Dear Colleagues,
We are happy to invite you to the next session of the Work-In-Progress
series in a week, on Thursday 2nd May. There will be two presentations,
given by Mariia Fedorova and Zachary Daus. Detailed information is
below:
When & Where: Thursday, May 2, 17:15 - 18:45, Hörsaal 3A (NIG,
Universitätsstraße 7)
1st Presentation: Speaker: Mariia Fedorova.
Title: On Virtues and Vices of Imaginative Constraints
Abstract:
Several philosophers have recently argued that imagination can be
epistemically useful when it is properly constrained by reality.
Nevertheless, the nature of the so-called imaginative constraints has
remained a contentious matter. On the one hand, it is believed that
imagination is constrained by one’s beliefs about the world which are
readily accessible to introspection and available for voluntary control.
I refer to this view as the voluntary-imaginative-constraints view
(VIC). On the other hand, given the shared cognitive architecture of
perception and imagination, imaginative constraints are stipulated to
take the form of perceptual regularities, inaccessible to consciousness
and, by extension, out of voluntary control. Call this view the
architectural-imaginative-constraints view (AIC). Prima facie, VIC and
AIC are compatible. It seems plausible to suppose that imagination can
be constrained by one’s beliefs about the world as well as by perceptual
regularities. Under closer examination, however, the advocates of VIC
and AIC appear to talk about one and the same kind of imaginative
constraints - the imaginer’s background knowledge of her environment.
The key difference between VIC and AIC lies in the relationship they
take to obtain between the imaginer and her knowledge. This puts
pressure on the apparent compatibility of VIC and AIC and challenges us
to make a choice between treating the imaginer’s knowledge as (i)
consciously accessible and controlled or as (ii) inaccessible to
consciousness and out of voluntary control. If we favour (i),
imagination’s reliability is in jeopardy. If we favour (ii), its
epistemic value is compromised. Fortunately, a dual-system model of
imagination as proposed by Michael Stuart offers a way out of this
dilemma. Instead of distinguishing different types of imaginative
constraints, we can distinguish different ways of exercising
imagination, one of which is consciously accessible and controlled,
while the other is unconscious and automatic.
2nd Presentation: Speaker: Zachary Daus.
Title: Distribution, Recognition and the Politics
of Justice in Medical AI.
Abstract:
Advocates of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine suggest that one
of its greatest benefits is its ability to resolve issues in the
distribution of scarce medical resources. While there is real potential
for medical AI to alleviate medical resource scarcity and consequently
contribute to a more just distribution of medical resources, this would
come at a cost to justice as recognition. A biased clinical decision
support system (CDSS), for example, may result in more distributively
just outcomes by expanding access to medical care, but at a cost to the
mis-recognition of minorities and women. Should such a CDSS be tolerated
for its improvement in distribution at its cost to recognition?
Similarly a black box CDSS, for example, may arrive at decisions that
are incapable of meaningful explanations despite expanding access to
medical care. Must such systems incur the cost of being engineered for
explainability in order to ensure that they do not mis-recognize humans
qua rational agents? In light of these and similar issues, I argue that
one of the predominant theories of justice that guides the distribution
of medical resources—Norman Daniels's Rawls-inspired accountability for
reasonableness (AFR)—must be either supplemented or replaced by a theory
of justice as recognition, and consider the theories of recognition
developed by Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth as potential candidates.
There are refreshments and snacks. And all are invited to join for
dinner or drinks afterward.
Please let us know (wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at) if you have any
questions or if you would like to present for the Work-in-Progress
series yourself. You can find calendar and event information
at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/.
Best wishes and we hope to see you there!
The organizing team
Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the upcoming talk of the APSE - lecture
series, delivered by Stephanie Ifill (University of Westminster)
Title: Knowledge as a turn towards the possibility of existence
When/Where: 12.10., 15-17pm, HS 3A
If you are interested in joining us for dinner/drinks afterwards, write
an email to Manu Sharma (manu.sharma(a)univie.ac.at)! everyone welcome!
Abstract:
"I came to realise that to produce knowledge, I must enter into a
framework where I am non-existent....I refused...There must be another
possibility, another way of knowing." This talk brings forward the
question: what is the possibility of epistemic non-existence? One of the
possibilities I raise is that of the turn. The turn is not a seek of
inclusion in; it's a turn, a break from. I turn in relation to Sylvia
Wynter (to rupture) and Henri Bergson (to indetermination) to help
articulate what I mean by epistemic turn. Upon awareness, there is the
possibility to turn from, indeed with a cost, but a possibility none the
less. This talk represents the culmination of deep thought brought out
through relational conversations and a direct lived confrontation with
epistemic non-existence; it's part of an ongoing experiment in the
possibility of appearing in Europe as a *Black woman (outside of the
cage).
