CfA: Winter School 2024 | ECPR Standing Group on Kantian Political
Thought | The Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre
WINTER SCHOOL: KANTIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT TODAY
10 December - 12 December, hybrid event, at the European Consortium for
Political Research (ECPR), Harbour House, Colchester
The ECPR'S Kantian Standing Group, in association with the
Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre@Keele University
and the University of Vienna, invites registrations for its hybrid
Winter School which explores the relevance of Kantian political thought
in addressing pressing global challenges of our time such as
environment, climate change, world poverty, human rights, toleration,
pandemic, AI, and migration, among others.
Approximately 15-20 postgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers
are invited to participate to 3 days of themed sessions and discussions
with the additional option of giving a presentation and receiving
feedback from expert scholars leading the sessions, including: Pauline
Kleingeld (University of Groningen), Stefanie Grüne (University of
Cologne), Eric Watkins (University of California), Marcus Willaschek
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt), Luigi Caranti (University of Catania)
and Sorin Baiasu (Keele University); one more speaker will be confirmed
shortly.
Please note: this year, the Winter School will be followed by the
_'Rousseau' Annual Lecture and Conference_, on 12-13 December. The
'Rousseau' Annual Lecturer will be Marcus Willaschek [1]
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) (on "Who Is a Person? Universality and
Exclusion in Kant's Ethics").
The topic of the Annual Conferences will be "Kant on Reason, Metaphysics
and Morality. Themes from the Work of Marcus Willaschek". Application to
the Winter School will grant exclusive access to the two Annual Rousseau
Lectures and Conferences at a discounted rate.
To register, please see: Standing Group on Kantian Political Thought
Winter School, ECPR Harbour House & Online, 10 - 12 December 2024 [2]
Application deadline: 31 July 2024 midnight BST.
For more information, please email the Kantian Standing Group's Event
Officer, Jakob Rendl (Jakob.rendl(a)univie.ac.at).
All welcome!
Links:
------
[1] https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/49558019/Willaschek_Marcus
[2] https://ecpr.eu/Events/281
CfA: Winter School 2024 | ECPR Standing Group on Kantian Political
Thought | The Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre
WINTER SCHOOL: KANTIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT TODAY
10 December - 12 December, hybrid event, at the European Consortium for
Political Research (ECPR), Harbour House, Colchester
The ECPR'S Kantian Standing Group, in association with the
Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre@Keele University
and the University of Vienna, invites registrations for its hybrid
Winter School which explores the relevance of Kantian political thought
in addressing pressing global challenges of our time such as
environment, climate change, world poverty, human rights, toleration,
pandemic, AI, and migration, among others.
Approximately 15-20 postgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers
are invited to participate to 3 days of themed sessions and discussions
with the additional option of giving a presentation and receiving
feedback from expert scholars leading the sessions, including: Pauline
Kleingeld (University of Groningen), Stefanie Grüne (University of
Cologne), Eric Watkins (University of California), Marcus Willaschek
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt), Luigi Caranti (University of Catania)
and Sorin Baiasu (Keele University); one more speaker will be confirmed
shortly.
Please note: this year, the Winter School will be followed by the
_'Rousseau' Annual Lecture and Conference_, on 12-13 December. The
'Rousseau' Annual Lecturer will be Marcus Willaschek [1]
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) (on "Who Is a Person? Universality and
Exclusion in Kant's Ethics").
The topic of the Annual Conferences will be "Kant on Reason, Metaphysics
and Morality. Themes from the Work of Marcus Willaschek". Application to
the Winter School will grant exclusive access to the two Annual Rousseau
Lectures and Conferences at a discounted rate.
To register, please see: Standing Group on Kantian Political Thought
Winter School, ECPR Harbour House & Online, 10 - 12 December 2024 [2]
Application deadline: 31 July 2024 midnight BST.
For more information, please email the Kantian Standing Group's Event
Officer, Jakob Rendl (Jakob.rendl(a)univie.ac.at).
All welcome!
Links:
------
[1] https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/49558019/Willaschek_Marcus
[2] https://ecpr.eu/Events/281
-------- Originalnachricht --------
Betreff: Mit der Bitte um Aushang und Verbreitung: Einladung zum 11.
Kongress der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie
Datum: 18.07.2024 20:54
Von: Laurin Mackowitz <laurin.mackowitz(a)uni-graz.at>
An: <info(a)oegp.org>
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
wir möchten Sie auf die Verlängerung der deadline für den Call for
Papers für den 11. Kongress der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für
Philosophie "Zukunft denken" hinweisen. Der Kongress wird vom 25. bis
28. Februar 2025 an der Universität Graz stattfinden. Die neue deadline
ist der 31. August 2024.
Wir bitten, den Call an Ihrem Institut zu verbreiten und insbesondere
auch Doktorand*innen und Nachwuchswissenschafter*innen zu einer
Einreichung zu ermuntern.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Daniela Camhy (Präsidentin der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für
Philosophie)
Laurin Mackowitz (Generalsekretär der Österreichischen Gesellschaft
für Philosophie)
*****
English version below
*****
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS:
11. KONGRESS DER ÖSTERREICHISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT FÜR PHILOSOPHIE
_ZUKUNFT DENKEN_
25. BIS 28. FEBRUAR 2025
UNIVERSITÄT GRAZ
Der 11. Kongress der Österreichische Gesellschaft für Philosophie vom
25. bis 28. Februar 2025 in Graz widmet sich dem thematischen
Schwerpunkt „Zukunft denken“.
In der Philosophie wird nicht nur nach-, sondern auch mit- und
vorgedacht, und zwar im Grundlegenden. Wie sich Zukunft denken lässt,
beschäftigt jedoch nicht nur die Philosophie, sondern Gesellschaften
und Menschen allgemein, heute mehr denn je und das auf globaler Ebene.
Die Zukunft birgt Chancen und Risiken. Wissenschaften, Künste,
Unternehmen und Alltagskulturen imaginieren Möglichkeiten, simulieren
Szenarien, versuchen sowohl theoretisch als auch empirisch über
Konsequenzen nachzudenken und Beziehungen zwischen Bildungs-, Wissens-
und Gesellschaftsentwicklung kritisch zu betrachten und neue
Konzeptionen zu erarbeiten.
Die Philosophie kann nicht beantworten, welche Zukunft die Menschheit
erwartet, aber sie kann ihren Beitrag zu Fragen leisten wie: Wie
unterscheiden wir Zukunft von der Gegenwart und diese von der
Vergangenheit? Was heißt es für die menschliche Lebensweise in der
Zeit zu existieren? Wie weit reicht der Gestaltungsbereich von Menschen?
Worin gründet der Wunsch, durch technische Entwicklungen der
Vergänglichkeit zu entrinnen? Welchen Einfluss haben Technologien auf
das menschliche Selbstverständnis, auf die Arbeit und das Leben?
Welches Denken kann dazu beitragen, die Herausforderungen des
Klimawandels, der Globalisierung, der Digitalisierung, der Künstlichen
Intelligenz und der militärischen Auseinandersetzungen zu bewältigen?
Wie kann Bildung neu gedacht werden? Welche Verantwortung haben heute
lebende Menschen gegenüber zukünftigen Generationen? Wie viel
Philosophie steckt in Science-Fiction? Welche Bedeutung kann die
Philosophie auch in Zukunft haben, nicht zuletzt an
Bildungseinrichtungen und Universitäten?
