Am 19.07.2025 um 13:42 schrieb ingo_mack über PhilWeb
<philweb(a)lists.philo.at>at>:
auf ganz genau 2,2 Sekunden freier Fall (9,82ms2) und das ist nicht vage sondern bis
heute nicht erklärt, auch nicht im NIST Report, wie dies ohne Sprengung zustande kommen
konnte.
Hi IM,
der NIST Report ist doch vielfach für seine Unvollständigkeit kritisiert worden, bspw. in
den Arbeiten
"A theory for the collapse of the World Trade Center":
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630713002604?via…
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630713002604?via=ihub>
Und "What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York:“
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Coll…
<http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf>
Auch einen Film kannst Du Dir dazu anschauen:
https://nrodlzdf-a.akamaihd.net/de/zdf/22/03/220310_11_september_inf/1/2203…
<https://nrodlzdf-a.akamaihd.net/de/zdf/22/03/220310_11_september_inf/1/220310_11_september_inf_3360k_p36v15.mp4>
"in seiner Vagheit verbreiteten
Verschwörungsmythen"
an meinem Geschreibsel, rspkt seiner "Vagheit" ist lediglich zu erkennen, dass
ich sehr genau weiß
welcher Art die "erlaubten" Antworten maximalst sein dürfen.
und bitte: kein hinweis auf "Meinungsfreiheit" Freiheit der Forschung"
oder ähnliches.
ein Kollaps der mit freiem Fall beginnt lässt keine Zweifel daran, dass darunter KEIN
Widerstand zum Zeitpunkt des Kollapses wahr.
oder?
Es geht nicht um die Erlaubnis von Antworten, sondern darum, wie sie begründet werden.
Warum müssen Explosionen denn durch Sprengungen bewirkt worden sein? Schwingt da
vielleicht ein Vorurteil mit?
Bei Frank Greening u.a. heißt es im Abstract: "Previous analysis of progressive
collapse showed that gravity alone suffices to explain the overall collapse of the World
Trade Center (WTC) towers. However, it remains to be checked whether the recent
allegations of controlled demolition have any scientific merit. The present analysis
proves that they do not. The video record available for the first few seconds of collapse
is shown to agree with the motion history calculated from the differential equation of
progressive collapse but, despite uncertain values of some parameters, it is totally out
of range of the free fall hypothesis, on which these allegations rest. It is shown that
the observed size range (0.01 mm—0.1 mm) of the dust particles of pulverized concrete is
consistent with the theory of comminution caused by impact, and that less than 10% of the
total gravitational energy, converted to kinetic energy, sufficed to produce this dust
(whereas more than 150 tons of TNT per tower would have to be installed, into many small
holes drilled into concrete, to produce the same pulverization). The air ejected from the
building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the ground, the speed of
almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the average, and fluctuations must have
reached the speed of sound. This explains the loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized
concrete and other fragments, and shows that the lower margin of the dust cloud could not
have coincided with the crushing front. The esisting upward forces due to pulverization
and to ejection of air, dust and solid fragments, neglected in previous studies, are found
to be indeed negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not insignificant
near the end of crush-down. The calculated crush-down duration is found to match a logical
interpretation of seismic record, while the free fall duration grossly disagrees with this
record.“
Und Christian J. Simensen fasst zusammen: "Two airplanes of type Boeing 767 flew into
the Twin Towers in the morning of September 11th 2001. The crashes caused fuel to ignite,
and the airplanes to be cut to pieces and be buried under building fragments. They were
subsequently heated to a high temperature. 30 tonnes of aluminium alloys in the airplanes
were melted at 660 °C while the surrounding building was only heated to a much lower
temperature due to insulation effects. When the temperature reached 750–800 °C, the huge
amount of aluminium melt managed to stream down to the lower floors. There it came in
contact with water from the automatic sprinkler devices and possibly other sources. This
encounter resulted in a series of fierce explosions due to the generation of hydrogen gas
and local heating to high temperatures well above 1200 °C. A complete floor of the
buildings was blown apart, and the upper part fell onto the bottom part leading to a
complete collapse.“
IT