Dear Colleagues,
We are happy to invite you to the next session of the Work-In-Progress
series in a week, on Thursday 2nd May. There will be two presentations,
given by Mariia Fedorova and Zachary Daus. Detailed information is
below:
When & Where: Thursday, May 2, 17:15 - 18:45, Hörsaal 3A (NIG,
Universitätsstraße 7)
1st Presentation: Speaker: Mariia Fedorova.
Title: On Virtues and Vices of Imaginative Constraints
Abstract:
Several philosophers have recently argued that imagination can be
epistemically useful when it is properly constrained by reality.
Nevertheless, the nature of the so-called imaginative constraints has
remained a contentious matter. On the one hand, it is believed that
imagination is constrained by one’s beliefs about the world which are
readily accessible to introspection and available for voluntary control.
I refer to this view as the voluntary-imaginative-constraints view
(VIC). On the other hand, given the shared cognitive architecture of
perception and imagination, imaginative constraints are stipulated to
take the form of perceptual regularities, inaccessible to consciousness
and, by extension, out of voluntary control. Call this view the
architectural-imaginative-constraints view (AIC). Prima facie, VIC and
AIC are compatible. It seems plausible to suppose that imagination can
be constrained by one’s beliefs about the world as well as by perceptual
regularities. Under closer examination, however, the advocates of VIC
and AIC appear to talk about one and the same kind of imaginative
constraints - the imaginer’s background knowledge of her environment.
The key difference between VIC and AIC lies in the relationship they
take to obtain between the imaginer and her knowledge. This puts
pressure on the apparent compatibility of VIC and AIC and challenges us
to make a choice between treating the imaginer’s knowledge as (i)
consciously accessible and controlled or as (ii) inaccessible to
consciousness and out of voluntary control. If we favour (i),
imagination’s reliability is in jeopardy. If we favour (ii), its
epistemic value is compromised. Fortunately, a dual-system model of
imagination as proposed by Michael Stuart offers a way out of this
dilemma. Instead of distinguishing different types of imaginative
constraints, we can distinguish different ways of exercising
imagination, one of which is consciously accessible and controlled,
while the other is unconscious and automatic.
2nd Presentation: Speaker: Zachary Daus.
Title: Distribution, Recognition and the Politics
of Justice in Medical AI.
Abstract:
Advocates of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine suggest that one
of its greatest benefits is its ability to resolve issues in the
distribution of scarce medical resources. While there is real potential
for medical AI to alleviate medical resource scarcity and consequently
contribute to a more just distribution of medical resources, this would
come at a cost to justice as recognition. A biased clinical decision
support system (CDSS), for example, may result in more distributively
just outcomes by expanding access to medical care, but at a cost to the
mis-recognition of minorities and women. Should such a CDSS be tolerated
for its improvement in distribution at its cost to recognition?
Similarly a black box CDSS, for example, may arrive at decisions that
are incapable of meaningful explanations despite expanding access to
medical care. Must such systems incur the cost of being engineered for
explainability in order to ensure that they do not mis-recognize humans
qua rational agents? In light of these and similar issues, I argue that
one of the predominant theories of justice that guides the distribution
of medical resources—Norman Daniels's Rawls-inspired accountability for
reasonableness (AFR)—must be either supplemented or replaced by a theory
of justice as recognition, and consider the theories of recognition
developed by Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth as potential candidates.
There are refreshments and snacks. And all are invited to join for
dinner or drinks afterward.
Please let us know (wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at) if you have any
questions or if you would like to present for the Work-in-Progress
series yourself. You can find calendar and event information
at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/.
Best wishes and we hope to see you there!
The organizing team
Dear all,
we cordially invite you to the upcoming talk of the APSE - lecture
series, delivered by Stephanie Ifill (University of Westminster)
Title: Knowledge as a turn towards the possibility of existence
When/Where: 12.10., 15-17pm, HS 3A
If you are interested in joining us for dinner/drinks afterwards, write
an email to Manu Sharma (manu.sharma(a)univie.ac.at)! everyone welcome!