In diesem Kontext eröffnet der 11. Kongress der Österreichischen
Gesellschaft für Philosophie ein mehrtägiges Forum, wo gemeinsam
Zukunft gedacht wird.
Allgemeine Sektionen:
• Metaphysik und Ontologie
• Ethik
• Politische Philosophie
• Sozial- und Rechtsphilosophie
• Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie
• Logik und Sprachphilosophie
• Technikphilosophie und Anthropologie
• Ästhetik, Kultur- und Geschichtsphilosophie
• Geschichte der Philosophie
• Religionsphilosophie
• Kinder- und Jugendphilosophie
• Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik
• Philosophie des Geistes
Abstracts und Titelvorschläge:
Bitte senden Sie Ihr Abstract in Deutsch oder Englisch inklusive
Vortragstitel und Sektionszuordnung (max. 300 Wörter) sowie eine
Kurzbiographie (max. 200 Wörter) und fünf Keywords bis 31. August 2024
an:
info(a)oegp.org
Eine Rückmeldung über Ihr eingereichtes Abstract erhalten Sie bis
Anfang November 2024.
Länge der Vorträge:
max. 30 Minuten (plus 10 Minuten Diskussion)
Kongresssprachen:
Deutsch, Englisch
Der 28. Februar 2025 ist für Workshops und Panels reserviert.
Vorschläge sind ausdrücklich willkommen.
Plenarvorträge: Tim Crane, Josef Mitterer, Elisabeth Nemeth
Eröffnung: Institut für Philosophie der Universität Graz
Kontakt und Information: Laurin Mackowitz, Dr.Mag.Bakk.phil.,
Universitätsassistent, Institut für Philosophie,
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Heinrichstraße 26/III, 8010 Graz,
Austria, Generalsekretär der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für
Philosophie, laurin.mackowitz(a)uni-graz.at
Kongressgebühren:
ÖGP-Mitglieder: € 60.-
Nichtmitglieder: € 120.-
Studierende: keine
*****
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS:
11TH CONGRESS OF THE AUSTRIAN SOCIETY FOR PHILOSOPHY
_THINKING THE FUTURE_
FEBRUARY 25TH TO 28TH, 2025
UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ
The 11th Congress of the Austrian Society for Philosophy will take place
from February 25th to 28th, 2025 at the University of Graz. It is
dedicated to the thematic focus „Thinking the Future“.
Philosophy not only involves abstract thought, but also the act of
envisioning and anticipating what lies ahead at a fundamental level.
However, contemplating the future concerns not only philosophy but also
societies and people in general – today more than ever and on a global
level. The future holds opportunities and risks. Sciences, the arts,
businesses and everyday cultures imagine possibilities and simulate
scenarios. They try to think both theoretically and empirically about
the consequences and the relationships between the development of
education, knowledge and society.
Philosophy cannot answer what future awaits humanity, but it can
contribute to questions such as: How do we distinguish the future from
the present and the present from the past? What are the consequences for
life to exist in time? How far can humans extend their scope of
influence and domination? What underlies the desire to escape mortality
through technological developments? What influence do technologies have
on human self-understanding, on work and life? What ways of thinking can
help in addressing the challenges posed by climate change,
globalization, digitalization, artificial intelligence and military
conflicts? How can education be rethought and what options for shaping
the future should be developed? What responsibilities and obligations do
people living today have towards future generations? What is the
relation between philosophy and science fiction? What will be the role
of philosophy in the future, in particular at educational institutions
and universities?
In this context, the 11th Congress of the Austrian Society for
Philosophy opens a forum for thinking together about the future.
General sections:
• Metaphysics and ontology
• Ethics
• Political philosophy
• Social and legal philosophy
• Epistemology and philosophy of science
• Logic and philosophy of language
• Philosophy of technology and anthropology
• Aesthetics, philosophy of culture and history
• History of philosophy
• Philosophy of religion
• Philosophy for/with children and youth
• Didactics of philosophy and ethics
• Philosophy of mind
Abstracts and title suggestions:
Please send your abstract in German or English including the paper title
and section assignment (max. 300 words) as well as a short biography
(max. 200 words) and five keywords by August 31st, 2024 to:
info(a)oegp.org
Feedback on your submitted abstract will be provided by the beginning of
November 2024.
Length of the presentations:
max. 30 minutes (plus 10 minutes discussion)
Congress languages:
German, English
February 28th, 2025 is reserved for workshops and panels. Suggestions
are expressly welcomed.
Plenary lectures: Tim Crane, Josef Mitterer, Elisabeth Nemeth
Opening: Department of Philosophy of the University of Graz.
Contact and information: Laurin Mackowitz, Dr.Mag.Bakk.phil., University
Assistant, Department of Philosophy, Karl-Franzens-University Graz,
Heinrichstraße 26/III, 8010 Graz, Austria, Secretary General of the
Austrian Society of Philosophy, laurin.mackowitz(a)uni-graz.at
Congress fees:
ÖGP members: € 60.-
Non-members: € 120.-
Students: free
--
Mag. Dr.phil Laurin Mackowitz, Bakk.phil.
Universitätsassistent
Arbeitsbereich Klassische Phänomenologie
Institut für Philosophie
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Heinrichstraße 26/III, 8010 Graz, Austria
https://philosophie-gewi.uni-graz.at/de/ueber-das-institut/leitung-und-mita…
Generalsekretär der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie
https://oegp.org/
Nationaler Forschungspartner im FWF-Projekt: "Membership Metaphors as
'Doorkeepers'. Metaphorical Language in Philosophical Discourses on
Migration and Refuge"
http://metaphorology.net/
Podcast: Stimmen Politischer Philosophie
https://cba.media/author/laurin-mackowitz
CfA: Winter School 2024 | ECPR Standing Group on Kantian Political
Thought | The Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre
WINTER SCHOOL: KANTIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT TODAY
10 December - 12 December, hybrid event, at the European Consortium for
Political Research (ECPR), Harbour House, Colchester
The ECPR'S Kantian Standing Group, in association with the
Keele-Oxford-St Andrews Kantian (KOSAK) Research Centre@Keele University
and the University of Vienna, invites registrations for its hybrid
Winter School which explores the relevance of Kantian political thought
in addressing pressing global challenges of our time such as
environment, climate change, world poverty, human rights, toleration,
pandemic, AI, and migration, among others.
Approximately 15-20 postgraduate students and postdoctoral researchers
are invited to participate to 3 days of themed sessions and discussions
with the additional option of giving a presentation and receiving
feedback from expert scholars leading the sessions, including: Pauline
Kleingeld (University of Groningen), Stefanie Grüne (University of
Cologne), Eric Watkins (University of California), Marcus Willaschek
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) and Sorin Baiasu (Keele University); two
more speakers will be confirmed shortly.
Please note: this year, the Winter School will be followed by the
_'Rousseau' Annual Lecture and Conference_, on 12-13 December. The
'Rousseau' Annual Lecturer will be Marcus Willaschek [1]
(Goethe-Universität Frankfurt) (on "Who Is a Person? Universality and
Exclusion in Kant's Ethics").
The topic of the Annual Conferences will be "Kant on Reason, Metaphysics
and Morality. Themes from the Work of Marcus Willaschek". Application to
the Winter School will grant exclusive access to the two Annual Rousseau
Lectures and Conferences at a discounted rate.
To register, please see: Standing Group on Kantian Political Thought
Winter School, ECPR Harbour House & Online, 10 - 12 December 2024 [2]
Application deadline: 31 July 2024 midnight BST.