Kind regards,
Sophie Veigl on behalf of the APSE-Unit
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Summer School
Call for Applications
(Deadline: April 1, 2024 extended: April 30, 2024)
22nd univie: summer school Scientific World Conceptions (USS-SWC)
EuropEAN SUMMER SCHOOL on the philosophy of mathematics
in cooperation with
EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS (ESPM)
<https://philmath.eu/> https://philmath.eu/
Vienna, September 9-13, 2024
The second European Summer School on the Philosophy of Mathematics will
focus on different topics in the philosophy of mathematics, its foundations,
as well as on the philosophy of mathematical practice. We are happy to
invite abstract submissions by graduate students (MA and PhD). The School
will be hosted in person at the University of Vienna and will include three
tutorials by distinguished scholars as well as a training unit on
"Quantitative and qualitative empirical methods for philosophers of
mathematics" by Matthew Inglis and Deborah Kant (provided by the CIPSH Chair
DMRCP ("Diversity of Mathematical Research Cultures and Practices").
The school aims to bring together Master and PhD students interested in the
connection between philosophy and mathematics, giving them the opportunity
to discuss related topics with leading scholars in the field.
Topics will be selected reflecting participants interests and may include:
* Mathematical knowledge and mathematical understanding
* Justification and representation in mathematics
* Informal proofs and mathematical rigor
* The role of intuition and diagrams in mathematical reasoning
* Experimental mathematics and mathematical practice
* Mathematical ontology
Lecturers:
Jessica Carter (Aarhus University)
<https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177
bcfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html>
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177b
cfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html
Yacin Hamami (ETH Zurich)
<https://www.yacinhamami.com> https://www.yacinhamami.com
Leon Horsten (University of Konstanz)
<https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/>
https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/
The program is primarily directed at graduate students and junior
researchers in relevant fields, but the organizers also encourage
applications from people in all stages of their career.
Application form and further information:
<https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/>
https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/
USS-SWC operates under the academic supervision of an International Program
Committee of distinguished philosophers, historians, and scientists. Its
members represent the scientific fields in the scope of USS-SWC, make
contact to their home universities and will also support acknowledgement of
courses taken by the students. The annual summer school is organised by the
Institute Vienna Circle of the University of Vienna.
<https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/> https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/
Find information about our exchange programme with Duke University (North
Carolina) here:
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-
wide-partnership-agreements/north-america/>
https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-w
ide-partnership-agreements/north-america/
Inquiries:
Administrator:
Zarah Weiss
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:summerschool.ivc@univie.ac.at> summerschool.ivc(a)univie.ac.at
Scientific director:
Georg Schiemer
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:georg.schiemer@univie.ac.at> georg.schiemer(a)univie.ac.at
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Jesús Zamora Bonilla, who will give a
talk on April 25, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM TALK: JESÚS ZAMORA BONILLA
ON OBSERVATIONAL STATEMENTS AS EPISTEMIC PUBLIC GOODS: AN INFERENTIALIST
RECONSTRUCTION OF NEURATH'S PROTOKOLLSÄTZE
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 25/04/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
Philosophical discussions have tended to concentrate much more on how
observational statements are 'theory laden' than on what is what makes
them observational to begin with. After discrediting the notion of a
'purely observational language' or the existence of 'pure sense data',
consensus has apparently been that it is a concern for the practicing
scientists themselves to determine by acquaintance or familiarity what
counts in each case as an 'observation', without the possibility of
having something like a 'general philosophical theory of scientific
observation'. Without denying the role of contextual and tacit knowledge
in the process of determining what can be taken as an observational
statement, this talk tries to recover Otto Neurath's idea of
Protokolsätze by immersing it in an inferentialist account of scientific
activity (or 'science as a game of persuasion') and by employing some
concepts derived from economics and game theory, in particular Milgrom's
notion of 'public events' as a possible solution of the problem of
common knowledge in games of coordination. Further consequences are
derived in regard of the relation between private and public knowledge,
and about the revisability of observational information.
Dear all,
this is just a reminder that tomorrow is UVienna's Work-In-Progress Series with Jesús Zamora Bonilla (Visiting Scholar from UNED).
When? Thursday, April 18, 17:00 - 18:30
Where? Hörsaal 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße 7)
Title: "Reflections on the ontology of social problems"
Abstract:
The aim of this talk is to explore the entangledness of social problems with both the positive and normative aspects of social reality and social ideas, and connect it with a variety of debates within the social ontology literature. Despite the broad scope of this field, 'social problems' are conspicuously missing as an independent category. This omission is intriguing since many of the listed topics (like Group Agency, Organizations, Money, Race, Gender, and Disability, etc.) are inherently linked to various kinds of social problems. This dearth of attention to social problems is also reflected in academic databases like The Philosopher's Index, which yield zero results when searching for "ontology" and "social problem" together. The neglect of social problems within the academic field of social ontology is not due to a lack of significance attached to them by social scientists themselves: disciplines like economics and sociology recognize the centrality of social problems and have dedicated a lot of work to their study. Some arguments in favour of the centrality of social problems are the following: first, in many philosophical theories, from pragmatism to existentialism, ‘reality’ is not merely a question of, say, ‘brute existence’, but something that emerges in front of humans as a kind of resistance (or, as Heidegger would have put it, as a kind of Unzuhandenheit). In this sense, problems would probably be the ‘most real’ things for humans (and perhaps for living beings in general), and social problems would count amongst the ‘hardest’ social facts we can encounter as inhabitants of the social world. Second, something similar happens at the level of the social sciences, whose main direct motivation is very likely the attempt of understanding the social world in order to help to solve some of the problems that afflict the members of the societies to which social scientists themselves belong. These arguments point to the conclusion that the most reasonable approaches to the ontology of social problems will have to pay considerable attention to items and ideas coming from phenomenology.