Abstract:
"I came to realise that to produce knowledge, I must enter into a
framework where I am non-existent....I refused...There must be another
possibility, another way of knowing." This talk brings forward the
question: what is the possibility of epistemic non-existence? One of the
possibilities I raise is that of the turn. The turn is not a seek of
inclusion in; it's a turn, a break from. I turn in relation to Sylvia
Wynter (to rupture) and Henri Bergson (to indetermination) to help
articulate what I mean by epistemic turn. Upon awareness, there is the
possibility to turn from, indeed with a cost, but a possibility none the
less. This talk represents the culmination of deep thought brought out
through relational conversations and a direct lived confrontation with
epistemic non-existence; it's part of an ongoing experiment in the
possibility of appearing in Europe as a *Black woman (outside of the
cage).
Kind regards,
Sophie Veigl on behalf of the APSE-Unit
--
Dr. Sophie Juliane Veigl, BSc., BA., MSc., MA.
Institut für Philosophie, Universität Wien
E-Mail: sophie.juliane.veigl(a)univie.ac.at
my pronouns are she/her
Summer School
Call for Applications
(Deadline: April 1, 2024 extended: April 30, 2024)
22nd univie: summer school Scientific World Conceptions (USS-SWC)
EuropEAN SUMMER SCHOOL on the philosophy of mathematics
in cooperation with
EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS (ESPM)
<https://philmath.eu/> https://philmath.eu/
Vienna, September 9-13, 2024
The second European Summer School on the Philosophy of Mathematics will
focus on different topics in the philosophy of mathematics, its foundations,
as well as on the philosophy of mathematical practice. We are happy to
invite abstract submissions by graduate students (MA and PhD). The School
will be hosted in person at the University of Vienna and will include three
tutorials by distinguished scholars as well as a training unit on
"Quantitative and qualitative empirical methods for philosophers of
mathematics" by Matthew Inglis and Deborah Kant (provided by the CIPSH Chair
DMRCP ("Diversity of Mathematical Research Cultures and Practices").
The school aims to bring together Master and PhD students interested in the
connection between philosophy and mathematics, giving them the opportunity
to discuss related topics with leading scholars in the field.
Topics will be selected reflecting participants interests and may include:
* Mathematical knowledge and mathematical understanding
* Justification and representation in mathematics
* Informal proofs and mathematical rigor
* The role of intuition and diagrams in mathematical reasoning
* Experimental mathematics and mathematical practice
* Mathematical ontology
Lecturers:
Jessica Carter (Aarhus University)
<https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177
bcfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html>
https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/jessica-maria-helena-grund-carter(5177b
cfe-0a52-4da9-aa71-e06fa0a3d5a6).html
Yacin Hamami (ETH Zurich)
<https://www.yacinhamami.com> https://www.yacinhamami.com
Leon Horsten (University of Konstanz)
<https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/>
https://www.philosophie.uni-konstanz.de/en/ag-leon-horsten/leon-horsten/
The program is primarily directed at graduate students and junior
researchers in relevant fields, but the organizers also encourage
applications from people in all stages of their career.
Application form and further information:
<https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/>
https://summerschool-ivc.univie.ac.at/application/
USS-SWC operates under the academic supervision of an International Program
Committee of distinguished philosophers, historians, and scientists. Its
members represent the scientific fields in the scope of USS-SWC, make
contact to their home universities and will also support acknowledgement of
courses taken by the students. The annual summer school is organised by the
Institute Vienna Circle of the University of Vienna.
<https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/> https://wienerkreis.univie.ac.at/en/
Find information about our exchange programme with Duke University (North
Carolina) here:
<https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-
wide-partnership-agreements/north-america/>
https://international.univie.ac.at/en/international-cooperation/university-w
ide-partnership-agreements/north-america/
Inquiries:
Administrator:
Zarah Weiss
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:summerschool.ivc@univie.ac.at> summerschool.ivc(a)univie.ac.at
Scientific director:
Georg Schiemer
Institute Vienna Circle
Alserstraße 23/32
1080 Wien
<mailto:georg.schiemer@univie.ac.at> georg.schiemer(a)univie.ac.at
Dear all,
our next speaker in the Philosophy of Science Colloquium organized by
the Institute Vienna Circle is Jesús Zamora Bonilla, who will give a
talk on April 25, 4.45-6.15 pm.
