwuerzburg.
de bewerben. Bitte geben Sie auch Ihre Studienfächer, Ihre Semesterzahl
und Ihre
Universität an. Zusagen bzw. Absagen werden im Januar 2024 verschickt
Mit freundlichen Grüßen auch im Namen des ganzen Organisationsteams,
Dr. Diego D'Angelo
Dr. Diego D'Angelo
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
Lehrstuhl für praktische Philosophie
Universität Würzburg
Residenzplatz 2
97070 Würzburg
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Colloquium einladen.
Termin: 07.12.2023, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3F, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: Seins-Verstrickungen. Über die Lebensphilosophie bei Ortega y Gasset
Ein kurzer Text von Ortega y Gasset dient uns als Ausgangspunkt für die weitere Diskussion. Auf Anfrage wird der Text gerne zugesendet.
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf euch!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
Dear Colleagues,
This is an email to remind you that the next presentations in the
Work-In-Progress series will be given by Bogdan Mićić and Philipp Quell
this coming Monday. Please see their titles and abstracts below.
"The ontological foundation of Pletho’s virtue ethics" by Bogdan Mićić
The short but dense treatise /Perì aretôn/ 'On Virtues' is not the only
work in which Pletho deals with moral-philosophical topics and
questions, but it is indeed the work in which Pletho presents and
develops his moral philosophy in the most systematic way. There is
surprising amount of literature which has been written and published
since the 1840s about Pletho's life and work. However, only a small part
of the otherwise relatively rich secondary literature is dedicated to
Plethonic ethics and an even smaller part wo the work /Perì aretôn/,
while the largest part is dealing with Pletho’s theology and
metaphysics. One reason (though, probably not the only one) for this is
that Pletho's (moral) philosophy, especially at first glance, hardly has
any originality. Further, it seems to be affected by a profound
eclecticism, which makes Plethon's ethics seem more like a disjointed
piecemeal: Different, sometimes even seemingly incompatible, thoughts of
various thinkers appear. A universal principle which could unify the
scattered thoughts seems to be lacking. In short, Pletho’s ethics, at
first glance, does not seem like a coherent theory. The eclectic
features of Pletho’s moral philosophy has led some researchers to accuse
Pletho of arbitrariness or a lack of critical reflection in advance.
This is wrong. I venture out to show that Pletho’s moral philosophy is
not a more or less arbitrary 'catalogue' of virtues collected without
adhering to an overarching principle and to show that this view is
short-sighted and excessive. To prove this, I will first show that the
Plethonic doctrine of virtue is thoroughly determined by a unifying
principle that underpins the theory. I will then identify this principle
as the ontological-metaphysical requirement for every being to adhere to
the specific ontological hierarchy. From this it will follow that it is
possible to draw conclusions about Pletho's ontology starting from his
doctrine of virtues (since the latter follows from the former). This
will prove that the relative neglect of treatise /Perì aretôn/ by
previous researchers is inappropriate not only in a historical respect
(/Perì aretôn/ was the most distributed and cited work out of Pletho’s
texts in his time), but also in a systematic respect: Because /Perì
aretôn/ provides remarkable insights in Pletho's ontology, Plethon's
doctrine of virtues should also be read and worked on also and
especially by people who are only interested in his theoretical philosophy.
In my talk, I will illustrate this by giving a detailed interpretation
of the first 14 lines of the text (/Peri aret/. A 1, 1.1–16).
"Aristotle’s Systematic Essentialism" by Philipp Quell:
Although many of Aristotle’s scientific findings are revised, for
example the geocentric thesis, his understanding of scientific
structures and the criteria for them to be able to discover truth is
still very similar to our scientific world. My thesis and argumentation
will focus on the Aristotelian system of sciences, mainly elaborated in
his logical writings. Within this argumentation one fundamental
difference will be found, too and I am excited to hear your opinon about
the fundamentality of this difference.
The presentation will take place in Hörsaal 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße
7, 3.Stock) at 13:30and will last up to sixty minutes. All are invited
to join afterwards for refreshments and snacks before the Writing
Evening begins.
Please let us know (wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at
<mailto:wip.philosophie@univie.ac.at>) if you have any questions or if
you would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series yourself. You
can findcalendar and event information
at:https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
<https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/>.
Best wishes and we hope to see all of you there!