Everyone is most cordially invited to join us for dinner or drinks afterward. If possible, please let us know in advance by email.
You can write to wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:wip.philosophie@univie.ac.at> if you have any questions or would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series. Calendar and event information can be found at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team
(Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian Fleisch, Mark Basafa, Sophie Veigl, Raphael Aybar, Nianzu Tu)
Dear all,
The Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy invites you to the next
Pragmatic Academic event on
"Academic Publishing in Philosophy Journals", which will take place on
Friday, April 19th, from 14:00 to 16:00 in room 2G, NiG.
This time, Prof. Benjamin Schnieder, Prof. Paulina Sliwa and Dr. Sophie
Veigl will share their insider experiences and answer questions such as
Should I publish research articles as a PhD student?
Where should I publish?
What happens when I submit a manuscript to a journal?
Participants can send their questions in advance to
vd.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at.
The full event description is available at
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/events/details/news/academic-publishing-…
We look forward to seeing you there. Please feel free to share this
invitation with others who may be interested.
Raphael Aybar
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
wir laden Sie herzlich zum Gastvortrag von Prof. Jörg Robert (Tübingen)
anlässlich des 300. Geburtstages von Immanuel Kant ein:
„FREIHEIT DER KUNST? – KANT UND DIE ERFINDUNG DER ÄSTHETISCHEN AUTONOMIE“
18. April, 19:00 – 20:30
Marietta-Blau-Saal, Universität Wien
Weitere Infos unter:
https://neugermanistik-wien.at/event/freiheit-der-kunst-kant-und-die-erfind…
Eine Anmeldung ist nicht erforderlich.
Wir freuen uns auf Ihr Kommen!
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Lydia Rammerstorfer
--
Univ.- Ass. Mag. Lydia Rammerstorfer
Institut für Germanistik
Universität Wien
Universitätsring 1
1010 Wien
Zimmer: ZG 102.33
Tel.: +43-1-4277-42285
lydia.rammerstorfer(a)univie.ac.at
rammersl(a)hu-berlin.de
Dear friends of the ISTB,
we cordially invite you to a public lecture in two parts, organized by
ISTB + IKGA:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Diwakar Acharya (University of Oxford): "Hidden in Plain Sight:
Identification and Analysis of Some Early Sāṃkhya and Yoga Texts"
*
Part I: Monday, April 22, 2024, 17:30, in seminar room 1 of the ISTB
(University Campus, Spitalgasse 2, Hof 2.7, 1090 Vienna) (iCal
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_istb/NE_Vortraege/ICS/2024…>)
Part II: Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 17:00, Room 5, Austrian Academy of
Sciences, 4th floor, Georg-Coch-Platz 2, 1010 Vienna
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information on the talk and the speaker can be found in this PDF
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_istb/NE_Vortraege/PDF/2024…>
or on our website
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/hidden-in-plain-sight-iden…>.
After the lecture, we invite you to a small reception.
We are looking forward to seeing you there,
best regards, Judith Starecek
--
Institut für Südasien-, Tibet- und Buddhismuskunde
Universität Wien
Spitalgasse 2, Hof 2.1
1090 Wien
-----------
T: +43-1-4277-43502
stb.univie.ac.at
Save the dates of our other oncoming lectures, too
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/en/news-events/detail/news/istb-event-programme/>!
April 25, 2024, 17:30
Public lecture:
Nathan Hill, “The 23rd letter of the Tibetan alphabet: the controversy
continues”
May 22-23, 2024
Seminar & public lecture:
Naomi Appleton, on the /Viśvantarajātaka/
June 6, 2024, 17:30
Public lecture:
Peter Szánto, “Re-editing the /Suhṛllekha/, attributed to Nāgārjuna”
June 13-15, 2024
Workshop:
“Sounds, Literature and Images: Indian Experience in the First World War“
July 5-6, 2024
Workshop:
"Monasticism and Religious Identities in Tibet: Yogic Cultures and Study
Curricula in 15th Century Tibet"
July 8-13,2024
Sanskrit Summer Academy:
"Philosophical Perspectives on Language in premodern South Asia"
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/philosophical-perspectives…>
Registration is open until May 31st!
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/philosophical-perspectives…>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't want to receive our emails any longer? - Unsubscribe from this
list <https://stb.univie.ac.at/en/news-events/newsletter-unsubscribe/>
Dear all,
I am happy to invite you all to the next APSE (Applied Philosophy of
Science and Epistemology) talk!
When: Thursday, 11.4.2024, 15:00 - 17:00
Where: ONLINE -> Zoom Link:
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/66424108457?pwd=d1VwcVR1M1BBVXVpbHM3ejFKNDNOZz09
We are excited to welcome as our next speaker Dr. Paul Giladi, Lecturer
in Philosophy at the School of History, Religions, and Philosophies,
SOAS University of London.
He will give a talk titled "Putnam on ‘The Last Dogma of Empiricism’:
From Auto da Fé to Epistemic Disobedience?"