All are welcome!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM TALK: JESÚS ZAMORA BONILLA
ON OBSERVATIONAL STATEMENTS AS EPISTEMIC PUBLIC GOODS: AN INFERENTIALIST
RECONSTRUCTION OF NEURATH'S PROTOKOLLSÄTZE
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
The Institute Vienna Circle holds a Philosophy of Science Colloquium
with talks by our present fellows.
Date: 25/04/2024
Time: 16h45
Venue: New Institute Building (NIG), Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, HS
3F
ABSTRACT:
Philosophical discussions have tended to concentrate much more on how
observational statements are 'theory laden' than on what is what makes
them observational to begin with. After discrediting the notion of a
'purely observational language' or the existence of 'pure sense data',
consensus has apparently been that it is a concern for the practicing
scientists themselves to determine by acquaintance or familiarity what
counts in each case as an 'observation', without the possibility of
having something like a 'general philosophical theory of scientific
observation'. Without denying the role of contextual and tacit knowledge
in the process of determining what can be taken as an observational
statement, this talk tries to recover Otto Neurath's idea of
Protokolsätze by immersing it in an inferentialist account of scientific
activity (or 'science as a game of persuasion') and by employing some
concepts derived from economics and game theory, in particular Milgrom's
notion of 'public events' as a possible solution of the problem of
common knowledge in games of coordination. Further consequences are
derived in regard of the relation between private and public knowledge,
and about the revisability of observational information.
Dear all,
this is just a reminder that tomorrow is UVienna's Work-In-Progress Series with Jesús Zamora Bonilla (Visiting Scholar from UNED).
When? Thursday, April 18, 17:00 - 18:30
Where? Hörsaal 3A (NIG, Universitätsstraße 7)
Title: "Reflections on the ontology of social problems"
Abstract:
The aim of this talk is to explore the entangledness of social problems with both the positive and normative aspects of social reality and social ideas, and connect it with a variety of debates within the social ontology literature. Despite the broad scope of this field, 'social problems' are conspicuously missing as an independent category. This omission is intriguing since many of the listed topics (like Group Agency, Organizations, Money, Race, Gender, and Disability, etc.) are inherently linked to various kinds of social problems. This dearth of attention to social problems is also reflected in academic databases like The Philosopher's Index, which yield zero results when searching for "ontology" and "social problem" together. The neglect of social problems within the academic field of social ontology is not due to a lack of significance attached to them by social scientists themselves: disciplines like economics and sociology recognize the centrality of social problems and have dedicated a lot of work to their study. Some arguments in favour of the centrality of social problems are the following: first, in many philosophical theories, from pragmatism to existentialism, ‘reality’ is not merely a question of, say, ‘brute existence’, but something that emerges in front of humans as a kind of resistance (or, as Heidegger would have put it, as a kind of Unzuhandenheit). In this sense, problems would probably be the ‘most real’ things for humans (and perhaps for living beings in general), and social problems would count amongst the ‘hardest’ social facts we can encounter as inhabitants of the social world. Second, something similar happens at the level of the social sciences, whose main direct motivation is very likely the attempt of understanding the social world in order to help to solve some of the problems that afflict the members of the societies to which social scientists themselves belong. These arguments point to the conclusion that the most reasonable approaches to the ontology of social problems will have to pay considerable attention to items and ideas coming from phenomenology.
Everyone is most cordially invited to join us for dinner or drinks afterward. If possible, please let us know in advance by email.
You can write to wip.philosophie(a)univie.ac.at <mailto:wip.philosophie@univie.ac.at> if you have any questions or would like to present for the Work-in-Progress series. Calendar and event information can be found at: https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/phd-program/doctoral-training/wip-series/
Best wishes and we hope to see many of you there!
The Organizing Team
(Chiara Dankl, Martin Niederl, Yi-Jie Xia, Adrian Fleisch, Mark Basafa, Sophie Veigl, Raphael Aybar, Nianzu Tu)
Dear all,
The Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy invites you to the next
Pragmatic Academic event on
"Academic Publishing in Philosophy Journals", which will take place on
Friday, April 19th, from 14:00 to 16:00 in room 2G, NiG.
This time, Prof. Benjamin Schnieder, Prof. Paulina Sliwa and Dr. Sophie
Veigl will share their insider experiences and answer questions such as
Should I publish research articles as a PhD student?
Where should I publish?
What happens when I submit a manuscript to a journal?
Participants can send their questions in advance to
vd.philosophy(a)univie.ac.at.
