[PhilWeb] Re: Götterdämmerung in der Philweb-Lounge

hallo Waldemar, werte Anwesende ooops..: In light of recent conversations, this abstract outlines the direction of a tentative project that seeks to engage with complex public narratives such as WTC7. It's less about conclusions than about how we might talk again—across divides. Abstract (Working Draft) This paper approaches the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on September 11, 2001 not primarily as a technical or forensic question, but as a powerful example of how public narratives shape collective perception, trust, and geopolitical consensus. WTC7 is treated as a symbolic entry point into the broader problem of societal fragmentation, contested truth claims, and the erosion of common ground in democratic discourse. The central aim is not to replace one narrative with another, but to develop a communicative methodology that allows for open, structured, and non-dogmatic conversations about controversial events. The collapse of WTC7 becomes a case study for exploring how truth is constructed, withheld, or defended within complex information environments. This draft outlines a model for facilitating such discourse without presuming shared conclusions or ideological alignment. It proposes a framework that prioritizes listening, narrative awareness, and discursive neutrality—seeking to build communicative resilience in disoriented societies. By anchoring this inquiry in a real and globally resonant event, the work aims to test whether respectful, open-ended dialogue can be restored—even between those who have fundamentally different worldviews. Am 03.08.25 um 17:28 schrieb waldemar hammel über PhilWeb: working in Progress gruss aus der Diaspora ingo mack