Here is the abstract:
In this chapter, I argue that the principal philosophic depth of Hilary
Putnam’s dissolution of the fact/value dichotomy (FVD) is neither
sourced in his argument that theory selection always presupposes values,
nor in his argument that there is entanglement of fact and value in our
use of thick ethical concepts. Rather, the principal philosophic depth
mainly resides in Putnam’s charge that mainstream analytic philosophical
circles often fetishize (scientific) naturalism. Putnam’s
anti-scientism, more so than either of his entanglement theses, provides
his readers with reason to regard FVD as a type of ideology. Because of
its status as an ideology, and as therefore in the business of hegemonic
sense-making, FVD is made sense of as a real threat to inquiry, insofar
as FVD renders inquiry undemocratic by valorizing simplicity over
complexity, cleanliness over messiness, dry deserts over lush
landscapes. Putnam’s own ‘post-analytic’ pragmatist position never
ostensibly espoused any
critical theoretic attitude toward modernity – let alone formulated
Ideologiekritik. Nevertheless, I think his 21st-century articulations of
his conceptual pluralism may be said to display more resonance with the
decolonial concept of epistemic disobedience than with a ‘post-analytic’
tradition Putnam himself explicitly endorsed in
his final decade: liberal naturalism. I conclude that even though
Putnam’s anti-scientistic defence of mathematically recalcitrant
phenomena may be more radical than liberal naturalist defences of such
phenomena, Putnam should be viewed as ultimately more epistemically
mischievous than epistemically disobedient.
Looking forward to seeing you all at the talk!
Best,
Flora Löffelmann on behalf of the APSE team
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
Am Sonntag, den 14. April wird um 11 Uhr im Museum für angewandte Kunst
in Wien der Günther-Anders-Preis für kritisches Denken an den
Schriftsteller und Philosophen Guillaume Paoli verliehen.
Die Veranstaltung ist öffentlich und Sie sind herzlich willkommen! Wenn
Sie kommen möchten, bitten wir Sie um eine Anmeldung per E-Mail an
gap(a)chbeck-kulturstiftung.de
Das Programm:
Begrüßung von Christian Dries, Obmann der
Anders-Gesellschaft/Vorsitzender der Preis-Jury
Laudatio von Karin Harrasser, Direktorin (interimistisch) des ifk, Wien
Überreichung der Preisurkunde von Wolfgang Beck
Dankesrede von Guillaume Paoli
Lesung von Michael Maertens aus Texten von Günther Anders
Anschließend Gespräch zwischen dem Preisträger, Karin Harrasser und
Stephan Lessenich
Kleiner Empfang
Zum Preisträger:
GUILLAUME PAOLI wird für seine Sammlung funkelnder Notate „Geist und
Müll. Von Denkweisen in postnormalen Zeiten" mit dem Günther
Anders-Preis für kritisches Denken ausgezeichnet. Unter „Geist" versteht
der in Frankreich geborene und in Berlin lebende Schriftsteller und
Philosoph eine „Transformationskraft", die mit vollem Einsatz für eine
„Politik emanzipatorischer Konservierung" wirbt, um die Welt in
bewohnbarem Zustand zu erhalten. Die vom Autor geforderte „Wissenschaft
vom Management und der Beseitigung von Müll" schließt eine
Müllsortierung des Geistes mit ein, denn „Müll entsteht im Kopf". Paolis
kritisches Denken gipfelt in der Antinomie, dass heute „eine Revolution
sowohl unmöglich als auch unabdingbar ist". Es ist dieses Paradoxon, das
Paolis ebenso scharfsinnige wie flanierende Geistesgegenwart antreibt.
Der Apokalypse-Blindheit einer Zivilisation am Abgrund hält Paoli im
Geiste von Günther Anders ein Denken von schonungsloser Widerständigkeit
und bestechender Klarheit entgegen, ohne dabei auf Eleganz zu
verzichten.
Herzliche Grüße,
Sara Walker
Sekretariat
Internationale Günther Anders-Gesellschaft
https://www.guenther-anders-gesellschaft.org/
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Kolloquium einladen.
Termin: 11.04.2024, 18:30 - 20:00, Hörsaal 3D, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG)
Thema: Aus der Nacht in die Nacht – Zum literarischen Moment des philosophischen Schreibens (Maurice Blanchot) und einem Input von Ana Drujan:
Genauso, wie Blanchot über die Literatur schreibt, dass sie als Negation ihrer Selbst nichtig, illegitim und eine Täuschung ist, könnte man dies auch über die Philosophie behaupten. Die Forderung nach einem philosophischen Schreiben der Diskontinuität und des Fragmentarischen, die er dabei verhandelt, kann damit auch gelesen werden als eine Forderung nach einer Philosophie, die in ihrer Form der Literatur oder gar der Lyrik ähnelt: Eine Philosophie, die den Tod in ihrem Rücken sieht und aus der Leere des Grabes die Wirklichkeit seiner Sprache schöpft. Eine Philosophie der Mehrdeutigkeit, die als unbestimmte Negation aus dem Negieren heraus eine unscharfe Vielheit erschafft, die das Unerklärliche vergegenwärtigen kann. Könnte eine Philosophie, die in ihrem Schreiben ein Moment des Literarischen enthält, ein unvergängliches Werk sein, wie Blanchot in Anlehnung an Hegel schreibt?
https://kammerlphilosophieblog.wordpress.com/2024/03/12/uberlegungen-zum-fr…
Einen Text zum Thema senden wir gerne auf Anfrage aus.