The organizing team
Dear Colleagues,
The "Decolonizing" the Library lunchtime event has been rescheduled and
will take place on 18.1.2024 from 1 to 3 pm.
Birgit Athumani Hango from the African and Middle Eastern Studies
Library will shortly provide input (ca. 20 mins) about the Colonial
Contexts Working Group at the University Library followed by a moderated
discussion and reflections about how to apply the ideas and principles
to our own work.
Bring your lunch and join the discussion!
Sincerely,
Your Colleagues from the Antiracism Working Group
P.S. In case you missed it:
1. The Anti-Racism Working Group has created a Zotero reading list on
(Anti-)Racism, (De)colonization, and Philosophy. Most of these resources
are available via u:search.
To browse the list, as well as request to join the Zotero group, visit:
https://www.zotero.org/groups/5231402/anti-racism_working_group_at_uni_vien…
If you have a suggestion for the Zotero list, you can contact us with a
DOI/link to the item at: antiracism.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at
2. The Library of Philosophy and Psychology has designated a shelf in
the library that will house physical books related to these subjects.
The shelf features a QR-code that links to the Zotero list. So far, we
have requested 14 books to add to the Library's collection that were not
already available via u:search.
The library will be accepting purchasing requests from library users for
this shelf on an ongoing basis.
If you would like to suggest an item that is not already available via
u:search, you can do so via this link:
https://bibliothek.univie.ac.at/fb-philosophie-psychologie/ankaufsvorschlae…
--
Meghan Bohardt, M.A.
Academic and Library Information Specialist
Secretariat of the European Open Science Cloud Service Office Austria
University Library
University of Vienna
Mon, Weds-Fri 9:30-12:30
Tues 9:30-17:30
Administrative Assistant to Univ.-Prof. Tarja Knuuttila
Department of Philosophy
University of Vienna
Mon, Weds-Fri 13:30-17:30
+431427764611
_______________________________________________
Hermes mailing list --hermes(a)lists.philo.at
To unsubscribe send an email tohermes-leave(a)lists.philo.at
The Institute Vienna Circle and the Vienna Circle Society cordially
invite you to
6th Arthur Pap Lecture
What role do definitions play in axiomatics?
Paola Cantù (Université Aix-Marseille)
December 7, 2023
4 - 6 pm
Alte Kapelle am Campus, Yard 2, Entrance 2.8
Abstract
Right from its name, axiomatics focuses on the role of axioms as
starting points for deriving theorems. Definitions are introduced as
useful conventions, but not strictly necessary for a rigorous
presentation of theories. And yet the preeminent interest in definitions
in authors such as Peano and Pap suggests that the issue of definitions
cannot be eliminated as soon as one reflects on the epistemological role
of axiomatics. What role can axiomatics still play today and, within it,
what place should be reserved for definitions?
Please find further information on vcs.univie.ac.at or
https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/news-events/ . We are looking forward!
Yours sincerely
Zarah Weiss
----
6. Arthur Pap Vorlesung
What role do definitions play in axiomatics?
Paola Cantù (Université Aix-Marseille)
7. Dezember 2023
16:00 - 18:00 Uhr
Alte Kapelle am Campus, Hof 2, Eingang 2.8
Abstract
Right from its name, axiomatics focuses on the role of axioms as
starting points for deriving theorems. Definitions are introduced as
useful conventions, but not strictly necessary for a rigorous
presentation of theories. And yet the preeminent interest in definitions
in authors such as Peano and Pap suggests that the issue of definitions
cannot be eliminated as soon as one reflects on the epistemological role
of axiomatics. What role can axiomatics still play today and, within it,
what place should be reserved for definitions?
Weitere Infos finden Sie unter vcs.univie.ac.at oder
https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/news-events/. Wir freuen uns sehr auf
Ihr Kommen!
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Zarah Weiss
Dear all,
tomorrow, we will have the final event of the Anti-Racism Week at the
Department of Philosophy.
We will show the film "Edelweiss - A Critical Love Letter" at 16:45 at
HS 3C, NIG.
EDELWEISS is a documentary about the harrowing realities of People of
Color living in Austria. It depicts the perspectives of many People of
Color with varying connections to Austria— some who call it home, some
who have made it their home, and others who would never call it home.
