Dear Colleagues,
This is an email to remind you that the next presentations in the
Work-In-Progress series will be given by Kanau Kobayashi and Ali Emre
Benli this coming Thursday. Please see their titles below and the
abstracts attached.
"'Im Namen von ...' Über die Gründungsdimension des Rechts mit Blick auf
die Subjektkonstitution. Psychoanalyse und Recht in Pierre Legendres
politischer Philosophie" by Kanau Kobayashi
"How democratic should democracy seeking agents be in electoral
authoritarian regimes?" by Ali Emre Benli
The meeting will take place in lecture hall 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße
7, 3rd floor) at 17:00 and will last up to 18:30. All are invited to
join us for dinner or drinks afterwards. If possible, please let us know
in advance by email.
You can write to wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at if you have any questions
or would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series. Calendar and
event information can be found at:
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team
(Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian Fleisch, Mark Basafa,
Sophie Veigl, Raphael Aybar, Nianzu Tu)
--
Adrian Fleisch, BA
er, he/him
SSC Philosophie
Universitätsstraße 7 (NIG), B 0304
+43-1-4277-46181
adrian.fleisch(a)univie.ac.at
—
www.khora.philo.at
Dear colleagues,
When? Tuesday, May 28 | 16:00 hours
Where? Café Museum, Operngasse 7, 1010 Vienna
*“Artificial Intelligence & Artificial Ignorance”*
The conversation with Georg Gottlob will explore Artificial
Intelligence's current state and challenges. It will also provide
insights into the two main branches of AI research, symbolic AI and
sub-symbolic AI, highlighting their achievements and limitations. The
conversation will also delve into the recent advancements in generative
AI, such as ChatGPT, and examine instances where these models excel and
where they fall short.
The discussion will again be moderated by journalist Sarah Kriesche.
Admission-free, no registration or expertise required; this is an event
for the general public. You are welcome to forward this invitation to
anyone who might be interested in the talk! We look forward to seeing
you there.
https://www.vcla.at/2024/05/logiclounge-2024-with-georg-gottlob/
If you would like to share this information via social media, you can
find us on facebook and twitter: @vclaTUwien.
Thanks in advance & best wishes
*Andrea Hackl, MA*
Project Manager
Vienna Center for Logic and Algorithms
*Technische Universität Wien*
Favoritenstraße 9-11, Stiege 3, 3. Stock, 1040 Wien
andrea.hackl(a)tuwien.ac.at <mailto:andrea.hackl@tuwien.ac.at>
www.vcla.at <http://www.vcla.at>
Dear all,
this is a reminder for the Trans*formations talk by Dr. Alyosxa Tudor
(SOAS London) which will take place tomorrow :)
Title: Decolonising Trans/Gender Studies?
Abstract:
In this talk, I would like to discuss with you what it means to think of
trans/gender studies as a field that engages with geopolitics, with
transnational knowledge production, with histories of entangled
oppressions and resistance movements. With this I try to go beyond what
our attackers think trans/gender studies is towards defining what the
broader field of trans/gender studies can be. Can it be a field of
knowledge generation that aims for decolonisation? How can we make sure
that decolonisation is not a metaphor, as Eve Tuck and Wayne Yang remind
us? How can we mobilise histories and the theories and epistemologies
generated from them in ways that are not reductive, simplistic and
incapable of sitting with the complex contradictions that still need
responsible and decisive actions in face of present-day injustices? How
can we be accountable for our very different structural positions in
this quest, in terms of location, postcolonial position, migratisation,
queer- and transness, class and racialisation? Often this is
contradictory and painful. But it must also be clear that taking a
stance is necessary.
When/Where: 16.5.2024, HS 3A, Neues Institutsgebäude (Universitätsstraße
7, 1010 Wien)
Thanks to the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy and the Institute of
Philosophy for co-financing this talk series!
Looking forward to seeing many of you there!
All the best,
Flora Löffelmann
P.S.: Please also invite others that could be interested, you find the
poster attached!