The full event description is available at
https://vd-philosophy.univie.ac.at/events/details/news/academic-publishing-…
We look forward to seeing you there. Please feel free to share this
invitation with others who may be interested.
Raphael Aybar
Liebe Kolleg*innen,
wir laden Sie herzlich zum Gastvortrag von Prof. Jörg Robert (Tübingen)
anlässlich des 300. Geburtstages von Immanuel Kant ein:
„FREIHEIT DER KUNST? – KANT UND DIE ERFINDUNG DER ÄSTHETISCHEN AUTONOMIE“
18. April, 19:00 – 20:30
Marietta-Blau-Saal, Universität Wien
Weitere Infos unter:
https://neugermanistik-wien.at/event/freiheit-der-kunst-kant-und-die-erfind…
Eine Anmeldung ist nicht erforderlich.
Wir freuen uns auf Ihr Kommen!
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
Lydia Rammerstorfer
--
Univ.- Ass. Mag. Lydia Rammerstorfer
Institut für Germanistik
Universität Wien
Universitätsring 1
1010 Wien
Zimmer: ZG 102.33
Tel.: +43-1-4277-42285
lydia.rammerstorfer(a)univie.ac.at
rammersl(a)hu-berlin.de
Dear friends of the ISTB,
we cordially invite you to a public lecture in two parts, organized by
ISTB + IKGA:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Diwakar Acharya (University of Oxford): "Hidden in Plain Sight:
Identification and Analysis of Some Early Sāṃkhya and Yoga Texts"
*
Part I: Monday, April 22, 2024, 17:30, in seminar room 1 of the ISTB
(University Campus, Spitalgasse 2, Hof 2.7, 1090 Vienna) (iCal
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_istb/NE_Vortraege/ICS/2024…>)
Part II: Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 17:00, Room 5, Austrian Academy of
Sciences, 4th floor, Georg-Coch-Platz 2, 1010 Vienna
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information on the talk and the speaker can be found in this PDF
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_istb/NE_Vortraege/PDF/2024…>
or on our website
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/hidden-in-plain-sight-iden…>.
After the lecture, we invite you to a small reception.
We are looking forward to seeing you there,
best regards, Judith Starecek
--
Institut für Südasien-, Tibet- und Buddhismuskunde
Universität Wien
Spitalgasse 2, Hof 2.1
1090 Wien
-----------
T: +43-1-4277-43502
stb.univie.ac.at
Save the dates of our other oncoming lectures, too
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/en/news-events/detail/news/istb-event-programme/>!
April 25, 2024, 17:30
Public lecture:
Nathan Hill, “The 23rd letter of the Tibetan alphabet: the controversy
continues”
May 22-23, 2024
Seminar & public lecture:
Naomi Appleton, on the /Viśvantarajātaka/
June 6, 2024, 17:30
Public lecture:
Peter Szánto, “Re-editing the /Suhṛllekha/, attributed to Nāgārjuna”
June 13-15, 2024
Workshop:
“Sounds, Literature and Images: Indian Experience in the First World War“
July 5-6, 2024
Workshop:
"Monasticism and Religious Identities in Tibet: Yogic Cultures and Study
Curricula in 15th Century Tibet"
July 8-13,2024
Sanskrit Summer Academy:
"Philosophical Perspectives on Language in premodern South Asia"
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/philosophical-perspectives…>
Registration is open until May 31st!
<https://stb.univie.ac.at/news-events/detail/news/philosophical-perspectives…>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't want to receive our emails any longer? - Unsubscribe from this
list <https://stb.univie.ac.at/en/news-events/newsletter-unsubscribe/>
Dear all,
I am happy to invite you all to the next APSE (Applied Philosophy of
Science and Epistemology) talk!
When: Thursday, 11.4.2024, 15:00 - 17:00
Where: ONLINE -> Zoom Link:
https://univienna.zoom.us/j/66424108457?pwd=d1VwcVR1M1BBVXVpbHM3ejFKNDNOZz09
We are excited to welcome as our next speaker Dr. Paul Giladi, Lecturer
in Philosophy at the School of History, Religions, and Philosophies,
SOAS University of London.
He will give a talk titled "Putnam on ‘The Last Dogma of Empiricism’:
From Auto da Fé to Epistemic Disobedience?"