Snacks and drinks will be provided :)
Looking forward to seeing you there!
All the best,
Flora in the name of the Anti Racism AG.
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Call for Papers (Deadline November 30, 2023)
Paul Feyerabend and Austrian Philosophy - His Formative Years in Postwar Vienna
International Conference - July 5-6, 2024 - University of Vienna, Campus, Court 1
https://www.pkfcentennial.org/
Paul K. Feyerabend (1924-1994), one of the most stimulating and controversial figures of Twentieth-Century philosophy, spent most of his formative years in postwar Vienna (1946-1955). Born in Red Vienna, Feyerabend came of age at the time of the Nazi Anschluss and completed his philosophical apprenticeship at the University of Vienna during the Allied occupation. At the time of his university studies in philosophy and physics, Feyerabend animated the so-called “Third Vienna Circle” (1949-1953) around Viktor Kraft in the context of the Austrian College Society, and actively participated in the European Forum Alpbach and in the Institut für Wissenschaft und Kunst. In addition, he served as a research assistant to Arthur Pap, who spent 1953/54 as a Fulbright visiting professor at the University of Vienna.
The international conference “Paul Feyerabend and Austrian Philosophy” aims at exploring the milieu which shaped Feyerabend’s intellectual development with a focus on his interaction with university teachers and intellectual figures such as members of the former Vienna Circle like Viktor Kraft, Philipp Frank, Herbert Feigl, and Rudolf Carnap, physicists like Felix Ehrenhaft and Walter Thirring, as well as with Walter Hollitscher and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Contacts continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s at the London School of Economics with Karl Popper and, later, with Imre Lakatos, and in Minneapolis, at Feigl’s Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, where Feyerabend published his pathbreaking “Against Method” for the first time in 1970.
A special symposium on the publication of Feyerabend’s Formative Years, edited by Matteo Collodel and Eric Oberheim (Springer Nature, two volumes) will be held as part of this conference.
The conference is organized by the Institute Vienna Circle (University of Vienna) and by the Vienna Circle Society. It is partnered with the subsequent HOPOS 2024, the Fifteenth International Congress of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, University of Vienna, July 8-12, 2024, and it contributes to the Feyerabend 2024 Centennial celebrations.
Invited Speakers
Vasso Kindi (University of Athens)
Martin Kusch (University of Vienna)
Call for Abstracts
We invite abstracts of up to 400 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography.
Please format your abstract as a pdf file for anonymous review, excluding any personal and institutional information and submit it through EasyChair <https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=pkf2024vienna> .
If your abstract is selected for the conference, you will not be required to submit a full paper.
Submission deadline: November 30, 2023
Notification of acceptance: January 31, 2024
There will be no registration fee.
Organizing Committee
Friedrich Stadler (University of Vienna)
Matteo Collodel (Ca’ Foscari University of Venice)
Daniel Kuby (University of Konstanz)
Queries and Questions
matteo.collodel[at]unive.it <http://unive.it>
friedrich.stadler[at]univie.ac.at <http://univie.ac.at>
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Colloquium einladen.
Termin: 23.11.2023, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3F, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: Philosophie des Films mit einem Input von Daniel Prem
24 Gedanken pro Sekunde: Das philosophische Potenzial des Kinos
Geschichten können seit je her philosophische Ideen beinhalten. Doch was ist mit der Form der Geschichte selbst? Erlauben uns diverse Medienformen neue philosophische Betrachtungen und Überlegungen, oder gar eine andere Art zu denken? Was ist das philosophische Potenzial, das sich zwischen den Schnitten eines Filmes versteckt?
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf euch!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
Dear All,
The Institute Vienna Circle and the APSE group are jointly organizing a
talk by ...
Prof. Anjan Chakravartty (University of Miami)
on
"Humanism and the Aim of Science: Past, Present, Future"
Time and Location:
Thursday, July 6th, 3-5pm, NIG HS 2G
Abstract: Humanism, conceived as a worldview, and science, conceived as
a form (or family of forms) of inquiry into the world, have been
entangled with one another across a long sweep of intellectual history.