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Werte Studentinnen und Studenten, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen,
wir heißen Euch in diesem Semester wieder herzlich willkommen zum
Lesekreis zu Aristoteles´ De Anima III. Wir werden uns jeden Dienstag um
18:30-20:00 im Hörsaal 3A treffen und gemeinsam die Textstelle lesen und
diskutieren. Jeder von Euch ist eingeladen, teilzunehmen und mitzumachen.
Wir freuen uns sehr auf Euer Kommen!
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Daniel Koenig, who will give a talk on
May 23, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium TALK: Daniel Koenig
MATHEMATICS AS FORM OF KNOWLEDGE IN ERNST CASSIRER'S PHILOSOPHY OF
CULTURE
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 23/05/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
Both Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of mathematics and his philosophy of
culture received more and more attention recently. Nevertheless, there
is scarcely work on the relationship between the two and in my talk I
want to show, that considering both sheds new light on Cassirer's
conception of mathematics and, furthermore, his overall philosophy. In a
first part I will show, that in Cassirer's interpretation, the concept
of number plays a central role in determining mathematics and the
natural sciences: Mathematics is here a form of theoretical knowledge.
In a second part, I will broaden the perspective and consider Cassirer's
reflections on nonscientific conceptions of number and show, that for
Cassirer there is a double function of number. The talk will close with
another expansion of perspective: I will elaborate how mathematics can
further be understood as a form of meta-symbolic knowledge, and hereby
give a characterization of Cassirer's conception of philosophy.
Dear all,
I want to share this invitation to an event at mdw with you all!
Event: Pre-opening: International Research Center Gender and
Performativity
Speaker: Jack Halberstam
Title: Unworlding: Trans* Architectures
When/where: Thursday, May 16th, 5pm at Großer Seminarraum (E0101), IKM /
Anton-von-Webern-Platz 1, 1030 Wien
Abstract:
Today, I am going to lay out some ideas that build on many different
aesthetic performances and practices involving trans bodies and that
search for and produce new vocabularies for discussing transness and new
deployments of transness for the project of dismantling world and
worldedness as concepts that hold current political realities in place.
I will look at trans anarchitectures alongside performances like Faye
Driscoll’s incredible event, “Weathering,” to delineate what is meant by
unworlding, what practices and aesthetic gestures it implies and what
im/possible futures it imagines. Unworlding is a philosophy and an
anti-anti-utopian idea that breaks with world-building projects (such as
those found in early queer theory), and charts a course for queer and
trans art that skews towards violence, acts of undoing and dismantling
and the embrace of entropic unraveling. What might this look like in
terms of a politics of representation, particularly one oriented around
trans and queer bodies?
Biography:
Jack Halberstam is the David Feinson Professor of The Humanities at
Columbia University. Halberstam is the author of seven books including:
Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters (Duke UP,
1995), Female Masculinity (Duke UP, 1998), In A Queer Time and Place
(NYU Press, 2005), The Queer Art of Failure (Duke UP, 2011), Gaga
Feminism: Sex, Gender, and the End of Normal (Beacon Press, 2012) and, a
short book titled Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variance
(University of California Press). Halberstam’s latest book, 2020 from
Duke UP is titled Wild Things: The Disorder of Desire. Places Journal
awarded Halberstam its Arcus/Places Prize in 2018 for innovative public
scholarship on the relationship between gender, sexuality and the built
environment. Halberstam is now finishing a second volume on wildness
titled: Unworlding: An Aesthetics of Collapse. Halberstam was recently
the subject of a short film titled “So We Moved” by Adam Pendleton.
Halberstam was recently named a 2024 Guggenheim Fellow.