For more information, please email the Kantian Standing Group's Event
Officer, Jakob Rendl (Jakob.rendl(a)univie.ac.at).
All welcome!
Links:
------
[1] https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/49558019/Willaschek_Marcus
[2] https://ecpr.eu/Events/281
*Von:*IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme <MSCFP(a)iaea.org>
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 12. Juli 2024 15:47
*An:* IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme <MSCFP(a)iaea.org>
*Betreff:* IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme
(MSCFP)-Application Call Now Open
Dear Recipient,
*Spread the word! The IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme
(MSCFP) next application call is now open and will close on 30 September
2024. To read more about the programme and eligibility requirements,
please visit the link:*IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme
| IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/about/overview/gender-at-the-iaea/iaea-marie-sklodowsk…>
and Information for applicants | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/about/overview/gender-at-the-iaea/iaea-marie-sklodowsk…>.
The IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme (MSCFP) was
launched in 2020 by the IAEA Director General to increase the number of
women in the nuclear field, supporting an inclusive workforce of men and
women who contribute to and drive global scientific and technological
innovation.
The programme aims to inspire and encourage women to pursue a career in
the nuclear related field, by providing highly motivated female students
with scholarships for master’s programmes and an opportunity to pursue
an internship facilitated by the IAEA. Scholarships are awarded annually.
In the selection of students, consideration is given to geographic and
field of study diversity, in addition to eligibility requirements and
other criteria. The selected students are awarded up to €20,000 for
tuition costs and up to €20,000 for living costs for their master’s
programme (the amount will vary depending on the duration of the
programme, costs associated with tuition as well as location of the
studies). Upon completion of their studies, students who pursue an
internship facilitated by the IAEA, in line with their specialization in
the nuclear field, are also provided with a stipend for up to 12 months.
The internships may take place at the IAEA or in nuclear organizations
in the public or private sector. Additionally, students are provided
with opportunities to attend and participate in various educational,
professional, and networking events. MSCFP recipients also have a chance
to become a part of the programme’ s LinkedIn Student and Alumni Group
where they can connect with their peers and exchange knowledge and
experience, as well as find out about technical events and career
opportunities. *Since its launch in 2020, MSCFP has received 2271
applications, selecting 560 students from 121 nationalities studying in
72 countries worldwide. By end of March 2024, 201 students have already
completed their master’s programme with support of MSCFP. From these
graduates, 110 have been confirmed for an internship facilitated by the
IAEA at the IAEA departments and labs (Seibersdorf and Monaco), IAEA
Collaborating Centres, and other nuclear organizations in the public or
private sector in various countries The internships are linked to the
students’ areas of specialization in fields ranging from nuclear energy,
nuclear science and applications, nuclear non-proliferation, nuclear
safety and security and nuclear law. The remaining graduates have
pursued PhD studies or obtained employment in their field. The
programme is envisaged to grow each year to ensure more women have an
opportunity to pursue advanced education in the nuclear related field.*
*To encourage broad dissemination of the information, we would greatly
appreciate if this communication can be shared within your university
for further distribution among relevant academic faculties, career and
financial support services and female students pursuing master’s degree
education in nuclear related fields. We would be grateful if you can
kindly disseminate this information on your website and via your social
media as well as display our promotional material at the university
premises and relevant platforms. *
More information about the programme:
Meet the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme students | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/about/overview/gender-at-the-iaea/meet-the-mscfp-stude…>
Watch Marie Curie Fellowship Programme
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df5VQtluooA&list=PLCsYX9QVCDTEirWGcjgDrwzN_…>
MSCFP brochure
<https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/24/02/mscfp-brochure_feb_2024.pdf>
Related Articles:
IAEA Marks International Women’s Day by Celebrating More Women in
Nuclear | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-marks-international-womens-day-by…>
International Women’s Day – Nuclear Needs More Women | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/videos/international-womens-day-…>
Supporting the Next Generation: An IAEA Spotlight on Women in Nuclear
Sciences and Applications | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/supporting-the-next-generation-an-iaea…>
IAEA Profile: Shifting Focus From Pharmaceutical Chemistry to Blue
Carbon | IAEA
<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-profile-shifting-focus-from-pharm…>
**
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
**
*IAEA Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship Programme Team*
*International Atomic Energy Agency*| Vienna International Centre, PO
Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria |
Email: *MSCFP(a)iaea.org* <mailto:MSCFP@iaea.org>
Follow us on *www.iaea.org* <http://www.iaea.org/>
<http://www.iaea.org/><http://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg><http://www.youtube.com/user/IAEAvideo><http://twitter.com/iaeaorg><http://www.flickr.com/photos/iaea_imagebank/><http://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea>
This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient.
Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be
privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to
this message and then delete it from your system.
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
leite ich zur Information weiter.
Liebe Grüße
Institutskoordination
-------- Originalnachricht --------
Betreff: Stipendium/Mailingliste
Datum: 01.07.2024 08:29
Von: Rebecca MOSSOP <stipendium(a)philosophicum.com>
An: philosophie(a)univie.ac.at
Liebe KollegInnen,
bitte gerne auf Ihre Mailingliste setzen und unter den Studierenden
verteilen. Vielen Dank und eine schöne Woche,
liebe Grüße Rebecca Mossop
Writing Week
Are you also planning on writing your dissertation/ Master's Thesis/
Bachelor's Thesis/ Seminar paper in July? Come join us (in an
air-conditioned room)!
The Wiener Forum für Analytische Philosophie and the Vienna Doctoral
School of Philosophy are co-organising two writing weeks from Monday-
Friday 15.07.-27.07.2024 in room 2H, NIG, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010
Vienna.
Schedule:
8:50-9:00 Welcome
9:00-9:50 1st writing period (50 min)
9:50-10:00 Break
10:00-11:30 2nd writing period (90 min)
11:30-12:00 Break
12:00-12:50 3rd writing period (50 min)
12:50-14:00 LUNCH BREAK
14:00-14:50 4th writing period (50 min)
14:50-15:00 Break
15:00-15:50 5th writing period (50 min)
15:50-16:00 Break
16:00-16:50 6th writing period (50 min)
Information:
* If you want to sleep in and join for the later sessions, or join
only for the early sessions - no problem! But please join during the
short breaks for the sake of our concentration.
* No registration needed, but if you like to register, such that there
is more commitment to coming, feel free to send an email to:
eva.hijlkema(a)univie.ac.at
* We will provide snacks, in case you want to share your favourite
snack with us, feel free to bring!
* Doctoral, Master and Bachelor students welcome!
Looking forward to seeing you there!
English version below
Liebe Studierende!
das Wiener Forum für Analytische Philosophie (WFAP) organisiert vom 4.
bis 6. Juli seine 13. Graduiertenkonferenz: “Wait, what?! A Graduate
Conference on Nonsense and Category Mistakes”. Die Konferenz ist eine
hervorragende Möglichkeit für Studierende und Jungforscher*innen mit
international anerkannten Forscher*innen in Kontakt zu treten.
Studierende aller Studienabschnitte sind herzlich willkommen!
KEYNOTES:
Adrian Moore (Oxford)
Ofra Magidor (Oxford)
Rachel Wiseman (Liverpool) & Clare MacCumhail (Durham)
ORT: Hörsaal 3A & 3F, Institut für Philosophie, NIG
FORMAT: Hybrid
DATUM: 4. - 6. Juli 2024
ANMELDUNG: nicht notwendig
Weitere Informationen sowie ein vollständiges Programm könnt ihr unserer
Website entnehmen:
https://wfap.philo.at/conferences/13th-wfap-graduate-conference/
Wir freuen uns auf euer Kommen!