I consider their co-evolution as a prelude to the present, briefly
reviewing formative aspects of Renaissance humanism and deepening
associations of values central to the Enlightenment with precursors to
modern science, en route to an arguably peculiar situation today. Where
past conceptions of the aim of science (natural philosophy, etc.) seem
intimately connected to the idea of fashioning a better world,
contemporary philosophy seems largely devoid of normative discussions of
what science itself is for, exactly. I conclude with some reflections on
a possible return to a humanist conception of the role and promise of
science.
Everyone welcome!
Best, Martin Kusch
Dear all,
unfortunately, due to a family emergency, Paul Giladi will not be able
to give the APSE talk that was planned for today at 15:00.
We will re-schedule for an online talk at some other point, and will
keep you posted.
All the best,
Flora on behalf of APSE
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Liebe alle,
ich darf euch herzlich zum morgen stattfindenden APSE-Talk von Paul
Giladi (SOAS London) einladen.
Paul ist, wie ich, Teil des Critical Political Epistemology Network:
https://cpenetwork.editorx.io/home/
Wann: Donnerstag, 16. November 2023, 15:00 - 17:00
Wo: HS 3A, NIG
Titel: ‘The Last Dogma of Empiricism’: From Auto da Fé to Epistemic
Disobedience?"
Abstract:
In this chapter, I argue that the principal philosophic depth of Hilary
Putnam’s dissolution of the fact/value dichotomy (FVD) is neither
sourced in his argument that theory selection always presupposes values,
nor in his argument that there is entanglement of fact and value in our
use of thick ethical concepts. Rather, the principal philosophic depth
mainly resides in Putnam’s charge that mainstream analytic philosophical
circles often fetishize (scientific) naturalism. Putnam’s
anti-scientism, more so than either of his entanglement theses, provides
his readers with reason to regard FVD as a type of ideology. Because of
its status as an ideology, and as therefore in the business of hegemonic
sense-making, FVD is made sense of as a real threat to inquiry, insofar
as FVD renders inquiry undemocratic by valorizing simplicity over
complexity, cleanliness over messiness, dry deserts over lush
landscapes. Putnam’s own ‘post-analytic’ pragmatist position never
ostensibly espoused any critical theoretic attitude toward modernity –
let alone formulated Ideologiekritik. Nevertheless, I think his
21st-century articulations of his conceptual pluralism may be said to
display more resonance with the decolonial concept of epistemic
disobedience than with a ‘post-analytic’ tradition Putnam himself
explicitly endorsed in his final decade: liberal naturalism. I conclude
that even though Putnam’s anti-scientistic defence of mathematically
recalcitrant phenomena may be more radical than liberal naturalist
defences of such phenomena, Putnam should be viewed as ultimately more
epistemically mischievous than epistemically disobedient.
Ich freue mich darauf, viele von euch beim Vortrag zu sehen!
Alles Liebe,
Flora im Namen von APSE
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
im Anhang schicke ich Ihnen den Aushang für die kommende FÖP der DSPL43(
Philosophie) am Mittwoch, 29.11.2023 ab 13:30. Bitte beachten Sie, dass
die FÖP dieses Semester vor Ort im Hörsaal 3C (3. Stock, NIG) stattfindet.
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached the schedule for our next faculty-public
presentation (FÖP) of doctoral research projects on Wednesday,
29.11.2023 from 13.30 p.m. onwards. Participants are welcome! Please
note that this semester the FÖP will be held onsite in Hörsaal 3C (3.
Stock, NIG).
Mit besten Grüßen,
With best wishes,
Benjamin Schnieder, DSPL43
Dear colleagues,
on behalf of Angela Kallhoff, I cordially invite you to a guest lecture
titled
*"Protecting Humankind’s Common Cultural Heritage: The Problem of
Cultural Appropriation"*
by Cecile Fabre (All Souls College, Oxford).
Thu Dec. 14th, 2023, 6:30 p.m. in HS 3D (NIG)
For questions, contact sophie.kroiss(a)univie.ac.at
Abstract:
The thought that there are cultural landmarks which have universal value
is a familiar one. It is at the heart of UNESCO's and the World
Heritage's mission, and is affirmed in a number of international
declarations, not least the Convention Concerning the Protection of
World Cultural and Natural Heritage. For all its appeal, UNESCO's ideals
raise some deep concerns. In particular, it is not easy to articulate an
account of universal value; and it is not easy to show why we are under
moral obligations in respect of that heritage. Nevertheless, I attempt
to defend those ideals. I seek to show that the protection of
humankind's heritage, qua humankind's, not only is a moral imperative:
more strongly put, it is a duty of justice. I then address one of the
most important objections to it - namely that it undermines states’ and
their citizenries’ legitimate interest in deciding what to do with
landmarks which are located on their territory.