Find more Info here:
https://www.mdw.ac.at/ikm/gender-studies/?PageId=4770
All the best,
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
Ich darf ganz herzlich zum Nächsten Khora-Kolloquium diesen Donnerstag,
den 16.05. um 18:30 im Hörsaal 3D einladen. Dieses Mal wird uns mit
Maximilian Margreiter ein ausgewiesener Bataille-Experte das Verhältnis
von Poesie und dem Begriff des Unmöglichen bei Bataille vorstellen:
*Immanenz, Kommunikation und der Hass der Poesie. Batailles Denken
des Unmöglichen zwischen Literatur, Ökonomie und Erotik*
Georges Batailles vielschichtiges und disparat wirkendes Werk kreist
um ein zentrales Problem: Das Denken, und noch wichtiger, die
Kommunikation des Unmöglichen. Dieses Unmögliche ist es, was uns
nach Bataille als menschliche Wesen ausmacht und uns eine souveräne
Existenz verleiht. Wir werden dem Unmöglichen unter anderem in den
antiökonomischen Formen des Opfers, des Festes, der Verschwendung
gewahr, welche sich dem Primat der Nützlichkeit entziehen, in der
erotischen Ekstase, die eine Bejahung des Lebens bis in den Tod
darstellt, und in der Literatur, insbesondere der Poesie, die die
Kommunikation schlechthin ist. Im Unmöglichen findet sich nach
Bataille das Subjekt wieder, als das, was es wirklich ist, als Riss,
an dem eine intensive Kommunikation stattfindet, die in die Immanenz
verweist. 1962, kurz vor seinem Tod, gibt Bataille seine
Erzählung Der Hass der Poesie, versehen mit einem neuen Vorwort
unter dem Titel Das Unmöglicheneu heraus. Diese Verbindung zwischen
dem Unmöglichen und der Literatur, speziell in der Form der Poesie,
die Bataille so an seinem Lebensende nochmals betont hat, eröffnet
einen Zugang zu einem sonst oft kryptisch und unstrukturiert
anmutenden Werk.
Wie immer werden wir danach im Gagarin reservieren. Wir freuen uns auf
euer Kommen.
Bitte schreibt an mich oder an khoraplattform(a)gmail.com, wenn Ihr die
behandelten kurzen Textpassagen zugesendet bekommen möchtet.
Liebe Grüße
Adrian Fleisch
Phänomenologische Forschungen - 16. Mai 2024 - Ruud Welten: Levinas and
Lacan: Reflections on Language and Psychosis
Liebe Kolleg_innen,
wir möchten Sie herzlich zur nächsten Veranstaltung der Vortragsreihe
„Phänomenologische Forschungen“ einladen:
16.05.2024, 18.30–20.00 Uhr, Hörsaal 2H (Vortrag)
//Ruud Welten (Erasmus University Rotterdam):
"Levinas and Lacan: Reflections on Language and Psychosis"
Mit besten Grüßen,
Michael Staudigl, Gerhard Unterthurner
https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…
<https://phaenomenologie.univie.ac.at/forschung/vorlesungsreihe-phaenomenolo…>
Dear All,
The "Wittgen=steine" series (organized by the Wittgenstein Research
Group) features two talks this term:
April 12th, 2024; 3:00pm to 4:30pm, HS 3A:
Pavel Arazim: "Therapie(n) als Methode(n) -- warum und wie? Vergleich
der Antiphilosophie Wittgensteins und Bergsons"
May 14th, 2024: 3:00pm to 4:30pm, HS 3A:
Anna Boncompagni: "Once more with feeling" A feminist-Wittgensteinian
take on language and liberation"
Abstracts:
Pavel Arazim: "Therapie(n) als Methode(n) - warum und wie?"
Wittgenstein wurde bereits mit vielen Autor:innen verglichen, kaum aber
mit Bergson. Dabei war er wohl der populärste Philosoph unmittelbar
bevor Wittgenstein bekannt wurde. Schon deshalb liegt es nahe, die
Möglichkeit eines Einflusses zu untersuchen. Darüber hinaus wurden beide
Autoren von William James inspiriert und entwickeln seinen Ansatz
weiter, philosophische Probleme eher aufzulösen, statt sie zu lösen.