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert, wo wir den Abend gemeinsam ausklingen lassen.
Wir freuen uns auf euch!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
im Anhang schicke ich Ihnen den Aushang für die kommende FÖP der DSPL43
( Philosophie) am Mittwoch, 10.04.2024 ab 14.30. Bitte beachten Sie,
dass die FÖP dieses Semester vor Ort im Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG)
stattfindet.
--
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached the schedule for our next faculty-public
presentation (FÖP) of doctoral research projects on Wednesday, 10 April
2024 from 2.30 p.m. onwards. Please note that this semester the FÖP will
be held on site in Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG).
Mit besten Grüßen,
With best wishes,
Benjamin Schnieder, DSPL43
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
mit der Bitte um Aushang und Weiterleitung darf ich Ihnen anbei den Call
for Abstracts für den 11. Kongress der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für
Philosophie zum Thema "Zukunft denken" (25. bis 28. Februar 2025,
Universität Graz) zusenden.
Herzliche Grüße,
Laurin Mackowitz
--
Laurin Mackowitz, Dr.Mag.Bakk.phil.
Universitätsassistent
Institut für Philosophie
Arbeitsbereich Politische Philosophie
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Heinrichstraße 26/II, 8010 Graz, Austria
https://philosophie-gewi.uni-graz.at/de/politische-philosophie/neuigkeiten/
Generalsekretär der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie
http://oegp.org/
Dear all
Please join us for the Christian Piller talk on 7th May:
Why interpersonal comparisons of utility and well-being might be problematic: a philosophical analysis<https://events.ceu.edu/2024-05-07/why-interpersonal-comparisons-utility-and…>
Christian Piller (University of York and IAS, CEU Budapest)
Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - 3:40PM
Vienna Campus | Quellenstrasse 51 | QS D-001 Tiered
For more information, please click on the event title.
We look forward to welcoming you to CEU.
Kind regards
Central European University
Department of Philosophy
Quellenstrasse 51 | A-1100 Wien | Austria
Office: Room D427
Working hours: Monday 09:00 – 17:00; Tuesday 09:30 – 17:30; Wednesday and Thursday 09:00 – 16:00
This message is intended for the individual named above and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender. Central European University (CEU) is an undergraduate- and graduate-level private university accredited in the United States, Austria, and Hungary. CEU’s educational activities in Austria are performed at Central European University Private University by CEU GmbH, a private limited-liability company having its seat in Vienna, under the address Quellenstrasse 51, A-1100 Wien, and is registered at the Vienna Commercial Court under registration number FN 502313 x. CEU’s educational activities in Hungary are performed by Közép-európai Egyetem, at Nádor utca 9., 1051 Budapest, under registration number FI 27861. CEU is accredited in the US, with a registered address at 224 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Dear Colleagues in the Philosophy Department,
*Guest Lecture, Lona Gaikis, 'Art as a Life Form: Thinking with Susanne
K. Langer: 18:00, 11 April, Musicology Dept., HS 1*
I'm delighted to invite you to a guest lecture by Lona Gaikis, who will
be introducing us the thought of German-American philosopher Susanne
Langer. Langer's philosophy of music has long been neglected by the
musicological establishment, but fortunately that is changing, as
evidenced by the recently published /Bloomsbury Handbook of Susanne K.
Langer/ (2024), edited by Ms Gaikis.
As well as lecturing at various universities in Austria, Ms Gaikis also
runs the sonic and music experimental platform czirp czirp, which hosts
works by various international sonic media artists. In her talk she will
also be discussing how Langer's thought can help us to understand some
of this avant garde work.
More information can be found on the Musicology Dept. website, here
<https://musikwissenschaft.univie.ac.at/detailansicht/news/gastvortrag-lona-…>.
With warmest regards,
Marc Brooks
--
*Ass.-Prof. Dr. Marc Brooks
*Department of Musicology, University of Vienna
Spitalgasse 2, Hof 9 (Campus)
A-1090 Wien, AUSTRIA
e: marc.brooks(a)univie.ac.at
w: https://musikwissenschaft.univie.ac.at/ueber-uns/team/brooks/
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: NATURE AS RESOURCE, AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE, AND
SOURCE OF DANGER
APRIL 18–20, 2024
AUSTRIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
THEATERSAAL
SONNENFELSGASSE 19
1010 VIENNA
The International Office has published the following calls for
research-related mobility grant applications:
*Mobility Fellowships*for 3 to 8-week research stays at the Strategic
Partners (PhD, Post-Doc, Ass. Prof., Assoc. Prof., Univ. Prof.). Funding
for travel expenses and accommodation.
Further information.
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/faculty-staff-mobility/researchers/ou…>
Application deadline: 23 April 2024.
*Stanford Post-Doc Fellowship*for 3 to 8-week research stays at Stanford
University (Post-Doc). Funding for travel expenses and accommodation.
Further information.
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/faculty-staff-mobility/researchers/ou…>
Application deadline: 23 April 2024.
*Erasmus+ Short-Term PhD Mobility*for 5 to 14-day research stays at
universities and research institutions in Europe (PhD students without
an employment relationship at UNIVIE). Funding by means of a per diem.
Further information.