/Cecile Fabre a political philosopher, and currently Senior Research
Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford. She is also Professor of Political
Philosophy at the University of Oxford, and affiliated with the Faculty
of Philosophy, the Department of Politics and International Relations,
and Nuffield College, Oxford. Her research interests are in theories of
distributive justice; the philosophy of democracy; just war theory; the
ethics of foreign policy, with particular focus on the ethics of
economic statecraft and the ethics of espionage.
She most recently published Spying Through a Glass Darkly: The Ethics of
Espionage and Counter-Intelligence (Oxford University Press 2022);
Economic Statecraft: Human Rights, Sanctions, and Conditionality
(Harvard University Press, 2018), preceded by (among others)
Cosmopolitan Peace (Oxford University Press, 2016), The Morality of
Defensive War, co-edited with Seth Lazar (Oxford University Press,
2014), Cosmopolitan War (Oxford University Press, 2012)./
https://kalender.univie.ac.at/einzelansicht/?no_cache=1&tx_univieevents_pi1…
/
/
______________
The Center for Religious Studies cordially invites you to a
Public Lecture by
*Dr.****Carlos Steel*
*“Malum metaphysicum. The Neoplatonic Antecedents”*
Vienna Campus
Quellenstrasse 51
Room : B-319 Senate Room
*Thursday, November 16, 2023, 5:30 pm – 7:00 pm***
* *
This lecture examines whether the Neoplatonic explanation of evil can be
seen as an antecedent of the Leibnizian metaphysics of evil, as is often
claimed. The starting-point is Augustine’s distinction between “malum
culpae” and “malum poenae”, to which Leibniz is indebted. The concept of
metaphysical evil is needed to encompass instances of evil that do not
fall under that distinction.
*
*
*Carlos Steel* is emeritus Professor for ancient and medieval philosophy
at the University of Leuven. His main research is devoted to the study
of the Platonic tradition from Plato to Ficino, with a particular
emphasis on the philosophy of Proclus. He is also known for his critical
editions and translations of ancient and medieval philosophical texts.
External guests need to register for events by filling up this form
<https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=E1nE2VN24kuSC72wOGOBhHA…> before
November 15th.
Greta
/Events Coordinator/
/Center for Religious Studies/
1459947696413_CEU_logo_color_web.jpg
Quellenstrasse 51 | 1100 Wien | B217a
_religion.ceu.edu <http://religion.ceu.edu/>_ / Rauleacg(a)ceu.edu
<mailto:Rauleacg@ceu.edu>
Dear Colleagues,
It is our pleasure to invite you to the Anti-Racism Week
<https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/news-events/>, a series of
events that will take place from 21-28 November 2023, organized by the
Anti-Racism Working Group <https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/>*
at the Department of Philosophy and the Vienna Doctoral School of
Philosophy.
*21.11, 9:00-13:00, CTL Peer Seminar Room, 7th floor *
“How to Deal with Diversity in Teaching and Other Professional
Situations” <https://zara.or.at/de/training/detail/JqjWzcVSS>
Workshop with Zivilcourage & Anti-Rassissmus Arbeit (ZARA
<https://www.zara.or.at/de>)
This training examines the topics of identity, diversity, attributions
of self and others, and discrimination on an individual level.
Differences and prejudices will be reflected upon, and strategies for
dealing with diversity will be developed - without pointing fingers!
All Faculty and Staff are welcome to attend! Register at:
antiracism.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at
*22.11, 15:00-18:15, HS 3D *
Wrong Passport Stories
<https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/news-events/detailsansicht/news/…>
Academic and Artistic Workshop
This artistic/academic workshop explores narratives of historical
injustices and global inequalities that limit the opportunities and
experiences of migrant researchers, particularly within European academia.