Folgende Fragen sollen im Vortrag behandelt werden: Was bedeutet es für
Bergson und Wittgenstein, dass eine philosophische Frage verschwinden
soll? Inwiefern lässt sich dieser Zugang als allgemeine Auffassung der
Philosophie verteidigen? Soll also Philosophie keine Thesen aufstellen
und mit welcher Begründung? Womöglich hilft Bergsons Zugang zu Bewegung
und Veränderung zum besseren Verständnis dessen, was Wittgenstein zu
dieser Methodologie führen konnte. Die Wirklichkeit ist lebendig und
dynamisch, und deswegen kann sie nicht mittels verallgemeinernder
Begriffe ausgedrückt werden. Mein Anliegen besteht darin aufzuzeigen,
wie sich dieser therapeutische und anti-theoretische Zugang im
Verständnis der Normativität bei beiden Autoren widerspiegelt.
Anna Boncompagni: "Once more with feeling ..."
Recent work in feminist epistemology and philosophy of language
highlights how language use contributes to oppressive practices. For
instance, Tirrell (2012), building on Wilfrid Sellars and Robert
Brandom, analyzes the normative power of derogatory terms and how they
engender harmful actions and behaviors. McGowan (2019), developing David
Lewis' approach, claims that conversational contributions enact norms
and permissibility facts both within the conversation and in social
practices, thereby constituting harms and keeping oppressive practices
in place. Both perspectives are indebted to the Wittgensteinian notion
of language games. In this paper, I retrace this inheritance and further
argue for a Wittgensteinian understanding of these phenomena, also
appealing to his concepts of rule-following and forms of life. However,
rather than oppression, I apply these insights to liberation: I claim
that certain moves in language games enact positive changes in social
norms and forms of life. In particular, I apply this approach to
linguistic moves related to LGBTQ issues. This Wittgensteinian-feminist
framework, I argue, helps better understand both the difficulties and
the potentialities of liberatory and innovative conversational moves.
Everybody welcome!
Best wishes from the organizers,
Esther Heinrich
Anja Weiberg
Martin Kusch
Dear all,
I want to cordially invite you to the second installment of the
Trans*formations talk series!
Trans* Philosophy is one of the most exciting 'new' strands of
philosophical theorizing, and we are happy to host the second event on
the topic at the Department of Philosophy, to be followed by more later
this year.
This time, we will be joined by Alyosxa Tudor, Chair of the Centre for
Gender Studies at SOAS London. Their work connects trans and queer
feminist approaches with transnational feminism and postcolonial
studies. Alyosxa’s main research interest lies in analysing (knowledge
productions on) migrations, diasporas and borders in relation to
critiques of Eurocentrism and to processes of gendering and
racialisation.
Title: Decolonising Trans/Gender Studies?
Abstract:
In this talk, I would like to discuss with you what it means to think of
trans/gender studies as a field that engages with geopolitics, with
transnational knowledge production, with histories of entangled
oppressions and resistance movements. With this I try to go beyond what
our attackers think trans/gender studies is towards defining what the
broader field of trans/gender studies can be. Can it be a field of
knowledge generation that aims for decolonisation? How can we make sure
that decolonisation is not a metaphor, as Eve Tuck and Wayne Yang remind
us? How can we mobilise histories and the theories and epistemologies
generated from them in ways that are not reductive, simplistic and
incapable of sitting with the complex contradictions that still need
responsible and decisive actions in face of present-day injustices? How
can we be accountable for our very different structural positions in
this quest, in terms of location, postcolonial position, migratisation,
queer- and transness, class and racialisation? Often this is
contradictory and painful. But it must also be clear that taking a
stance is necessary.
When/Where: 16.5.2024, HS 3A, Neues Institutsgebäude (Universitätsstraße
7, 1010 Wien)
Thanks to the Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy and the Institute of
Philosophy for co-financing this talk series!
Looking forward to seeing many of you there!
All the best,
Flora Löffelmann
P.S.: Please also invite others that could be interested, you find the
poster attached!
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!