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/faculty-staff-mobility/researchers/ou…>
Submission deadline: 16 April 2024.
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: [Khoraplattform] Cinesophie 20.03.
Datum: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:40:26 +0100
Von: Julian via Khoraplattform <khoraplattform(a)lists.philo.at>
Antwort an: Julian <j.hoeckner(a)inext.at>
An: Adrian Fleisch via Khoraplattform <khoraplattform(a)lists.philo.at>
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
morgen (Donnerstag, 21.03.) wird es wieder 'cinesophisch'!
Nachdem wir uns letzte Woche anlässlich seines 100. Todesjahres schon
mit Franz Kafka befasst haben, widmen wir uns dieses Mal seiner
Rezeption im Film.
Zu Kafkas Lebzeiten steckte das Kino als ästhetisches Medium noch in den
Kinderschuhen. Umso spannender is es zu beobachten, wie seine
literarischen Experimente Eingang in die Geschichte des Films gefunden
haben. 'Kafkaesk' sind nicht nur die ikonischen Verfilmungen von Orson
Welles ("Der Prozess"), Michael Haneke ("Das Schloss") oder die strengen
Adaptionen von Straub/Huillet (u.a. "Klassenverhältnisse", "Schakale und
Araber"). Von den schwindelerregenden Bürokratieungetümern bei Terry
Gilliam ("Brazil") bis zu den gruseligen Metamorphosen bei D. Lynch
("Eraserhead) oder D. Cronenberg ("The Fly", "Videodrome") zieht sich
eine Spur des Kafkaesken durch das filmische Imaginäre des 20.
Jahrhunderts.
In gewohnter Manier stellen wir eine kleine Liste zur Auswahl und
entscheiden uns gemeinsam für einen Film:
Orson Welles - Der Prozess (1962)
David Lynch - Eraserhead (1977)
Jim Jarmusch - Dead Man (1995)
Darren Aronofsky - Pi (1998)
Wir freuen uns auf Euch!
Beste Grüße
Julian Höckner
Summer School
Call for Applications
(Deadline: April 1, 2024 extended: April 30, 2024)
22nd univie: summer school Scientific World Conceptions (USS-SWC)
EuropEAN SUMMER SCHOOL on the philosophy of mathematics
in cooperation with
EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS (ESPM)
<https://philmath.eu/> https://philmath.eu/
Vienna, September 9-13, 2024
The second European Summer School on the Philosophy of Mathematics will
focus on different topics in the philosophy of mathematics, its foundations,
as well as on the philosophy of mathematical practice. We are happy to
invite abstract submissions by graduate students (MA and PhD). The School
will be hosted in person at the University of Vienna and will include three
tutorials by distinguished scholars as well as a training unit on
"Quantitative and qualitative empirical methods for philosophers of
mathematics" by Matthew Inglis and Deborah Kant (provided by the CIPSH Chair
DMRCP ("Diversity of Mathematical Research Cultures and Practices").
The school aims to bring together Master and PhD students interested in the
connection between philosophy and mathematics, giving them the opportunity
to discuss related topics with leading scholars in the field.
Topics will be selected reflecting participants interests and may include:
* Mathematical knowledge and mathematical understanding
* Justification and representation in mathematics
* Informal proofs and mathematical rigor
* The role of intuition and diagrams in mathematical reasoning
* Experimental mathematics and mathematical practice
* Mathematical ontology
Lecturers:
Jessica Carter (Aarhus University)
<https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177
bcfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html>
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177b
cfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html
Yacin Hamami (ETH Zurich)
<https://www.yacinhamami.com> https://www.yacinhamami.com
Leon Horsten (University of Konstanz)
<https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/>
https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/
The program is primarily directed at graduate students and junior
researchers in relevant fields, but the organizers also encourage
applications from people in all stages of their career.
Application form and further information:
<https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/>
https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/
USS-SWC operates under the academic supervision of an International Program
Committee of distinguished philosophers, historians, and scientists. Its
members represent the scientific fields in the scope of USS-SWC, make
contact to their home universities and will also support acknowledgement of
courses taken by the students. The annual summer school is organised by the
Institute Vienna Circle of the University of Vienna.
<https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/> https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/
Find information about our exchange programme with Duke University (North
Carolina) here:
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-
wide-partnership-agreements/north-america/>
https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-w
ide-partnership-agreements/north-america/
Inquiries:
Administrator:
Zarah Weiss
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:summerschool.ivc@univie.ac.at> summerschool.ivc(a)univie.ac.at
Scientific director:
Georg Schiemer
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:georg.schiemer@univie.ac.at> georg.schiemer(a)univie.ac.at
Dear all,
next week, there will be a little Easter break. Please note that our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by the Institute Vienna Circle is Adrien Champougny (IVC Fellow), who will give a talk on April 4, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Adrien Champougny
Reverse Mathematics: Why Should the Philosopher Care About It?
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 04/04/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS 3F
Abstract:
Reverse mathematics is a sub-field of mathematical logic. It is used to, a certain theorem t being given, be able to identify exactly what is needed to prove t. The goal of this talk is to provide a brief introduction to reverse mathematics and to give a few insights on why it is an interesting subject from a philosophical point of view.