*23.11, 13:00-15:00, HS 3A *
“Decolonizing” the Library
<https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/news-events/detailsansicht/news/…>
Lunchtime Presentation & Discussion (Bring your own lunch!)
with Birgit Athumani Hango of the Working Group, “Colonial Contexts in
the University of Vienna Library”
*23.11, 17:00-19:00, HS 2G *
Migration and Research
<https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/news-events/detailsansicht/news/…>
Pragmatic Academic Series
This session will explore the challenges faced by immigrant researchers
and the need for policies to address them. Topics include integration
challenges, institutional support, barriers, and international
collaboration.
*28.11, 16:45, HS 3C *
Edelweiss: A Critical Love Letter to Austria (DE/EN)
<https://www.edelweissfilm.com/>
Film screening
EDELWEISS is a documentary about the harrowing realities of People of
Color living in Austria. It depicts the perspectives of many People of
Color with varying connections to Austria— some who call it home, some
who have made it their home, and others who would never call it home.
More information about the events can be found at
https://antiracism-philosophy.univie.ac.at/
* We define anti-racist action as raising awareness and dismantling
normalized racist structures, policies, and attitudes. Our goal at the
Department of Philosophy is to proactively address various forms of
racism, colonialism, xenophobia, and exclusion in our collective
contexts and to promote cultural change.
We look forward to enthusiastic engagement and fruitful discussions,
Your colleagues from the
The Anti-Racism Working Group
Dear all,
I am happy to invite you all to the next APSE (Applied Philosophy of
Science and Epistemology) talk!
When: Thursday, 15th of November 2023, 15:00 - 17:00
Where: HS 3A, NIG
We are excited to welcome as our next speaker Dr. Paul Giladi, Lecturer
in Philosophy at the School of History, Religions, and Philosophies,
SOAS University of London.
He will give a talk titled "Putnam on ‘The Last Dogma of Empiricism’:
From Auto da Fé to Epistemic Disobedience?"
Here is the abstract:
In this chapter, I argue that the principal philosophic depth of Hilary
Putnam’s dissolution of the fact/value dichotomy (FVD) is neither
sourced in his argument that theory selection always presupposes values,
nor in his argument that there is entanglement of fact and value in our
use of thick ethical concepts. Rather, the principal philosophic depth
mainly resides in Putnam’s charge that mainstream analytic philosophical
circles often fetishize (scientific) naturalism. Putnam’s
anti-scientism, more so than either of his entanglement theses, provides
his readers with reason to regard FVD as a type of ideology. Because of
its status as an ideology, and as therefore in the business of hegemonic
sense-making, FVD is made sense of as a real threat to inquiry, insofar
as FVD renders inquiry undemocratic by valorizing simplicity over
complexity, cleanliness over messiness, dry deserts over lush
landscapes. Putnam’s own ‘post-analytic’ pragmatist position never
ostensibly espoused any
critical theoretic attitude toward modernity – let alone formulated
Ideologiekritik. Nevertheless, I think his 21st-century articulations of
his conceptual pluralism may be said to display more resonance with the
decolonial concept of epistemic disobedience than with a ‘post-analytic’
tradition Putnam himself explicitly endorsed in
his final decade: liberal naturalism. I conclude that even though
Putnam’s anti-scientistic defence of mathematically recalcitrant
phenomena may be more radical than liberal naturalist defences of such
phenomena, Putnam should be viewed as ultimately more epistemically
mischievous than epistemically disobedient.
Looking forward to seeing you all at the talk!
Best,
Flora Löffelmann on behalf of the APSE team
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
NOVEMBER 16, 2023
START: 18:00
AUSTRIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
THEATERSAAL
SONNENFELSGASSE 19
1010 VIENNA
DEMETRA SFENDONI-MENTZOU
Interdisciplinary Centre of Aristotle Studies, Aristotle University
Thessaloniki
WELCOME
Ulrike Diebold | Vice-President of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
Claudia Isep | Deputy Secretary General of the Austrian Commission for
UNESCO
Introduction and Moderation of Q&A:
Herta Nagl-Docekal | Austrian Academy of Sciences and University of
Vienna
Aristotle’s philosophy of nature has been underestimated for centuries. His
Physics was considered by the protagonists of the “Scientific Revolution” as
a sterile system; the idea that there is no place for an Aristotelian
perspective
in science was, subsequently, reinforced by the development of Newtonian
mechanics. Against this traditional view, the lecture seeks to show that
Aristotle’s conception of nature is one of his most fruitful ideas, and
that the
insights gained from Aristotle’s work are becoming increasingly relevant to
contemporary science. Furthermore, the lecture argues that, in the light
of the
impressive discoveries in numerous fields of science, especially in
physics, a
closer look at Aristotle’s work will reveal that the Stageirite has
elaborated a
dynamic model of nature, which is much closer than Newtonian physics to the
new scientific image of nature emerging today. At the same time, Aristotle’s
insights into the inter-relation of all disciplines and the unity of
knowledge can
respond to the growing need for a re-unification of the various sciences
through
an interdisciplinary approach.
Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou is Professor Em. of Philosophy of Science, the
founding and current President of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Aristotle
Studies, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece, and Fellow of the
Charles
S. Peirce Society. She served as President of the Greek Philosophical
Society
(2006–08) and the Charles Sanders Peirce Society (2014–15). Her research
focus
on the importance of Aristotle’s thought for the current sciences is
documented
in her studies on Quantum Mechanics, Microphysics and the Bio-Sciences.
She edited Aristotle and Contemporary Science (two volumes, 2000/2001) and
Aristotle–Contemporary Perspectives on his Thought (2018). Furthermore, she
demonstrated how the philosophy of American Pragmatism relates to
Aristotle’s
thinking. As President of the C. S. Peirce Society she chaired the
“Charles S.
Peirce International Centennial Congress,” Lowell, Massachusetts (2014).
Most
importantly, she initiated, organized and chaired the “World Congress
Aristotle
2400 Years” Thessaloniki 2016, under the auspices of the President of
the Hellenic
Republic, and edited the Proceedings of that Congress (2019). Currently,
Prof.
Sfendoni-Mentzou is establishing a joint Greek-Chinese research program that
was initiated at the international “Aristotle-Confucius Symposium on
Ethics for
the 21st Century” that she co-organized in July 2023.
The Leibniz Lectures, as part of the Academy Lectures of the Austrian
Academy
of Sciences, refer to the fact that Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz presented
the first plans
for a „Society of Sciences in Vienna“ to the Emperor during his time in
Vienna
in 1712–1714. Lectures are given by scholars who have gained international
recognition not only in their own field, and whose research demonstrates the
differentiation potential of philosophy both for interdisciplinary
understanding,
and for dealing with publicly relevant issues of the present.
Please register at: www.oeaw.ac.at/anmeldung/akademievorlesungen
CONTACT: Andrea Windegger, Austrian Academy of Scienes,
andrea.windegger(a)oeaw.ac.at
Hallo, liebe Mitarbeitende und Studierende des Instituts für Philosophie,
Die Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen richtet zusammen
mit der Intergenerational Foundation (IF) einen Aufsatzwettbewerb zum
Thema „Langfristige Friedenssicherung für zukünftige Generationen“ aus.
Der Preis ist mit einem Preisgeld von 10.000€ dotiert. Die
Gewinner:innen werden nicht nur finanziell honoriert, sondern erhalten
auch die Möglichkeit, ihre Einreichungen in der Zeitschrift
Intergenerational Justice Review zu veröffentlichen.
Weitere Informationen und die Teilnahmefrist befinden sich auf dem
Ausschreibungsposter, oder auf der Website der Stiftung für die Rechte
zukünftiger Generationen unter
https://generationengerechtigkeit.info/generationengerechtigkeits-preis/.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Das Team der Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen
--
Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen | Foundation for the
Rights of Future Generations
Mannspergerstr. 29
70619 Stuttgart
Tel. +49 711 28052777 | kontakt(a)srzg.de
generationengerechtigkeit.info
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unterstützen Sie uns: https://generationengerechtigkeit.info/unterstuetzen/
Folgen Sie uns auf Instagram/twitter (@gengerecht)
Dear colleagues,
since end of September, the documentation of the first “Day of
Parliamentary Research” (2023) is available online (currently only in
German) under: Tag der Parlamentsforschung 2023: Tagungsbericht |
Parlament Österreich
<https://www.parlament.gv.at/fachinfos/rlw/Tag-der-Parlamentsforschung-2023-…>.
It includes the presentation slides of keynote speaker Marc Geddes (see:
Tag-der-Parlamentsforschung-2023-Keynote-Marc-Geddes.pdf
<https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/fachinfos/parlamentsforschung/Tag-der-…>)
as well as almost all the other presentations and posters.