Mit lieben Grüßen,
Veronika Lassl
(Kassiererin WFAP)
——-/-/——-
English version
Dear Students,
the Vienna Forum for Analytic Philosophy (WFAP) is organizing its 13th
graduate conference on the 4th to 6th of July. The title is “Wait,
what?! A Graduate Conference on Nonsense and Category Mistakes”. The
conference is an excellent opportunity for students and junior academics
to get in contact with internationally recognized keynote speakers. We
welcome students of all levels!
KEYNOTES:
Adrian Moore (Oxford)
Ofra Magidor (Oxford)
Rachel Wiseman (Liverpool) & Clare MacCumhail (Durham)
VENUE: lecture halls 3A & 3F, Institute for Philosophy, NIG
FORMAT: hybrid
DATES: 4th - 6th of July
REGISTRATION: not necessary
For the full programme and more information, visit our website:
https://wfap.philo.at/conferences/13th-wfap-graduate-conference/
Looking forward to seeing you there!
Best,
Veronika Lassl
(WFAP treasurer)
INVITATION
Paul Feyerabend and Austrian Philosophy - His Formative Years in Postwar
Vienna
International Conference - July 5-6, 2024
University of Vienna, Aula at Campus, Court 1, Entrance 1.11
<https://www.pkfcentennial.org/> https://www.pkfcentennial.org/
Paul K. Feyerabend (1924-1994), one of the most stimulating and
controversial figures of Twentieth-Century philosophy, spent most of his
formative years in postwar Vienna (1946-1955). Born in Red Vienna,
Feyerabend came of age at the time of the Nazi Anschluss and completed his
philosophical apprenticeship at the University of Vienna during the Allied
occupation. At the time of his university studies in philosophy and physics,
Feyerabend animated the so-called Third Vienna Circle (1949-1953) around
Viktor Kraft in the context of the Austrian College Society, and actively
participated in the European Forum Alpbach and in the Institut für
Wissenschaft und Kunst. In addition, he served as a research assistant to
Arthur Pap, who spent 1953/54 as a Fulbright visiting professor at the
University of Vienna.
The international conference Paul Feyerabend and Austrian Philosophy aims
at exploring the milieu which shaped Feyerabends intellectual development
with a focus on his interaction with university teachers and intellectual
figures such as members of the former Vienna Circle like Viktor Kraft,
Philipp Frank, Herbert Feigl, and Rudolf Carnap, physicists like Felix
Ehrenhaft and Walter Thirring, as well as with Walter Hollitscher and Ludwig
Wittgenstein. Contacts continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s at the
London School of Economics with Karl Popper and, later, with Imre Lakatos,
and in Minneapolis, at Feigls Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science,
where Feyerabend published his pathbreaking Against Method for the first
time in 1970.
A special symposium on the publication of Feyerabends Formative Years,
edited by Matteo Collodel and Eric Oberheim (Springer Nature, two volumes)
will be held as part of this conference.
The conference is organized by the Institute Vienna Circle (University of
Vienna) and by the Vienna Circle Society. It is partnered with the
subsequent HOPOS 2024, the Fifteenth International Congress of the
International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, University
of Vienna, July 8-12, 2024, and it contributes to the Feyerabend 2024
Centennial celebrations.
Keynote Speakers:
Vasso Kindi (University of Athens)
Martin Kusch (University of Vienna)
Speakers:
Ulrich Arnswald, Jordi Cat, David Chandler, Matteo Collodel, Margaretha
Hendrickx, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Rita Kimijima-Dennemayer, Artur Koterski,
Daniel Kuby, Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau, Eric Oberheim, John Preston, Marij
van Strien, Gerrit Tiefenthal, Natalia Tomashpolskaja
Registration required ( <mailto:vcs@univie.ac.at> vcs(a)univie.ac.at)
There will be no registration fee.
Organizing Committee:
Friedrich Stadler (University of Vienna)
Matteo Collodel (Ca Foscari University of Venice)
Daniel Kuby (University of Konstanz)
Queries and Questions:
matteo.collodel[at] <http://unive.it> unive.it
friedrich.stadler[at] <http://univie.ac.at> univie.ac.at
For more information visit: <https://vcs.univie.ac.at/>
https://vcs.univie.ac.at/
In addition:
Wiener Vorlesung
<https://vorlesungen.wien.gv.at/paul-feyerabend-04072024/> Panel Discussion
on the occassion of the centennial of the Vienna Circle (Schlick Circle) and
Paul Feyerabend
July 4, 2024, Town Hall, 5pm
(Panel: Helga Nowotny, Elisabeth Nemeth, Karl Sigmund, Friedrich Stadler)
Phänomenologische Forschungen - 26. Juni 2024 - David W. Johnson:
Intersubjective Phenomenality: Kimura, Merleau-Ponty, Arendt (Vortrag)
Liebe Kolleg_innen,
wir möchten Sie herzlich zur folgenden Veranstaltung der
„Phänomenologischen Forschungen“ einladen:
*David W. Johnson (Boston)*
*»Intersubjective Phenomenality: Kimura, Merleau-Ponty, Arendt«*
VORTRAG: Mi, 26.06.2024, 18.30-20.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 3A, Institut für
Philosophie, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
Organisation: Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner in Zusammenarbeit
mit Bianca Boteva-Richter und Graham Parkes
https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…
Mit besten Grüßen,
Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Aleksandra Knežević (IVC Fellow), who
will give a talk on June 27, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM TALK: ALEKSANDRA KNEŽEVIĆ
A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FEMINIST ANTHROPOLOGY OF SCIENCE
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 27/06/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
In this talk, I will unpack different facets of the question of what it
means to do anthropology of science as a feminist. In the first part, I
will examine the tradition of feminist philosophers of science
discussing the possibility of feminist science. Then, I will discuss
what a critical scientific perspective_ _entails in anthropology.
Finally, I will integrate these two bodies of knowledge to explore what
a feminist anthropology of science could mean in terms of its scientific
practice. In the second part, I will focus on a related issue, which I
call _the problem of normativity_ - the claim that science loses its
crucial feature, objectivity, when influenced by feminism (or any other
worldview). Despite well-established knowledge in feminist philosophy of
science and 'values in science' discussions, which offer resolutions to
this problem, I contend that confusion persists about what a critical
perspective, such as a feminist one, implies for scientific reasoning
and research aims. I will argue that the problem of normativity involves
two aspects, which are often confused: first, whether values play a role
in the context of justification, and second, whether a critical social
scientist, in order to be critical, must go beyond description. I will
address both issues by relying on mainstream claims from contemporary
philosophy of science and will draw conclusions from this discussion for
theorizing a feminist anthropology of science.
Call für Papers SWIP Symposium 2024
Termin: Freitag/Samstag 15./16.November 2024
Ort: Wird bekannt gegeben (noch nicht sicher)
Tagungssprachen: Deutsch und Englisch
Tagungsthema:
Gemeinschaft/Gesellschaft neu gestalten – Herausforderungen für
Philosophie in Theorie und Praxis
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Brigitte Buchhammer
**
*Dear Colleagues,*
*
This is an email to invite you to the next presentations in the WIP
series. The meeting will take place in lecture hall 3A (NIG,
Universitätsstraße 7, 3rd floor) at 17:00 and will last up to 18:30.