I will show how the founding fathers of reverse mathematics (that is Harvey Friedeman and Steven Simpson) offered a first philosophical reading of their work that was mainly ontological in character: according to their view, the goal of reverse mathematics is to identify “[…] which set existence axioms are needed to prove the known theorems of mathematics” [Simpson,2009].
I will then present another way to see the philosophical interest of reverse mathematics that is more focused on the epistemological side. This reading rests on a simple idea: all other things being equal, one has a deeper epistemological control over a constructive proof than over an unconstructive one (I will try to make this concept precise in the course of the presentation). According to this reading, reverse mathematics can be seen as a way to evaluate what kind of knowledge we can hope to acquire concerning a particular mathematical theorem.
Finally, assuming that time permits, I will close my presentation by mentioning a new field of research started by Benedict Eastaugh and Walter Dean: reverse philosophy. The idea in this field is to find an argument in philosophy that somehow rests on a mathematical theorem and to show that this mathematical theorem necessitates some non-trivial mathematical resources to be proven.
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
Workshop on Truth, Definability and Quantification into Sentence
Position
27 and 28 September 2024, University of Vienna
Jointly organised by Max Kölbel, Julio de Rizzo and Benjamin Schnieder
--------
Can truth be defined? Frege argued that it couldn't. Ramsey argued that
defining it would be easy if only we had an analysis of judgement. Today
Horwich claims that truth cannot be defined explicitly because doing so
would require quantification into sentence position and such
quantification is not coherent. Instead he proposes a "minimal theory"
of truth, which comprises all the unproblematic instances of the
equivalence schema. Künne, by contrast, argues that quantification into
sentence position is coherent and may actually be part of some natural
languages. Künne uses such quantification to define truth explicitly:
∀x (x is true iff ∃p ((x is the proposition that p) & p)). Or in
English: a representation (belief, assertion etc) is true just if things
are as it represents them as being. Künne claims also to find this
definition in Frank Ramsey's posthumous work, which, as an exegetical
claim, is not uncontroversial.
Is truth definable? Is propositional quantification coherent? Do natural
languages involve propositional quantification, and in what sense? What
do the answers to these questions mean for philosophical attempts to
define or explain truth? Is truth redundant if explicitly definable? Not
redundant if not explicitly definable? We are interested in these and
related questions (broadly conceived).
--------
Confirmed speakers are:
Peter Fritz (Australian Catholic University)
Paul Horwich (New York University)
Wolfgang Künne (University of Hamburg)
Poppy Mankowitz (University of Bristol)
Cheryl Misak (University of Toronto)
--------
We invite submissions of extended abstracts (1000 words max.) for up to
3 further talks. Please send your anonymized abstracts by 22 March 2024
to truthwien(a)gmail.com. Selected speakers will be notified by mid April.
We will cover accommodation of selected speakers (and on application
offer them a travel subsidy of up to 400 Euros).
This workshop is supported by the FWF Cluster of Excellence project
"Knowledge in Crisis", the FWF project "Truth is Grounded in Facts" and
the University of Vienna.
Dear colleagues,
The History of Philosophy Forum at the University of Notre Dame (USA) is
hosting its annual Spring Colloquium on April 4-5, 2024. Registration is
open to attend the colloquium online or in person on Notre Dame's campus
(registration link: https://forms.gle/Pz9PQG8sjxfYRn276).
This year's theme is *"The Life of the Mind in the History of
Philosophy."* Colloquium participants consider the following issues as
they have appeared across the history of philosophy:
Could we understand thinking as an activity of life, rather than as
an abstract logical operation? How could we make sense of the
(human) mind as something living, or as fundamentally instantiated
by living beings? How can we model the characteristic dynamics of
mental development, self-formation, and personal growth? Is the life
of the mind as real as or even more real than the life of organisms?
This colloquium draws together various models of the ‘life of the
mind’ from across the history of philosophy.
The following scholars are scheduled to present:
* Anne Clausen, University of Göttingen
* Alix Cohen, University of Notre Dame
* Gerad Gentry, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz
* Peter John Hartman, Loyola University Chicago
* Julia Jorati, University of Massachusetts Amherst
* Jari Kaukua, University of Jyväskylä
* Katharina Kraus, Johns Hopkins University
* Hannah Laurens, University of Oxford
* Scott MacDonald, Cornell University
* Wiebke Marie Stock, University of Notre Dame
* Mark Textor, King’s College London
More details about the colloquium, including the schedule of
presentations, can be found on the poster and program attached below, as
well as on the colloquium webpage
(https://historyofphilosophy.nd.edu/colloquium/2024-the-life-of-the-mind-in-…
<https://historyofphilosophy.nd.edu/colloquium/2024-the-life-of-the-mind-in-…>).
Registrants who opt to attend online will receive a zoom link via email
in advance of the colloquium. Registrants attending in person are
invited to join for breakfast and lunch during the colloquium
proceedings. Should any questions arise, please reach out to
historyofphilosophy(a)nd.edu.
With warm regards,
Katharina Kraus, Johns Hopkins University
Stephen Ogden, University of Notre Dame
Therese Cory, University of Notre Dame
---------------------------------------------------------------------
History of Philosophy Forum
University of Notre Dame
https://historyofphilosophy.nd.edu
historyofphilosophy(a)nd.edu
(574) 631-3610 (direct line)
(574) 631-0588 (fax)
430 Geddes Hall
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Dear all,
this is a reminder to come to the next talk organized by APSE – Applied
Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Mirjam Faissner (Charité -
Universitätsmedizin Berlin) will give a talk titled "Epistemic
Oppression and Trans Healthcare". We are very excited about her talk!