On this occasion, we are delighted to make the following announcements:
-The next “*Day of Parliamentary Research*” will take place on *20 June
2024*. The according call for contributions will probably be published
in January 2024.
-The call for applications for the annual “*Research Year in
Parliament*” is expected to be published in December 2023. The programme
*supports a one-year research project* with expertise and resources from
the Austrian Parliamentary Administration. Applications will be accepted
*in English and German*.
-Currently, *not* all contents about our initiatives concerning
parliamentary research are *available in English yet*. However, please
stay in touch and follow the constant development of the according
section on our website: Parlamentsforschung | Parlament Österreich
<https://www.parlament.gv.at/fachinfos/rlw/parlamentsforschung/>.
If you have any questions, please contact us via
parlamentsforschung(a)parlament.gv.at
<mailto:parlamentsforschung@parlament.gv.at>. We kindly ask you to
spread the information among interested colleagues and hope to see you
again next year in the Austrian Parliament.
Kind regards on behalf of the whole team,
Christoph Clar
*Research and Support in Parliamentary Matters
*Parliamentary Administration
Legal, Legislative and Research Services (RLW)
cid:image003.png@01D96C6C.E88AAB50
1017 Vienna, Austria
Tel. +43 1 401 10-2668
Mobil +43 676 8900 2668
For further information see:
https://www.parlament.gv.at/fachinfos/rlw/parlamentsforschung/
<https://www.parlament.gv.at/fachinfos/rlw/parlamentsforschung/>
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Colloquium einladen.
Termin: 09.11.2023, 18:30 - 20:00, HS 3F, Neues Institutsgebäude
Thema: Performative Philosophie mit einem Input von Nick Nagel über Rainer Totzke ("Alternative Formen des Philosophierens")
Ein kurzer Text von Totzke dient uns als Ausgangspunkt für die weitere Diskussion. Auf Anfrage wird der Text gerne zugesendet.
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert.
Wir freuen uns auf euch!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
*Workshop: "What difference does 'being' make? **The role of the verb
εἰμί in the clause and its manifestation in **philosophical discourse"*
Historians of ancient Greek philosophy often lack the necessary
knowledge to understand the strange expressions of the philosophers they
study. Moreover, ancient Greek philosophers sometimes use such
expressions as technical terms, as is the case with those that contain
the verb εἰμί 'am' (≈ to be).
Following philosophers like Frege and Russell, historians of ancient
philosophy usually approach the semantics of "being" from a logical
point of view, showing more interest in the logical operations behind
εἰμί-sentences than in the function of the verb εἰμί within the clause.
If one surveys the philosophical literature, one will find countless
mentions of the 'is' of "existence", the 'is' of "predication", or the
'is' of "identity", but hardly any mention of the difference between
lexical verbs and auxiliary verbs―and copulas are auxiliaries for
predication.
To compensate for these deficiencies, we have set out to bring together
nine distinguished experts in Ancient Greek to hear what they have to
say about the verb εἰμί and its role in the clause. The idea is to learn
from them so that we do not overlook important linguistic matters when
we approach ancient Greek philosophy. For we must not forget that Greek
philosophers coined both logical and ontological terms in natural
language, that is, in Ancient Greek.
1.
Lecture: "The Name of the Verb: On the Persistence of the Aristotelian
View of the Copula in
Formal Syntax"
We are pleased to invite you to the in-person lecture "The Name of the
Verb: On the Persistence of the Aristotelian View of the Copula in
Formal Syntax", which will take place on December 5, 2023
(Marietta-Blau-Saal, University of Vienna, Main Building).
Professor Andrea Moro will speak about the validity of the Aristotelian
interpretation of the verb "to be" in formal syntax.
*The Name of the Verb*
Beginning with the early works of Aristotle, the interpretation of the
verb "to be" and its equivalents across languages runs through Western
linguistic thought intertwining with philosophy, metaphysics, logic, and
even mathematics―so much so that Bertrand Russell showed no hesitation
in proclaiming it to be "a disgrace to the human race". Professor Moro
will show that this verb is still a scandal and, like a Trojan horse of
linguistics, it introduces disruptive elements that lead us to a radical
rethinking of the most basic structure of human language, the sentence,
paradoxically reviving Aristotle's original view.