Pia-Zoe Hahne (University of Vienna):
"‘Trust the Machine?’: Conceptualising Trust in the Age of Generative
Artificial Intelligence"
To accept a new technology, we first need to trust it. With AI, there is
not just one specific kind of trust that we put in the system; instead,
it is a “multidimensional construct, including trust in functionality,
trust in reliability, and trust in data protection” (Wang, Lin & Shao,
2022, p. 340). However, trust in AI is often only conceptualised as an
epistemic trust (Alvaro, 2023; Ryan, 2020). These approaches to study
conceptual disruptions often remain abstract and disregard the
involvement of stakeholders. This is where a new approach in engaging
with conceptual disruptions comes in. Conceptual engineering is an
emerging approach in philosophy of technology. It stresses the
connection between empirical research and conceptual analysis (Löhr,
2023). Conceptual misalignment is relevant for AI as it describes a
scenario in which concepts seem applicable while hiding “an underlying
value misalignment” (Marchiori & Scharp, 2024, p. 2), resulting in
ethical problems. Trust is an ideal concept for conceptual engineering
as it forms the basis for other concepts and disruptions therefore have
farreaching consequences. Löhr (2023) and Marchiori & Sharp (2024)
specifically points out that studying these disruptions necessitates
empirical data, demonstrating a new turn in engaging with conceptual
disruptions. The intense disruptions influenced by AI present new
challenges by moving away from a purely epistemic view on trust in
technology as well as the far-reaching consequences on trust between
people and trust in institutions. I present a new approach to study
conceptual disruptions by moving beyond abstract conceptual analysis and
into practical uses of concepts and empirical data through conceptual
engineering.
Dominik Boll (VU University Amsterdam)
"Taking Responsibility: With or Without You?"
My topic in this talk is talking responsibility and its place in our
responsibility practices. The literature on responsibility has blossomed
and turned to ever finer specialisation in the last decades, and yet the
primary focus often remains on _ holding responsible_. Philosophers have
increasingly turned to theorising our responsibility _practices_—how
blaming and praising are _socialised_ phenomena, how holding responsible
is something we _do _between each other beyond blame as a mental
state—but there is still much focus on what the blamer does or is
licenced to do.
Few theorists focus on the perspective on the other side of
responsibility interactions. While there are large literatures on guilt,
apologies, or making amends, writers rarely take the general
first-personal perspective of the party responding to their own
infraction, investigating what it is for the agent to react to what they
have done, what they are required to do to deal with it, and what
precisely their response aims at. This presents an activity distinct
from holding oneself responsible (Bero 2020). Indeed, the need to
respond to our actions and their significance is an omnipresent aspect
of our moral lives. We hold others responsible for what they do, and we
take responsibility for what we do.
This is not, however, how taking responsibility is currently theorised.
Departing from Wolf (2001), philosophers have proposed different
accounts of taking responsibility (Enoch 2012; Sliwa 2024; Mason 2019).
They differ in their assumptions and goals but theorise something
similar—how we react to (some of) our own morally consequential
actions such as to accommodate its fallout for others. Notably, however,
taking responsibility is captured as something entirely internal to the
wrongdoer and not as an interpersonal practice parallel to holding
responsible. In this paper, I theorise this interpersonal phenomenon.
I first explicate two common threads in the literature on taking
responsibility. Taking responsibility is theorised as something which
the agent can do all by themselves, yet taking responsibility is
supposed to be essentially interpersonal. I argue that this presents a
tension and leaves a lacuna to theorise a broader account of taking
responsibility. I then advance two arguments to show that such an
account is needed for making sense of the full extent of our
responsibility practices. Lastly, I provide the contours of such an
account as an activity which achieves certain aims between its parties.
This embeds taking responsibility in the broader web of our
responsibility practices and resolves the tension. If my action has a
morally significant impact on you, I can only take responsibility with
you, not without you.
You can write to wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at if you have any questions
or would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series.
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team
Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian Fleisch, Mark Basafa,
Sophie Veigl, Raphael Aybar, Nianzu Tu
*
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren!
Die *Arbeiterkammer Oberösterreich* schreibt *2025* zum*42. Mal *den
*AK-Wissenschaftspreis österreichweit* aus!
*Für junge Forscher:innen/Studierende werden erstmals zwei
Wissenschaftspreise vergeben: *
*Preis-Kategorie A: *Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche Artikel
(*Preisgeld bis zu 3.000.- Euro*):**Dissertationen und wissenschaftliche
Artikel | Arbeiterkammer Oberösterreich
<https://ooe.arbeiterkammer.at/beratung/bildung/bildungsfoerderungen/akwisse…>**
*Preis-Kategorie B: *Master-/Diplomarbeiten zum Themenschwerpunkt
„Künstliche Intelligenz“**(*Förderung bis zu 1.000.-, Veröffentlichung
der Master-/Diplomarbeit*):**AK-Wissenschaftspreis 2025 | Arbeiterkammer
Oberösterreich
<https://ooe.arbeiterkammer.at/beratung/bildung/bildungsfoerderungen/akwisse…>**
**
*Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Sie unsere Ausschreibungen verbreiten
könnten – Danke!!*
Freundliche Grüße
*Mag. Markus Unterthurner*
Abteilung Wirtschafts-, Sozial- und Gesellschaftspolitik
Koordination Wissenschaftspreis
<https://ooe.arbeiterkammer.at/wissenschaftspreis>
Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte
für Oberösterreich
Volksgartenstraße 40, 4020 Linz
TEL +43 (0)50 6906-2447
FAX +43 (0)50 6906-62447
E-MAIL unterthurner.m(a)akooe.at <mailto:unterthurner.m@akooe.at>
E.MAIL wissenschaftspreis(a)akooe.at <mailto:wissenschaftspreis@akooe.at>
WEBSITE ooo.arbeiterkammer.at
*Mitglieder der AK Oberösterreich genießen viele Vorteile und
Vergünstigungen. *
*Der Schlüssel zur gesamten AK-Vorteilswelt ist die AK-Leistungskarte. *
*Als App am Smartphone immer dabei! Alle Infos hier
<https://ooe.arbeiterkammer.at/service/apps/AK_Leistungskarte_digital.html>.*
Phänomenologische Forschungen – 20./21. Juni 2024 – Thomas Fuchs:
Verteidigung des Menschen. Plädoyer für einen verkörperten Humanismus
(Vortrag und Workshop)
Liebe Kolleg_innen,
wir möchten Sie herzlich zur nächsten Veranstaltung der Vortragsreihe
„Phänomenologische Forschungen“ einladen:
20./21.06.2024
Thomas Fuchs (Universität Heidelberg)
"Verteidigung des Menschen. Plädoyer für einen verkörperten Humanismus"
VORTRAG: Do., 20.06.2024, 18.30–20.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 3D, Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
WORKSHOP: Fr., 21.06.2024, 09.00–12.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 2H, Institut für
Philosophie der Universität Wien, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien
Für die Texte des Workshops - Mail an: gerhard.unterthurner(a)univie.ac.at
Organisation: Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner in Zusammenarbeit
mit Florian Schmidsberger
https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…
<https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…>
In Kooperation mit Gruppe Phänomenologie
Mit besten Grüßen,
Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner
Liebe Interessierte, dear all,
ich lade Sie herzlich ein zur Teilnahme an dem unten stehenden Workshop
/ I cordially invite you to participate in the workshop described below,
der ersten Veranstaltung in der Reihe / the first event in the series:
Philosophie und Ethik in Schule und Gesellschaft: Schule und Universität
zusammendenken
Herzliche Grüße / best regards
Arne Moritz
Professur für Ethik in Schule und Gesellschaft
Workshop
Mündliche Leistungsbewertungen kompetenzorientiert gestalten im Ethik-
und Philosophieunterricht
Workshop am Freitag 21.6.2024, 15-16.30 Uhr (HS 3B, R.315, Neues
Institutsgebäude (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, 3. Stock)
und am Freitag 27.9.2024, 15-18:15 Uhr (Ort wird noch bekannt gegeben)
Der Workshop richtet sich an alle Interessierten (Lehrkräfte,
Studierende, weitere Öffentlichkeit), die sich zum Thema mündliche
Leistungsbewertung in den Fächern Ethik/Philosophie (etwa im
Zusammenhang der Matura-Prüfung) fachlich austauschen und persönlich
vernetzen möchten. Beim ersten Termin im Juni wird es einen kurzen
inhaltlichen Input aus fachdidaktischer Perspektive geben, in dem vor
allem die Anforderung "Kompetenzorientierung" in zwei Weisen übersetzt
und erläutert werden soll: a) hinsichtlich konzeptioneller Anforderungen
und b) hinsichtlich praktischer Gestaltungen von mündlichen
Leistungsbewertungssituationen im Ethik- und Philosophieunterricht. Im
gemeinsamen Gespräch sollen von dort aus Interessenschwerpunkte und
Herausforderungen identifiziert werden, die beim Termin im September
weiter bearbeitet werden könnten. Unterschiedliche Formate sind denkbar,
z.B. das Gespräch über fachdidaktische Vorschläge zum Thema
Leistungsbewertung, die im Zeitraum zwischen Juni und September von den
Teilnehmenden gelesen werden - und/oder der Austausch über die
Herausforderungen und Möglichkeiten konkreter Aufgabenerstellungen,
ausgehend von vorgegebenen Materialien, usw.