Where and When: 21.3.2024, 15:00, HS 3A (NIG).
Abstract:
To understand and communicate our social experiences, we rely on
epistemic resources, such as words, concepts, metaphors, or social
meanings. Yet, which epistemic resources are socially available depends
on power structures. The concept of epistemic oppression, as developed
by Kristie Dotson, is helpful in understanding how power structures
enable and constrain epistemic agency, i. e. our ability to use, develop
and adapt our shared epistemic resources.
In this talk, I argue that institutional epistemologies in healthcare
sustain the epistemic oppression of trans people. More specifically, I
suggest that dominant narratives on transition and detransition
available in healthcare result in hermeneutical injustice and
smothering, two types of epistemic injustice that uphold epistemic
oppression. I discuss consequences of the epistemic oppression of trans
people for trans healthcare.
Bio:
Mirjam Faissner is a medical ethicist working at the Institute of the
History of Medicine and Ethics in Medicine at Charité -
Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Trained as a medical doctor and a
philosopher, she works on questions of structural and epistemic
injustice in healthcare, combining philosophical and empirical research.
Looking forward to seeing you at the talk! Please also let me know if
you would like to join for dinner afterwards :)
All the best,
Flora Löffelmann on behalf of APSE
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
*WIP Series 21.03.2024 - Thursday, HS 3A, NiG - "Katharsis: On the
Platonic Adaptation of an Orphic Idea" by Hermann Crüwell*
Dear all,
This is an email to inform you that the next presentation in the
Work-In-Progress series will be given by Hermann Crüwell (Ernst-Mach
Postdoc, University of Vienna; Ph.D., University of Oxford)) this coming
Thursday. The presentation is entitled "Katharsis: On the Platonic
Adaptation of an Orphic Idea"
Abstract:
At the time when Plato wrote his dialogues, many people sought meaning
and salvation in Orphic mystery cults. In short, Orphism taught that the
soul was once in a state of primordial blessedness in the company of the
gods. Because of an original sin, it fell away from this state and is
now trapped in circles of reincarnation in human bodies. Only initiation
into the Orphic mysteries and purification from its current impure
condition can help the practitioner to be released from this circle,
restore itself in its original condition and attain eternal bliss in the
company of the gods once again.
Plato was critical of these cults, which often demanded fees in exchange
for salvation by purifying rituals and initiation into the mysteries
(cf. Republic 364b–c). At the same time, he took on central concepts and
narratives from the Orphics to give expression to his own philosophical
outlook on the soul, its fate, and its quest for self-perfection.
Focusing on the Phaedo and its concept of katharsis (purification), I
explore how Plato transforms an Orphic idea to conceptualize the soul's
cognitive progress towards wisdom and virtue of character by means of
philosophy.
The meeting will take place in lecture hall 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße
7, 3rd floor) at 17:15 and will last up to 18:45. All are invited to
join us for dinner or drinks afterward. If possible, please let us know
in advance by email.
You can write towip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.atif you have any questions or
would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series in the SoSe24.
Calendar and event information can be found
at:https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team (Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian
Fleisch, Mark Basafa, Sophie Veigl, Nianzu Tu, Raphael Aybar)
Esteemed Colleagues,
We would like to invite you to participate in our conference focusing on
the relationship between identity and virtue in the context of human-AI
interaction which will take place on the 30^th and 31^st of May this
year in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The conference theme encompasses three main
areas of inquiry:
1.
The interplay between identity and virtue(s) in human behavior.
2.
The significance of virtues in shaping human-AI interactions, online
environments and their consequences for identity.
3.
Exploring the plausibility of attributing virtue and identity to
AI-based systems or AI-powered robots.
Our aim will be to elucidate how epistemic identity, encompassing
fundamental beliefs, cognitive processes, and epistemic standards,
intertwines with virtuousness, religious belief(s) and associated
virtues such as humility, largely in connection with newly developed AI
tools. In this we will be examining the connections between virtue
epistemology, AI ethics, and religious studies. Papers are also invited
to explore topics such as the evolution of human epistemic identities in
the context of AI interactions, the possibility of communication and
evolution of religious beliefs within human-AI interactions, the
discernibility of epistemic identity in AI systems and its implications,
and the attribution of virtues or vices to AI entities and their
potential impact on epistemic harm or injustice.
We welcome submissions from diverse fields, including philosophy,
bioethics, theology, computer science, law, and educational sciences.
The conference aims to facilitate interdisciplinary discussions and
welcomes contributions that cut across disciplinary boundaries.
We will be accepting submissions at this email address
(info(a)identity.ethics-ai.eu) until the 29^th of March. Please find
attached more detailed information regarding submission guidelines and
deadlines.
We invite you to participate in this exploration of identity, virtue,
and the evolving dynamics of human-AI interaction. Your contributions
are integral to advancing our understanding of these complex themes.
Best regards,
Matej Kapus
Epistemic Identity and Epistemic Virtue Research Project
in collaboration with Faculty of Theology Ljubljana