Here is the abstract:
In this chapter, I argue that the principal philosophic depth of Hilary
Putnam’s dissolution of the fact/value dichotomy (FVD) is neither
sourced in his argument that theory selection always presupposes values,
nor in his argument that there is entanglement of fact and value in our
use of thick ethical concepts. Rather, the principal philosophic depth
mainly resides in Putnam’s charge that mainstream analytic philosophical
circles often fetishize (scientific) naturalism. Putnam’s
anti-scientism, more so than either of his entanglement theses, provides
his readers with reason to regard FVD as a type of ideology. Because of
its status as an ideology, and as therefore in the business of hegemonic
sense-making, FVD is made sense of as a real threat to inquiry, insofar
as FVD renders inquiry undemocratic by valorizing simplicity over
complexity, cleanliness over messiness, dry deserts over lush
landscapes. Putnam’s own ‘post-analytic’ pragmatist position never
ostensibly espoused any
critical theoretic attitude toward modernity – let alone formulated
Ideologiekritik. Nevertheless, I think his 21st-century articulations of
his conceptual pluralism may be said to display more resonance with the
decolonial concept of epistemic disobedience than with a ‘post-analytic’
tradition Putnam himself explicitly endorsed in
his final decade: liberal naturalism. I conclude that even though
Putnam’s anti-scientistic defence of mathematically recalcitrant
phenomena may be more radical than liberal naturalist defences of such
phenomena, Putnam should be viewed as ultimately more epistemically
mischievous than epistemically disobedient.
Looking forward to seeing you all at the talk!
Best,
Flora Löffelmann on behalf of the APSE team
--
Flora Löffelmann, MA MA
University assistant & doctoral candidate
Department of Philosophy at University of Vienna
Pronouns: they/them (for more info see:
https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why/)
Happy about a gender neutral "hello"!
Liebe Kolleg:innen,
Am Sonntag, den 14. April wird um 11 Uhr im Museum für angewandte Kunst
in Wien der Günther-Anders-Preis für kritisches Denken an den
Schriftsteller und Philosophen Guillaume Paoli verliehen.
Die Veranstaltung ist öffentlich und Sie sind herzlich willkommen! Wenn
Sie kommen möchten, bitten wir Sie um eine Anmeldung per E-Mail an
gap(a)chbeck-kulturstiftung.de
Das Programm:
Begrüßung von Christian Dries, Obmann der
Anders-Gesellschaft/Vorsitzender der Preis-Jury
Laudatio von Karin Harrasser, Direktorin (interimistisch) des ifk, Wien
Überreichung der Preisurkunde von Wolfgang Beck
Dankesrede von Guillaume Paoli
Lesung von Michael Maertens aus Texten von Günther Anders
Anschließend Gespräch zwischen dem Preisträger, Karin Harrasser und
Stephan Lessenich
Kleiner Empfang
Zum Preisträger:
GUILLAUME PAOLI wird für seine Sammlung funkelnder Notate „Geist und
Müll. Von Denkweisen in postnormalen Zeiten" mit dem Günther
Anders-Preis für kritisches Denken ausgezeichnet. Unter „Geist" versteht
der in Frankreich geborene und in Berlin lebende Schriftsteller und
Philosoph eine „Transformationskraft", die mit vollem Einsatz für eine
„Politik emanzipatorischer Konservierung" wirbt, um die Welt in
bewohnbarem Zustand zu erhalten. Die vom Autor geforderte „Wissenschaft
vom Management und der Beseitigung von Müll" schließt eine
Müllsortierung des Geistes mit ein, denn „Müll entsteht im Kopf". Paolis
kritisches Denken gipfelt in der Antinomie, dass heute „eine Revolution
sowohl unmöglich als auch unabdingbar ist". Es ist dieses Paradoxon, das
Paolis ebenso scharfsinnige wie flanierende Geistesgegenwart antreibt.
Der Apokalypse-Blindheit einer Zivilisation am Abgrund hält Paoli im
Geiste von Günther Anders ein Denken von schonungsloser Widerständigkeit
und bestechender Klarheit entgegen, ohne dabei auf Eleganz zu
verzichten.
Herzliche Grüße,
Sara Walker
Sekretariat
Internationale Günther Anders-Gesellschaft
https://www.guenther-anders-gesellschaft.org/