Eine Anmeldung ist nicht erforderlich.
Die Teilnahme am Termin im Juni verpflichtet nicht zur Teilnahme im
September.
The workshop (which is held in German) is aimed at all interested
persons (teachers, students, other people from the public) who would
like to exchange ideas on the topic of oral assessment in the school
subjects of ethics/philosophy (e.g. in connection with the Matura
examination) and who would like to network personally. At the first
meeting in June, there will be a brief input from a didactical
perspective, in which the requirement of "competence orientation" will
be interpreted and explained in two ways: a) with regard to conceptual
requirements and b) with regard to the practical design of oral
assessment situations in ethics and philosophy education. From there,
key points of interest and the relevant challenges are to be identified
in a joint discussion, which could be worked on further at the meeting
in September. Different formats are available, e.g. a discussion on
didactical texts on the subject of assessment, which participants will
read in the period between June and September - and/or an exchange on
the challenges and opportunities of designing actual assessment
exercises based on given materials, etc.
Registration is not required.
Participation in the June event does not require to participate in
September.
--
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arne Moritz
Professur für Ethik in Schule und Gesellschaft
Fakultät für Philosophie und Bildungswissenschaft
Institut für Philosophie/Zentrum für Lehrer*innenbildung
Universität Wien
https://homepage.univie.ac.at/arne.holger.moritz/
Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG)
Universitätsstraße 7
Stiege I, Gang A, R. 312
1010 Wien
Sehr geehrte Kolleg:innen,
ich möchte Sie im Namen von Khôra herzlich zum nächsten Colloquium einladen.
Termin: 20.06.2024, 18:30 - 20:00, Hörsaal 2H, Neues Institutsgebäude (NIG)
Thema: Kritik der Philosophie – Philosophie der Kritik. Marx, Engels und die deutsche Ideologie mit einem Input von Hannah Zipser
Für einen Auszug aus Die deutsche Ideologie (S.13-36) schreiben Sie mir bitte persönlich, ich sende diesen gerne auf Anfrage zu.
Weitere Informationen sowie eine Mailingliste finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.
https://www.khora.philo.at/
Danach ist im Café Gagarin reserviert, wo wir den Abend gemeinsam ausklingen lassen.
Wir freuen uns auf euch!
Liebe Grüße
Sebastian Krach
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Antonio Piccolomini d'Aragona (IVC
Fellow), who will give a talk on June 20, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Antonio Piccolomini d'Aragona
SUNDHOLM'S SEMANTICS: LOGICAL ATAVISM AND THE NATURE OF PROOFS
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 20/06/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
I aim at providing an overview of some of Sundholm's observations on the
philosophy and history of logic, which I overall refer to as _Sundholm's
semantics_. In the reconstruction I propose, the latter is based on two
main tenets, namely, that we had better jettison the
object-language/meta-language distinction, and that the careful
meaning-explanation which formalisms must come with render the axioms
and rules of inference evident. The first tenet goes hand in hand with
the detection of what Sundholm call the _Bolzano reductions_, namely,
two methodological tenets according to which, first, correctness of
assertions is reduced to propositional truth and, second, inferential
validity is reduced to logical consequence. In Sundholm's opinion, these
Bolzano reductions hide crucial epistemic and pragmatic aspects of
logic, when compared to what is the case in "atavistic" approaches like
Frege's, where formalisms are indeed understood as meaningful languages.
Thus, Sundholm's semantics does not consist in a meta-linguistic
attribution of meaning to uninterpreted sets of strings, but in an
issuing of the intended meaning of contentual formalism, including
semantic values for derivations. The latter are dealt with by Sundholm
through a distinction between proof-objects and proof-acts, which
Sundholm himself had put stressed in the context of his early discussion
of BHK-semantics. When cast as a constructive reading of the so-called
truth-maker principle, via a Martin-Löfian rendering of assertions as
existence of proof(-object)s for given propositions, the
proof-object/proof-act distinction leads to a fresh semantic account of
Gentzen's 1932 and 1936 versions of Natural Deduction, as well as to
doubts regarding their often asserted meta-theoretical equivalence.
Dear all,
I would like to cordially invite you to the next APSE (Applied
Philosophy of Science and Epistemology) talk! The speaker will be
*Haiqiang Dai (Beijing Normal University in Beijing, China)* and the
talk will happen ONLINE on *June 13th, 2024 from 15:00 - 17:00*. Please
find the abstract & link below!
Please also forward this invite to others who could be interested.
Title: *Rule-Skepticism and Primitive Normativity*
Abstract:
In his Wittgenstein on Rules and Private language, Saul Kripke
established a rule-skepticism, according to which any strategy to
respond to it needs to provide facts determining that a subject is,
e.g., following the rule of addition rather than that of quaddition. In
this talk, I intend to propose a primitive-normative strategy to address
the rule-skepticism. Firstly, I will reconstruct the skeptical argument,
pointing out that the core issue is to solve the problem of
rule-deviation. Then, an account of primitive normativity is proposed,
based on the analysis of what is "seeming right" and what is "seeming
wrong", to answer the deviation problem about rules. Finally, I will
show that under my account, the primitive normativity and the public
normativity are intrinsically interrelated, which can provide the source
and foundation for the general phenomenon of normativity. This strategy
relies on the regularity and primitive-normative attitude constructed by
the subject in training, and it can satisfy both the factual and the
normative conditions as required by the Kripkean skeptics.
Theme: Rule-Skepticism and Primitive Normativity
Link:
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/69176693894?pwd=QYKntppjebxXIxI5d7UD1hm0mFNdCB.1
Code: APSE
Time: 15:00-17:00, June 13th, 2024
Best wishes,
Xinxin Gu
(via Ella Berger)
Dear all,
This is a friendly reminder for the third talk of the PACE
Metaphilosophical Talk Series by
Jennifer Nagel, University of Toronto
Title: The Concept of Knowledge in Human Conversation
Date: Tue June 11th, 2024
Time: 16:45-18:15 hrs
Location: Hörsaal 2, Hauptgebäude, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien
Please mind that this time the event will take place at the main
building of the University of Vienna.
Abstract:
Recent work in the sociology of conversation suggests that human
communicative exchanges are generally structured around epistemic
imbalances. One might wonder how empirical work on the representation of
knowledge in conversation relates to philosophical work on the nature of
knowledge itself. I argue that the best theoretical understanding of
knowledge makes sense of the relevant empirical findings. If we take
knowledge to be an essentially factive mental state, we can model
conversation as a generative adversarial structure between speaker and
addressee; this model explains why so much human conversation is
curiosity-driven, and why human beings spend so much time in
conversation with each other.
We look forward to seeing you then!
Best wishes,
The PACE organising team
https://pace.phl.univie.ac.at/
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
im Anhang schicke ich Ihnen den Aushang für die kommende FÖP der DSPL43
( Philosophie) am Mittwoch, 19.06.2024 ab 13.30. Bitte beachten Sie,
dass die FÖP dieses Semester vor Ort im Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG)
stattfindet.
--
Dear colleagues,
Please find attached the schedule for our next faculty-public
presentation (FÖP) of doctoral research projects on Wednesday, 19 June
2024 from 1.30 p.m. onwards. Please note that this semester the FÖP will
be held on site in Hörsaal 3F (3. Stock, NIG).
Mit besten Grüßen,
With best wishes,
Benjamin Schnieder, DSPL43
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
sie sind herzlich eingeladen zu unserer Veranstaltung anlässlich der Veröffentlichung von Jason Stanleys deutschsprachigem Buch "Wie Faschismus funktioniert."
DETAILS:
Buchpräsentation und Podiumsdiskussion
8 Juli 2024, 17:00 - 19:30
Central European University, Quellenstrasse 51, 1100 Wien
ÜBERLICK:
Weltweit hat faschistische Politik wieder starken Zulauf: ob in den USA, in Myanmar, in Indien oder in Europa, wo mit Spannung auf die Wahlen vom 6. bis 9. Juni geblickt wird. Jason Stanley, der an der Yale University Philosophie lehrt, identifiziert in seinem Buch "Wie Faschismus funktioniert" zehn Säulen faschistischer Politik und zeichnet ihren erschreckenden Wiederaufstieg und ihre Geschichte nach: Ob das die Mythologisierung der Vergangenheit einer Nation ist, ein gegen die Wissenschaft und Experten gerichteter Anti-Intellektualismus oder auch die Kriminalisierung von Minderheitengruppen - diese Säulen formen die Sprache und die Überzeugungen, die Menschen in ein "Wir" und ein "Sie" unterteilen.
Die faschistischen Taktiken greifen ineinander und entwickeln zusammen eine ungeheure Kraft, die letztlich eine für die Appelle einer autoritären Führung anfällige Gesellschaft formt. Stanley ist sich sicher: Nur wenn wir faschistische Politik erkennen, können wir ihren Auswirkungen widerstehen und zu demokratischen Idealen zurückkehren.
Jason Stanley wird sein Buch präsentieren. Es folgt eine Diskussion mit Historiker Timothy Snyder, die von CEUs Rektorin Shalini Randeria moderiert wird.
Anmeldung erforderlich: https://forms.office.com/e/YcxcYK3Rbc
Eintritt kostenlos!
Diese Veranstaltung ist Teil des FWF-geförderten Exzellenzclusters Knowledge in Crisis<https://www.knowledgeincrisis.com/de/uber-uns>.
Liebe Grüße
Jason Means
Jason Means, MA
Director of Management and Transfer
FWF Cluster of Excellence Knowledge in Crisis
Department of Philosophy, Central European University
Pronouns: He/Him
Tel: +43 1 25230 7538
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-d-means/>
Website<https://www.knowledgeincrisis.com/>
[cid:image001.png@01DAB822.E84B2A90]<https://www.knowledgeincrisis.com/>
[A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence]<http://www.instagram.com/knowledgecrisis> [A white x on a black background Description automatically generated] <http://www.twitter.com/knowledgecrisis> [A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence] <https://mailchi.mp/fa5ba53b06ab/kic_monthly>
Dear colleagues,
the research project "PHILOSOPHY IN THE ARTS : THE ARTS IN
PHILOSOPHY. CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HEART
IN ARTISTIC RESEARCH (AR) AND PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY (PP)* cordially
invites you to
*PHILOSOPHY GOES PUBLIC! ROTE *HERZENS*ANGELEGENHEITEN - Herzkammern
des Denkens #2*
ORT: ROTE BAR, VOLKSTHEATER WIEN
Warum haben Philosoph:innen wie Platon, Nietzsche, Aurobindo,
Ronell, Cixous und viele andere begonnen, mit künstlerischen Mitteln
zu philosophieren und performative Stile des Denkens zu entwickeln?
Warum wurden sie schließlich Künstler-Philosoph:innen – zu einem
Hybrid aus Philosoph:in und Künstler:in?
Die Antwort, die wir geben werden, ist einfach: Es war ihr *Herz*,
das sie dazu bewegte; ihr sensibilisierter Geschmack. Ihr Gemüt
verlangte danach, Begriffe mit Affekten so zu verbinden, dass sie
sich in Übereinstimmung mit den Regungen des Herzens zu einem neuen
Bild des Denkens entfalteten. Denkaffektionen // Affektionen des
Denkens // Rote Herzens:angelegenheiten.
*19. Juni 2024, 18:30-20:00 Rote Bar - Volkstheater*
Sabina Holzer, Florian Reiners, Arno Böhler, Susanne Valerie Granzer
*Anmelden unter: boehler(a)mdw.ac.at, Eintritt frei (Zählkarten)*
Organising Team: Arno Böhler, Evi Jägle, Christoph Müller*
*
*
*
*Upcoming:*
***20. Juni 2024, 18:00-20:00 *
Lecture. Michael Hagner (ETH-Zürich). /What the heart tells you
about the brain and the mind. /
Im HS 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
*24. Juni 2024, 18:30 - 20:00 *
Panel discussion. „Nietzsche’s Cardiophenomenology: Heart
matters!“ with Yunus Tuncel (New School New York), Graham Parkes
(Vienna), Arno Böhler (Vienna)
Im 3B (NIG Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien)
Am Mo., 15. Apr. 2024 um 16:22 Uhr schrieb Markus Riedl
<markus.riedl(a)univie.ac.at>:
Liebe Evi Jägerle,
habe ich soeben über hermes versendet,
beste Grüße,
Markus Riedl
Am 11.04.2024 um 15:49 schrieb Evi Jägle:
> Lieber Markus Riedl,
>
> ich würde noch einmal gerne etwas im Namen von Arno Böhler über
> den hermes Verteiler aussenden.
> So würde die Nachricht aussehen:
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
> the research project "PHILOSOPHY IN THE ARTS : THE ARTS IN
> PHILOSOPHY. CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
> HEART IN ARTISTIC RESEARCH (AR) AND PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY (PP)*
> cordially invites you to
>
> *PHILOSOPHY GOES PUBLIC! ROTE *HERZENS*ANGELEGENHEITEN -
> Herzkammern des Denkens*
> ORT: ROTE BAR, VOLKSTHEATER WIEN
>
> Warum haben Philosoph:innen wie Platon, Nietzsche, Aurobindo,
> Ronell, Cixous und viele andere begonnen, mit künstlerischen
> Mitteln zu philosophieren und performative Stile des Denkens zu
> entwickeln? Warum wurden sie schließlich Künstler-Philosoph:innen
> – zu einem Hybrid aus Philosoph:in und Künstler:in?
>
> Die Antwort, die wir geben werden, ist einfach: Es war ihr *Herz*,
> das sie dazu bewegte; ihr sensibilisierter Geschmack. Ihr Gemüt
> verlangte danach, Begriffe mit Affekten so zu verbinden, dass sie
> sich in Übereinstimmung mit den Regungen des Herzens zu einem
> neuen Bild des Denkens entfalteten. Denkaffektionen // Affektionen
> des Denkens // Rote Herzens:angelegenheiten.
>
> *17. April 2024, 18:30-20:00 Rote Bar - Volkstheater*
>
> Arno Böhler, Susanne Valerie Granzer, Johannes Kretz, Evi Jägle,
> Christoph Müller
>
>
> *Anmelden unter: boehler(a)mdw.ac.at, Eintritt frei (Zählkarten)*
>
>
>
>
> Am Di., 20. Feb. 2024 um 09:36 Uhr schrieb Markus Riedl
> <markus.riedl(a)univie.ac.at>:
>
> Liebe Evi Jägle,
>
> habe ich gerne soeben über hermes versendet,
>
> beste Grüße,
> Markus Riedl
>
> Mag. Markus Riedl
> Institutskoordinator
>
> philosophie(a)univie.ac.at
> +43(1)4277 46401
>
> Institut für Philosophie
> Universitätsstraße 7/3
> 1010 Wien
> https://philosophie.univie.ac.at/
>
> Am 19.02.2024 um 17:23 schrieb Evi Jägle:
>> Lieber Markus Riedl,
>>
>> Ich würde gerne im Namen von Arno Böhler und seinem neuen
>> Forschungsprojekt, das über das FWF Peek AR 822 gefördert
>> wird, eine Aussendung machen. Ich bin in der VdP und Teil des
>> FWF Forschungsprojekts. Dies wäre die Aussendung:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> the research project "PHILOSOPHY IN THE ARTS : THE ARTS IN
>> PHILOSOPHY. CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF
>> THE HEART IN ARTISTIC RESEARCH (AR) AND PERFORMANCE
>> PHILOSOPHY (PP)* cordially invites you to our first Yoga
>> Study Day.
>>
>> Date: February 24th, 10:00-18:00
>> Location: Kehrbach 2, 3662 Münichreith-Laimbach
>>
>> Arno Böhler will introduce you in theory and practice to the
>> philosophy of the *pulsating heart (hṛdaya)* in the context
>> of Indian philosophies (Patañjali, Abhinavagupta, Aurobindo
>> and Mirra Alfassa). A special focus will be placed on the
>> relationship between the *heart* and the consciousness of the
>> *breath* (prāṇāyāma).
>>
>> If you are interested to participate, please send an e-mail
>> toarno.boehler(a)univie.ac.at(the number of participants is
>> limited)
>>
>>
>>
>> With best regards,
>> Evi Jägle
>> PhD student (VDP)
>> Doc position
>> PEEK-Project AR 822
>> Sponsored by the Austrian Science Fund
>> (FWF) Grant-DOI: 10.55776/AR822
>>
Dear Colleagues,
I would like to bring your attention to a CfP for a conference at our
department in October:
Foucault and Marx: Ambivalences, Legacies, and Future Struggles
University of Vienna
18-19 October 2024
The international symposium "Foucault and Marx: Ambivalences, Legacies,
and Future Struggles" aims to explore the tense relationship between
Foucault and Marx and, on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of
Foucault's death in 2024, to put it into perspective with regard to
Foucault's intellectual legacy. Foucault is generally perceived as a
harsh critic of Marxism, both in terms of its analytical possibilities
and political dangers. This contrasts strongly not only with Foucault's
repeated emphasis on the centrality of Marx, but also with clear
theoretical parallels. The subject of the symposium is therefore the
question of how this ambivalence is to be understood, what it means for
possible continuations of the Foucauldian project and to what extent the
Foucault-Marx connection can be made fruitful for current and future
questions.
_Program_
Friday, 18 October
- 10:00am-04:00pm: Paper Session/CfP
- 06:00pm: Online-Keynote by Silvia Federici
Saturday, 19 October
- 10:00am-06:00pm: Keynotes and discussions by Alex Demirović, Isabelle
Garo, Isabell Lorey, Roberto Nigro, Johanna Oksala (on site)
_Call for Papers_
Abstract (300-500 words) + short bio (150 words) in 1 PDF document
Send to: foucaultmarx40.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at
Deadline: 30.06.2024
You can expect our response until the end of July.
More info: https://foucaultmarx40.univie.ac.at/ [1]
The organizing team
Eva-Maria Aigner
Ralf Gisinger
Christoph Hubatschke
Eva Jägle
Jonas Oßwald
Links:
------
[1]
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffoucault…
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren!
Immanuel Kant gilt als einer der bedeutendsten Philosophen der
Aufklärung. Er rief den Menschen zu „Sapere aude!“ – trau Dich, selbst
zu denken, anstatt andere für Dich denken zu lassen. Der Mut zum
Selbstdenken wurde zum Kennzeichen der Aufklärung und der Wissenschaft.
Heute diskutieren wir, ob Anwendungen der Künstlichen Intelligenz (KI),
uns im Beruf und Alltag vom mühsamen Selberdenken befreien können. Was
würde Immanuel Kant zu KI sagen? Würde er uns zur digitalen Mündigkeit
aufrufen?
Diskutieren Sie diese und andere Fragen am 10. Juni, 17:00 bis 18:15
Uhr, mit Prof. Armin Grunwald, der uns Überlegungen dazu aus der
Forschung der Technikethik und Technikphilosophie präsentieren wird.
*Anmeldung*: „Entdecken Sie… Kant und KI
<https://ticket.wien.gv.at/MDS/kantundki/>“
*Lebenslauf Prof. Armin Grunwald *
Armin Grunwald, Prof. Dr., Studium von Physik, Mathematik und
Philosophie. Seit 1999 Leiter des Instituts für Technikfolgenabschätzung
und Systemanalyse (ITAS) am Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT).
Seit 2002 auch Leiter des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim
Deutschen Bundestag (TAB). Seit 2007 auch Professor für
Technikphilosophie am KIT. Mitglied der Deutschen Akademie der
Technikwissenschaften (acatech) seit 2009, Mitglied im Präsidium von
acatech seit 2014. Mitglied der Endlagerkommission des Deutschen
Bundestages 2014-2016. Mitglied in der Ethik-Kommission für autonomes
und vernetztes Fahren des Bundesverkehrsministeriums 2016/2017.
Ko-Vorsitzender des Nationalen Begleitgremiums Endlagersuche seit 2020.
Mitglied des Deutschen Ethikrates seit 2021.
Das Webinar wird von Seiten der Stadt Wien, Magistratsdirektion – Büro
des Magistratsdirektors, Bereichsleitung für Wissenschaft, Forschung und
Wirtschaftsstandort organisiert.
Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Anmeldung!